RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      다중지능 이론의 비판적 성찰 = A Critical Review of Multiple Intelligences Theory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104584936

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since Gardner’s criticisms of traditional intelligence tests and since the publication of his own multiple intelligences (MI) theory, its acceptance has been a subject of some contradiction. Whereas his theory is very popular (especially among developmental and educational psychologists) it has been somewhat harshly criticized by researchers from the perspective of psychological assessment. The main points of criticism are in regard to Gardner's assertion of MIs' independence from the general intelligence g factor , the domain specificity of MI, the assessment procedures of MI, and the inadequate empirical validation of attempts to implement MI theory into educational practice. This article reviews the statistical meaning of the g factor and data from biological psychology. Gardner's arguments about the purposes and methods of MI testing, his views about the application of MI theory in educational practice and the misapplication of MI theory are also discussed.
      번역하기

      Since Gardner’s criticisms of traditional intelligence tests and since the publication of his own multiple intelligences (MI) theory, its acceptance has been a subject of some contradiction. Whereas his theory is very popular (especially among devel...

      Since Gardner’s criticisms of traditional intelligence tests and since the publication of his own multiple intelligences (MI) theory, its acceptance has been a subject of some contradiction. Whereas his theory is very popular (especially among developmental and educational psychologists) it has been somewhat harshly criticized by researchers from the perspective of psychological assessment. The main points of criticism are in regard to Gardner's assertion of MIs' independence from the general intelligence g factor , the domain specificity of MI, the assessment procedures of MI, and the inadequate empirical validation of attempts to implement MI theory into educational practice. This article reviews the statistical meaning of the g factor and data from biological psychology. Gardner's arguments about the purposes and methods of MI testing, his views about the application of MI theory in educational practice and the misapplication of MI theory are also discussed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 하대현, "우리나라 지능 연구의 현황과 교육적 활용 과제" 한국교육심리학회 19 (19): 159-188, 2005

      2 차경희, "다중지능 이론에 근거한 지능 프로파일의 교육적 가능성 탐색" 한국교육과정학회 25 (25): 157-178, 2007

      3 문용린, "개인의 역량 측정을 위한 다중지능 하위요소의 재분석" 한국교육심리학회 21 (21): 283-309, 2007

      4 Blau, J., "Why test? Talent loss enrollment loss" 33 : 409-434, 2004

      5 Brand, C. R., "Why ignore the g factor? Historical considerarions. In The scientific study of general intelligence. Tribute to Arthur Jensen" Pergamon 503-529, 2003

      6 Brown, J. R, "Who rules science? An opinionated guide to the wars" Harvard University Press 2001

      7 Plucker, J. A., "Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students" 40 : 18-92, 1996

      8 Hülsheger, U. R., "Validity of general mental ability for the prediction of job performance and training success in Germany: A meta-analysis" 15 : 3-18, 2007

      9 Chen,J-Q, "Theory of multiple intelligences: Is it a scientific theory?" 106 : 17-23, 2004

      10 Cattell,R.B, "Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment" 54 : 1-22, 1963

      1 하대현, "우리나라 지능 연구의 현황과 교육적 활용 과제" 한국교육심리학회 19 (19): 159-188, 2005

      2 차경희, "다중지능 이론에 근거한 지능 프로파일의 교육적 가능성 탐색" 한국교육과정학회 25 (25): 157-178, 2007

      3 문용린, "개인의 역량 측정을 위한 다중지능 하위요소의 재분석" 한국교육심리학회 21 (21): 283-309, 2007

      4 Blau, J., "Why test? Talent loss enrollment loss" 33 : 409-434, 2004

      5 Brand, C. R., "Why ignore the g factor? Historical considerarions. In The scientific study of general intelligence. Tribute to Arthur Jensen" Pergamon 503-529, 2003

      6 Brown, J. R, "Who rules science? An opinionated guide to the wars" Harvard University Press 2001

      7 Plucker, J. A., "Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students" 40 : 18-92, 1996

      8 Hülsheger, U. R., "Validity of general mental ability for the prediction of job performance and training success in Germany: A meta-analysis" 15 : 3-18, 2007

      9 Chen,J-Q, "Theory of multiple intelligences: Is it a scientific theory?" 106 : 17-23, 2004

      10 Cattell,R.B, "Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment" 54 : 1-22, 1963

      11 Carroll, J. B, "The three-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and furure. In Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues" Guilford 69-76, 2005

      12 Allix,N, "The theory of multiple intelligences: A case of missing cognitive matter" 44 : 272-288, 2000

      13 Gardner, H, "The science of multiple intelligences theory: A response to Lynn Waterhouse" 41 : 227-232, 2006

      14 Neisser,U, "The rising curve"

      15 Landy, F. J, "The long, frustration, and fruitless search for social intelligence: A cautionary tale. In A critique of emotional intelligence: What are the problems and how can they be fixed?" Erlbaum 1-123, 2006

      16 Pinker,S, "The language instinct" Penguin Books 1994

      17 Nisbett,R.E, "The geography of thought. How Asians and Westerners think differently and why" Free Press 2003

      18 Shearer,C.M, "The MIDAS: Professional manual"

      19 Sternberg, R, "Successful intelligence in the classroom" 43 (43): 274-280, 2004

      20 Cattrall,K, "Sexual intelligence" Little, Brown & Company 2008

      21 Woodfolk, A, "Pädagogische Psychologie" Pearson Studium 2008

      22 Hasselhorn, M, "Pädagogische Psycholgie" Kohlhammer 2008

      23 Gardenr, H., "Project zero frameworks for early childhood education: Volume 1, building on children's strengths: The experience of project spectrum" Teacher's College Press 1998

      24 Williams, W., "Practical intelligence for school: Development metacognitive sources of achievement in adolescence" 22 (22): 162-210, 2002

      25 Gardner, H, "On failing to grasp the core MI theory: A response to Visser et al" 34 : 503-505, 2006

      26 Houdé, O, "Neural foundations of logical and mathematical cognition" 4 (4): 507-515, 2003

      27 Gordon, E. E, "Musical aptitude profile" GIA 1995

      28 Chan,D.W, "Musical aptitude and multiple intelligences among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: Do self-perceptions predict abilities?" 43 : 1604-1615, 2007

      29 Gardner,H, "Multiple intelligences: New horizons" Basic Books 2006

      30 Kornhaber, M., "Multiple intelligences: Best ideas from research and practice" Pearson/Allyn and Bacon 2004

      31 Waterhouse,L, "Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review" 41 : 207-225, 2006

      32 Rost,D.H, "Multiple Intelligenzen, multiple Irritationen" 22 (22): 97-112, 2008

      33 Kim, H. O, "Multiple Intelligenzen, Multiple Perspektiven" 23 (23): 65-74, 2009

      34 하대현, "MI 이론의 경험적 타당화 연구: 지능의 복수성의 교육적 활용효과" 1 (1): 55-65, 2009

      35 Chomsky,N, "Language and problems of knowledge" MIT Press 1988

      36 Gardner,H, "Intelligenzen. Die Vielfalt des menschlichen Geistes" Klett-Cotta 2002

      37 Gardner,H, "Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century" Basic Books 1999

      38 Strenze, T, "Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research" 35 : 401-426, 2007

      39 Busse, S, "Integration von hochbegabten Schülerinnen und Schüler in Unterricht und Schulleben der Grundschule" LIT 2008

      40 Ackerman, P. L, "Individual differnces in cognitive functions. In Handbook of educational Psychology" Erlbaum 139-161, 2006

      41 Waterhouse,L, "Inadequate evidence for multiple intelligences, Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence theories" 41 : 247-255, 2006

      42 Wild, K. P, "Identifikation hochbegabter Schüler. Lehrer und Schüler als Datenquellen" Asanger 1991

      43 하대현, "H. Garnder의 다지능 이론의 교육적 적용: 그 가능성과 한계" 12 (12): 73-100, 1998

      44 Gardner, H, "Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences" Basic Books 1983

      45 Horn, J. L, "Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues" Guilford 41-76, 2005

      46 Sodian,B, "Entwicklung des Denkens. In Entwicklungspsychologie" Beltz- Psychologie Verlags Union 2008

      47 Kincheloe, J. L, "Critical democracy and education. In Understanding democratic curriculum leadership" Teacher's College Press 1999

      48 Gardner,H, "Creating minds" Basic Books 1993

      49 Chopra,D, "Creating health: How to wake up the body's intelligence" Houghton Mifflin 1995

      50 Astuti, R, "Constraints on conceptual development: A case study of the acquisition of folkbiological and folksociological knowledge in Madagascar" 69 (69): 1-135, 2004

      51 Ziegler, A, "Conception of giftedness from a meta-tehoretical perspective. In International handbook of giftedness and talent" Elsevier 2000

      52 Kahaner, L. C, "Competetive intelligence. How to gather, analyze, and use information to move your business to the top" Touchstone Press 1998

      53 Gardner,H, "Audience for the theory of multiple intelligences" 106 : 212-220, 2004

      54 Deco, G, "Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: A unifying theory" 76 : 236-256, 2005

      55 Chen, J-Q, "Assessment based on multiple intelligences theory. In Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues" Guilford 77-102, 2005

      56 Sternberg,R, "Applying psychological theories to educational practice" 45 (45): 150-165, 2008

      57 Kahneman,D, "A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality" 58 : 697-720, 2003

      58 Duncan, J., "A neural basis for general intelligence" 289 : 457-460, 2000

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.88 1.88 1.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.85 2.02 2.36 0.43
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼