방산업체 연구개발 효율성 평가에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Nowadays, the performance evaluation of R&D activities to yield fundamental information for the effectiveness of decision-making on R&D investment has become important since the government budget is limited.
This article suggests a hybrid type of evaluation model (i.e. qualitatively weighted quantified model) that makes up assessment of both quantitative and qualitative R&D performances in the Korean defense industry. The model tries to combine a DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) methodology that uses a well-known quantitative measure for technical and cost efficiency of a number of DMUs (Decision Making Units) and an AHP (Analysis Hierarchical Process) method that helps discopose the qualitative evaluation problem into a hierarchical or more easily comprehensible sub-problems.
Weight is measured for each qualitatively evaluating hierarchy by a survey targeting defense industry experts, researchers, military specialists, and planners. Technical and cost efficiency of a DMU are relatively calculated by comparing differences in efficiency across all DMUs while the importance of each quantitative measure is weighted. We verified the suggested model by practically evaluating 7 major companies in the Korean defense industry.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 선행연구 조사
• 2.1 국방 연구개발의 특징
• 2.2 선행연구 분석
• 3. 기존 평가방법 분석
• 3.1 기존 국방 연구개발 평가방법
• 3.2 기존 국방 연구개발 평가방법의 문제점
• 3.3 방산업체 효율성 평가모형 도출
• 4. 방산업체 평가의 복합지표 선정
• 4.1 복합지표 형식
• 4.2 정성적/정량적 지표 매핑
• 5. 복합평가 모델
• 5.1 정성/정량적 지표의 AHP-DEA 분석
• 5.2 AHP를 이용한 정성적 지표 분석
• 5.3 DEA를 이용한 정량적 지표 분석
• 6. 복합평가 모델의 적용
• 6.1 평가대상 선정
• 6.2 정성적 지표 분석
• 6.3 정량적 지표 분석
• 7. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 임호순, "연구개발사업의 평가 및 선정을 위한 DEA/AHP통합모형에 관한 연구" 24 (24): 1-12, 1999

2 임호순, "연구개발사업의 선정을 위한 DEA/AHP 통합모형의 실용화에 대한 연구" 2000

3 박수동, "비모수적 방법을 이용한 OECD 국가별 R&D 효율성과 생산성 분석" 기술경영경제학회 11 (11): 151-174, 2003

4 "방위사업청 통계연보" 방위사업청 2010

5 "방위사업관리규정 (개정 2011.8.9. 방위사업청훈령 제158호)"

6 "방산업체경영분석" 방위산업진흥회 2009

7 권철신, "기술특성을 고려한 연구 생산성 측정모형" 한국경영과학회 2001

8 김정호, "국가지정연구실의 기술분야별 연구주체별 R&D효율성 비교분석" 14 (14): 21-36, 2004

9 "국가를당사자로하는계약에관한법률시행령, (개정2004.12.31 대통령령제18666호)"

10 "국가를당사자로하는계약에관한법률시행규칙(개정2003.12.12 재정경제부령제335호)"

11 Hummel, J. M., "The analytic hierarchy process : an effective tool for a strategic decision of a multidisciplinary research center" 1 (1): 42-63, 1998

12 Greene, J. C., "The Merit of Mixing Methods in Evaluation" 7 (7): 25-44, 2001

13 Farrell, M., "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency" 120A : 1957

14 Satty,T.L, "The Analytic Hierachy Process" McGraw-Hill 1980

15 Brown, M.G., "Svenson Raynold A., Measuring R&D Productivity" 11-15, 1988

16 Banker, R. D., "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis" 30 (30): 1078-1092, 1984

17 Garrett-Jones, S., "Some International Benchmarks for Evaluating Australian Health and Medical Research" 13 (13): 155-166, 2004

18 Wang, Eric C., "Relative efficiency of R&D activities" 36 : 260-273, 2006

19 Fahrenkreg, G., "RTD Evaluation Toolbox : Assessing the Socio-economic Impacts of RTD-Policies, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies" European Commission 2002

20 Werner, Bjorn M., "Measuring R&D performance - state of the art" 40 (40): 34-42, 1997

21 Charnes, A., "Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency - an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Fellow Through" 27 (27): 668-697, 1981

22 Chiesa, V., "Development of a technical innovation audit" 13 : 105-136, 1996

23 Cook, W. D, "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on" 192 : 1-17, 2009

24 정구호, "DEA모형을이용한유럽방산업체효율석분석" 국방대학교 2005

25 양의준, "DEA를이용한미국방산업체의효율성분석" 국방대학교 2005

26 이대순, "DEA 모델을이용한방산업체의효율성평가" 국방대학교 2006

27 Satty, T. L., "An Exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper remark on the analytic hierarchy process" 36 (36): 259-268, 1990

28 Feng, Y. J., "An AHP/DEA Method for Measurement of the Efficiency of R&D Management Activities in Universities" 11 (11): 181-191, 2004

29 "2010국방과학기술조사서" 국방기술품질원 2010