해방 전후 국사교과서에 나타난 역사교육 인식 -『中等朝鮮歷史』, 『增訂 中等朝鮮歷史』, 『中等國史』의 비교- = Perspective of History Education in late Japanese Colonial Period and 8․15 Korea’s Liberation Times. -Comparison of Secondary School Korean History, Additional and Revised Middle School Korean History, Secondary School National History-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study compared the contents of Hwang, Ui Don(黃義敦)’s Secondary School Korean History(『中等朝鮮歷史』) published in 1926, Additional and Revised Secondary School Korean History(『增訂 中等朝鮮歷史』) published in 1928 and Secondary School National History(『中等國史』) compiled in September 1945, right after Korea’s liberation from Japanese colony, analyzing the view of the nature of history textbook for pupils’ history learning. The results this study are as follows.
First, history textbook authors was interested in making students understand history easier. Thus, they changed the Chinese letter style or old-fashioned sentences into Korean modern letters, and deleted some detailed historical facts for understanding of the outline and trends of history. Such revision of contents depended on history textbooks author’s perspective of history education and educational judgment.
Second, the revised contents of history textbook were based on historians’ researching results and common arguments. Accordingly, some descriptions of historical facts were modified and excessive expressions of national sentiment were reduced. However, some contents have been revised to strengthen national consciousness, depending on the research results. These revisions basically reflected the of history education for teaching students.
Korean history textbooks in 8․15 Liberation Times, for example Secondary School National History, which hurriedly reprinted Korean history books published under Japanese colonial rule, could not escape the historical interpretation of Japanese colonial historiography. It could not contain any areas other than political history and cultural history. However, the revision helped students understand the history and properly adjusted the width and depth of historical facts that they needed to know.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 민성희, "해방 직후(1945~1948) 황의돈의 국사교육 재건 활동" 한국역사교육학회 (21) : 89-140, 2015

2 박종린, "해방 직후 한국통사서와 『增訂 中等朝鮮歷史』" 민족문화연구원 (64) : 215-246, 2014

3 심승구, "한국의 역사가와 역사학(하)" 창작과 비평사 1994

4 이종국, "한국의 교과서 출판 변천 연구" 일진사 2001

5 이병도, "한국사(고대편)" 을유문화사 1959

6 방기중, "한국사 인식과 역사이론" 지식산업사 1997

7 이호영, "한국사 9(통일신라)" 국사편찬위원회 1998

8 "중등국사(등사본)"

9 문일평, "조선사의 교과서에 대하여" 10 : 1927

10 사마광, "자치통감9(晉시대)" 삼화 2007

11 김한종, "일제하 신문·잡지에 나타난 역사교육론" 한국교원대학교 사회과학교육연구소 13 : 2011

12 김한종, "역사교육으로 읽는 한국현대사" 책과함께 2013

13 "식민지조선교육정책사료집성19(하)" 대학서원 1990

14 이대의, "나와 검인정 교과서" 중앙출판공사 2002

15 이승곤, "근현대 국사 교과서의 비교 -『중등교과 동국사략』, 『中等朝鮮歷史』, 중등학교 사회생활과 『우리나라의 생활(국사 부분)』을 중심으로-" 7 : 2000

16 "고 해원 황의돈 박사 저작목록" 8 : 1965

17 황의돈, "新編朝鮮歷史" 이문당 1923

18 황의돈, "中等朝鮮歷史" 홍문각 1926

19 황의돈, "中等朝鮮歷史" 鴻文園 1929

20 황의돈, "中等朝鮮歷史" 문예사출판부 1945

21 황의돈, "中等國史" 계몽사 1945

22 박종린, "‘朝鮮史’의 서술과 역사지식 대중화 - 黃義敦의 『中等朝鮮歷史』를 중심으로" 역사문제연구소 18 (18): 212-238, 2014

23 허미애, "1930년대 전반기 일제의 고등보통학교 역사교과서 검인정제도와 조선사 교육의 특성" 한국사연구회 (186) : 423-459, 2019