RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Performance and Clinical Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Intramural Lesions

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101605244

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: We evaluated the performance, clinical role, and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in gastrointestinal intramural lesions. Methods: Procedural and pathologic data were reviewed from c...

      Background/Aims: We evaluated the performance, clinical role, and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in gastrointestinal intramural lesions.
      Methods: Procedural and pathologic data were reviewed from consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for intramural lesions. Final diagnoses were determined by surgical histopathologic conformation and the diagnosis of malignancy, including clinical follow-up with repeat imaging.
      Results: Forty-six patients (mean age, 47 years; 24 male) underwent EUS-FNA. Lesions were located in the stomach (n=31), esophagus (n=5), and duodenum (n=10). The median lesion size was 2 cm (range, 1 to 20.6). Final diagnoses were obtained in 22 patients (48%). EUS-FNA was diagnostic in 40 patients (87%). The diagnostic accuracy of cytology for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions was 82%; diagnostic error occurred in three patients (6%). The cytologic results influenced clinical judgment in 78% cases. The primary reasons for negative or no clinical impact were false-negative results, misdirected patient management, and inconclusive cytology.
      Conclusions: EUS-FNA exhibited an 87% diagnostic yield for gastrointestinal intramural lesions; the accuracy of cytology for differentiating malignancy was 82%. The limitations of EUS-FNA were primarily because of nondiagnostic sampling (9%) and probable diagnostic error (6%); these factors may influence the clinical role of EUS-FNA.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Watson RR, "Yield and performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosing upper GI tract stromal tumors" 56 : 1757-1762, 2011

      2 Ando N, "The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis" 55 : 37-43, 2002

      3 Philipper M, "Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors" 42 : 300-305, 2010

      4 Matsui M, "Preliminary results of fine needle aspiration biopsy histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors" 30 : 750-755, 1998

      5 Demetri GD, "NCCN Task Force report: management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): update of the NCCN clinical practice guidelines" 5 (5): S1-S29, 2007

      6 Chen VK, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of intramural and extraintestinal mass lesions: diagnostic accuracy, complication assessment, and impact on management" 37 : 984-989, 2005

      7 Wiersema MJ, "Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract" 38 : 35-39, 1992

      8 Hoda KM, "EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors" 69 : 1218-1223, 2009

      9 Mekky MA, "Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors" 71 : 913-919, 2010

      10 Fletcher CD, "Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach" 33 : 459-465, 2002

      1 Watson RR, "Yield and performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosing upper GI tract stromal tumors" 56 : 1757-1762, 2011

      2 Ando N, "The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis" 55 : 37-43, 2002

      3 Philipper M, "Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors" 42 : 300-305, 2010

      4 Matsui M, "Preliminary results of fine needle aspiration biopsy histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors" 30 : 750-755, 1998

      5 Demetri GD, "NCCN Task Force report: management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): update of the NCCN clinical practice guidelines" 5 (5): S1-S29, 2007

      6 Chen VK, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of intramural and extraintestinal mass lesions: diagnostic accuracy, complication assessment, and impact on management" 37 : 984-989, 2005

      7 Wiersema MJ, "Endoscopic ultrasonography as an adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract" 38 : 35-39, 1992

      8 Hoda KM, "EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors" 69 : 1218-1223, 2009

      9 Mekky MA, "Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors" 71 : 913-919, 2010

      10 Fletcher CD, "Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach" 33 : 459-465, 2002

      11 Ha CY, "Diagnosis and management of GI stromal tumors by EUS-FNA: a survey of opinions and practices of endosonographers" 69 : 1039-1044, 2009

      12 Eltoum IA, "Cumulative sum procedure in evaluation of EUS-guided FNA cytology: the learning curve and diagnostic performance beyond sensitivity and specificity" 18 : 143-150, 2007

      13 Karaca C, "Accuracy of EUS in the evaluation of small gastric subepithelial lesions" 71 : 722-727, 2010

      14 Hwang JH, "A prospective study comparing endoscopy and EUS in the evaluation of GI subepithelial masses" 62 : 202-208, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-12-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회지 -> Clinical Endoscopy
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy -> Clinical Endoscopy
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회 -> 대한소화기내시경학회지 KCI등재후보
      2006-06-21 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.23 0.22 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.18 0.38 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼