RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유라시아경제연합과 중앙아시아 = 경제통합 실현을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100431054

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The world has a new Eurasian Economic Commission in Central Asia consisting of Kazakhstan, Russia and Belarus. These three Central Asian countries have formed a Single Economic Space and a Customs Union. They are aiming towards an Eurasian Economic Un...

      The world has a new Eurasian Economic Commission in Central Asia consisting of Kazakhstan, Russia and Belarus. These three Central Asian countries have formed a Single Economic Space and a Customs Union. They are aiming towards an Eurasian Economic Union in 2015 with an overall free trade area between them.
      The Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC) originated from the Commonwealth of Independent States. The treaty on the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Community was on agreed on October 10, 2000. A Common Economic Space for the community was launched on January 1, 2010. The Eurasian Economic Commission is the regulatory agency for the Eurasian Economic Community Common Economic Space and the Customs Union.
      Other Central Asian nations have voiced their view that they would like to join the Customs Union. There is a rigorous process of accession to join. Theoretically, membership of the EEU is in Central Asia’s interest. It satisfies the former-Soviet section of Central Asia’s “multi-vector” foreign policy and acts as a counter-balance to Chinese influence in the region. However, the envisaged economic benefits have fallen short. The Customs Union was supposed to open up Central Asia manufacturing to Russian markets, but in technical regulations between Russia and Central Asia have increased costs on Central Asia’s exports to Russia. In the long-term, Central Asia is unwilling to support unfavourable economic conditions for the sake of maintaining good relations with Russia; particularly if China offers a less complicated alternative.
      As China strengthens its bi-lateral relations with the five Central Asian states, and reinforces relations with Russia, third-party economic relations that could counteract Chinese investments in the region become more likely. China has been relatively quiet on its view of the EEU. Previously China was generally dismissive of negative effects of the Customs Union, but the timing of the EEU’s creation may cause quiet concern within the Chinese government. China can draw some comfort from the obvious weaknesses of the agreement.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • II. 경제통합의 이론적 고찰
      • III. 유라시아경제연합의 진행과 발전
      • IV. 유라시아연합유라시아연합 (Евразий ский Союз)으로의 전환
      • V. 결론
      • I. 서론
      • II. 경제통합의 이론적 고찰
      • III. 유라시아경제연합의 진행과 발전
      • IV. 유라시아연합유라시아연합 (Евразий ский Союз)으로의 전환
      • V. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼