RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      제휴 시 양 기업의 산업 및 지리적 유사성에 따른 협력 프레임: 지분 기반 합작투자와 반복제휴형성의 조절효과를 중심으로 = Adequate Cooperation Frame of Alliance for Firm Similarity: Moderation Effect of Joint Venture and Repeated Partnership

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105940195

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      International alliances and inter-industry alliances are forming actively in order to acquire diverse knowledge and resource in the competitive market. Nonetheless more than half of the cases fail to meet their goal of partnership. To avoid failure and attain successful result, adopting appropriate cooperation frame is important which takes product market and geographical similarity into account. Despite such importance, the study on proper cooperation frame for alliance partners depending on industrial and national similarity is insufficient, and further, studies concerning similarity and partnership show varying results. These incoherent results are caused by failure to recognize that alliance performance is decided by the fit of similarity between partners and cooperation frame. Therefore, this study focuses on two methods of cooperation frame namely equity joint venture and repeated partnership which will restrict opportunism and promote sharing of resource. This study conducted empirical analysis on alliance cases in high-tech industry from 2000 to 2009 and measured firm performance with the abnormal stock return of the focal firm. As a result, when national similarity was low, in other words, when both firms were geographically distant from each other, establishing equity joint venture to restrict partner’s opportunism increased the firm performance, while it did not affect the performance when product market similarity was high. On the other hand, when product market similarity was high, repeated partnership rather decreased the firm performance. This study provides an in-depth implication to effectively control the transaction cost which accrues during alliance by suggesting appropriate cooperation frame depending on the similarity of both alliance partners. Furthermore, it offers guidelines for selecting cooperation frame which can reduce the risk of failure of an alliance for managers as well.
      번역하기

      International alliances and inter-industry alliances are forming actively in order to acquire diverse knowledge and resource in the competitive market. Nonetheless more than half of the cases fail to meet their goal of partnership. To avoid failure an...

      International alliances and inter-industry alliances are forming actively in order to acquire diverse knowledge and resource in the competitive market. Nonetheless more than half of the cases fail to meet their goal of partnership. To avoid failure and attain successful result, adopting appropriate cooperation frame is important which takes product market and geographical similarity into account. Despite such importance, the study on proper cooperation frame for alliance partners depending on industrial and national similarity is insufficient, and further, studies concerning similarity and partnership show varying results. These incoherent results are caused by failure to recognize that alliance performance is decided by the fit of similarity between partners and cooperation frame. Therefore, this study focuses on two methods of cooperation frame namely equity joint venture and repeated partnership which will restrict opportunism and promote sharing of resource. This study conducted empirical analysis on alliance cases in high-tech industry from 2000 to 2009 and measured firm performance with the abnormal stock return of the focal firm. As a result, when national similarity was low, in other words, when both firms were geographically distant from each other, establishing equity joint venture to restrict partner’s opportunism increased the firm performance, while it did not affect the performance when product market similarity was high. On the other hand, when product market similarity was high, repeated partnership rather decreased the firm performance. This study provides an in-depth implication to effectively control the transaction cost which accrues during alliance by suggesting appropriate cooperation frame depending on the similarity of both alliance partners. Furthermore, it offers guidelines for selecting cooperation frame which can reduce the risk of failure of an alliance for managers as well.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      경쟁적인 시장에서 다양한 지식 및 자원을 획득하기 위하여 국제적 제휴와 다른 산업간의 제휴가 활발하게 나타나고 있다. 그러나 협력활동의 목적을 달성하지 못하며 실패를 하는 경우가 과반수 이상으로 나타나고 있는 실정이다. 제휴가 성공적인 결과를 얻기 위해서는 제휴의 목적을 달성하도록 제품시장 및 국가지리적 유사성을 고려한 적합한 협력 프레임을 갖추는 것이 무엇보다 중요하다. 그러나 이러한 중요성에도 불구하고 유사성에 따른 제휴 파트너 사이의 적절한 협력관계의 프레임에 관한 연구는 국내외적으로 많지 않으며 심지어 유사성 및 협력관계에 관한 연구들은 혼재된 결과들을 보이고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 제휴에서 파트너의 기회주의를 통제하고 자원의 공유를 촉진시킬 협업 프레임으로 지분기반 합작투자와 반복된 파트너십을 두 기준으로 삼아 연구를 진행하였다.
      본 연구는 제품시장 및 지리적 유사성에 따른 제휴형태의 선택이 기업 성과에 미치는 영향력에 대한 가설들을 검증하기 위하여 하이테크 산업에서의 2000년부터 2009년도 사이 기업들의 제휴사례를 실증 분석하였으며 자사의 비정상주식수익률로 기업 성과를 측정하였다. 연구결과 국가적 유사성이 낮은 경우, 지분 기반 합작기업 만들어 상대의 기회주의적 행동을 통제하는 것이 기업 성과를 높였으나 제품 시장 유사성이 높은 경쟁환경에서는 지분기반 합작기업의 여부는 성과에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 반면 제품시장 유사성이 높을 때 반복된 제휴는 오히려 기업 성과를 더 낮추었다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해서 제휴 시 양 기업간 유사성에 따른 적절한 협업 프레임을 제시하여 제휴 시 발생하는 거래비용을 효과적으로 통제하는 역할에 대한 깊은 이해를 제공했다. 뿐만 아니라 실무자에게도 양 기업의 관계적 특성에 따라 제휴의 실패를 줄일 수 있는 협력 프레임을 설정하는 가이드라인을 제공하는데 도움이 되고자 한다.
      번역하기

      경쟁적인 시장에서 다양한 지식 및 자원을 획득하기 위하여 국제적 제휴와 다른 산업간의 제휴가 활발하게 나타나고 있다. 그러나 협력활동의 목적을 달성하지 못하며 실패를 하는 경우가 ...

      경쟁적인 시장에서 다양한 지식 및 자원을 획득하기 위하여 국제적 제휴와 다른 산업간의 제휴가 활발하게 나타나고 있다. 그러나 협력활동의 목적을 달성하지 못하며 실패를 하는 경우가 과반수 이상으로 나타나고 있는 실정이다. 제휴가 성공적인 결과를 얻기 위해서는 제휴의 목적을 달성하도록 제품시장 및 국가지리적 유사성을 고려한 적합한 협력 프레임을 갖추는 것이 무엇보다 중요하다. 그러나 이러한 중요성에도 불구하고 유사성에 따른 제휴 파트너 사이의 적절한 협력관계의 프레임에 관한 연구는 국내외적으로 많지 않으며 심지어 유사성 및 협력관계에 관한 연구들은 혼재된 결과들을 보이고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 제휴에서 파트너의 기회주의를 통제하고 자원의 공유를 촉진시킬 협업 프레임으로 지분기반 합작투자와 반복된 파트너십을 두 기준으로 삼아 연구를 진행하였다.
      본 연구는 제품시장 및 지리적 유사성에 따른 제휴형태의 선택이 기업 성과에 미치는 영향력에 대한 가설들을 검증하기 위하여 하이테크 산업에서의 2000년부터 2009년도 사이 기업들의 제휴사례를 실증 분석하였으며 자사의 비정상주식수익률로 기업 성과를 측정하였다. 연구결과 국가적 유사성이 낮은 경우, 지분 기반 합작기업 만들어 상대의 기회주의적 행동을 통제하는 것이 기업 성과를 높였으나 제품 시장 유사성이 높은 경쟁환경에서는 지분기반 합작기업의 여부는 성과에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 반면 제품시장 유사성이 높을 때 반복된 제휴는 오히려 기업 성과를 더 낮추었다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해서 제휴 시 양 기업간 유사성에 따른 적절한 협업 프레임을 제시하여 제휴 시 발생하는 거래비용을 효과적으로 통제하는 역할에 대한 깊은 이해를 제공했다. 뿐만 아니라 실무자에게도 양 기업의 관계적 특성에 따라 제휴의 실패를 줄일 수 있는 협력 프레임을 설정하는 가이드라인을 제공하는데 도움이 되고자 한다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이종국, "인수 기업의 제품 및 지리적 시장 다양성이 인수 후 기술혁신성과에 미치는 영향" 한국상품학회 32 (32): 77-90, 2014

      2 Ernst, D., "Your Alliances Are Too Stable" 83 (83): 133-141, 2005

      3 Luo, X., "Working with Rivals : The Impact of Competitor Alliances on Financial Performance" 44 (44): 73-83, 2007

      4 Park, S. H., "When Competition Eclipses Cooperation : An Event History Analysis of Joint Venture Failure" 42 (42): 875-890, 1996

      5 Kale, P., "Value Creation and Success in Strategic Alliances : Alliancing Skills and the Role of Alliance Structure and Systems" 19 (19): 463-471, 2001

      6 Pisano, G. P., "Using Equity Participation to Support Exchange: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry" 5 (5): 109-126, 1989

      7 Brown, S. J., "Using Daily Stock Returns" 14 (14): 3-31, 1985

      8 Hagedoorn, J., "Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering : Nterorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences" 14 (14): 371-385, 1993

      9 Fang, E., "Understanding the Effects of Plural Marketing Structures on Alliance Performance" 53 (53): 628-645, 2016

      10 Das, T. K., "Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances : An Integrated Framework" 22 (22): 251-283, 2001

      1 이종국, "인수 기업의 제품 및 지리적 시장 다양성이 인수 후 기술혁신성과에 미치는 영향" 한국상품학회 32 (32): 77-90, 2014

      2 Ernst, D., "Your Alliances Are Too Stable" 83 (83): 133-141, 2005

      3 Luo, X., "Working with Rivals : The Impact of Competitor Alliances on Financial Performance" 44 (44): 73-83, 2007

      4 Park, S. H., "When Competition Eclipses Cooperation : An Event History Analysis of Joint Venture Failure" 42 (42): 875-890, 1996

      5 Kale, P., "Value Creation and Success in Strategic Alliances : Alliancing Skills and the Role of Alliance Structure and Systems" 19 (19): 463-471, 2001

      6 Pisano, G. P., "Using Equity Participation to Support Exchange: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry" 5 (5): 109-126, 1989

      7 Brown, S. J., "Using Daily Stock Returns" 14 (14): 3-31, 1985

      8 Hagedoorn, J., "Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering : Nterorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences" 14 (14): 371-385, 1993

      9 Fang, E., "Understanding the Effects of Plural Marketing Structures on Alliance Performance" 53 (53): 628-645, 2016

      10 Das, T. K., "Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances : An Integrated Framework" 22 (22): 251-283, 2001

      11 Dirks, K. T., "Trust in Leadership : Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice" 87 (87): 611-, 2002

      12 Mizik, N., "Trading Off between Value Creation and Value Appropriation : The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis" 67 (67): 63-76, 2003

      13 Johanson, J., "The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited : From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership" 40 (40): 1411-1431, 2009

      14 Fang, E., "The Timing of Codevelopment Alliances in New Product Development Processes : Returns for Upstream and Downstream Partners" 79 (79): 64-82, 2015

      15 Oxley, J. E., "The Scope and Governance of International RandD Alliances" 25 (25): 723-749, 2004

      16 Dyer, J. H., "The Relational View : Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage" 23 (23): 660-679, 1998

      17 Lin, Z. J., "The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations : Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing" 53 (53): 1645-1658, 2007

      18 Pangarkar, N., "The Impacts of Alliance Purpose and Partner Similarity on Alliance Governance" 12 (12): 341-353, 2001

      19 Cassiman, B., "The Impact of Manda on the RandD Process : An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Technological-and Market-Relatedness" 34 (34): 195-220, 2005

      20 Ambos, T. C., "The Impact of Distance on Knowledge Transfer Effectiveness in Multinational Corporations" 15 (15): 1-14, 2009

      21 Wuyts, S., "The Formation of Buyer—Supplier Relationships : Detailed Contract Drafting and Close Partner Selection" 69 (69): 103-117, 2005

      22 Eng, T. -Y., "The Effects of Learning on Relationship Value in a Business Network Context" 12 (12): 67-101, 2005

      23 Khamseh, H. M., "The Effect of Learning Approaches on the Utilization of External Knowledge in Strategic Alliances" 63 : 92-104, 2017

      24 Khanna, T., "The Dynamics of Learning Alliances : Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope" 19 (19): 193-210, 1998

      25 Fama, E. F., "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns" 47 (47): 427-465, 1992

      26 Lerner, J., "The Control of Technology Alliances : An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry" 46 (46): 125-156, 1998

      27 Oh, Y., "The Contingency Value of the Partner Firm's Customer Assets in a Business-to-Business Relationship" 73 : 47-58, 2018

      28 Noordhoff, C. S., "The Bright Side and Dark Side of Embedded Ties in Business-to-Business Innovation" 75 (75): 34-52, 2011

      29 Gulati R., "The Architecture of Cooperation : Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances" 43 (43): 781-814, 1998

      30 Håkanson, L., "The Antecedents of Psychic Distance" 16 (16): 195-210, 2010

      31 Rindfleisch A., "The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances : A Strength-of-Ties Perspective" 65 (65): 1-18, 2001

      32 Reuer, J. J., "Termination Outcomes of Research Alliances" 34 (34): 101-115, 2005

      33 Wu, J., "Technological Collaboration in Product Innovation : The Role of Market Competition and Sectoral Technological Intensity" 41 (41): 489-496, 2012

      34 Ahuja, G., "Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms : A Longitudinal Study" 22 (22): 197-220, 2001

      35 De Meyer, A., "Tech Talk : How Managers Are Stimulating Global RandD Communication" 32 (32): 49-, 1991

      36 Ybarra, C. E., "Strategic Alliances with Competing Firms and Shareholder Value" 6 (6): 2011

      37 Gulati R., "Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns : A Longitudinal Analysis" 40 (40): 619-652, 1995

      38 DeSarbo, W. S., "Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework : Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance" 26 (26): 47-74, 2005

      39 Brouthers, K. D., "Resource-Based Advantages in an International Context†" 34 (34): 189-217, 2008

      40 Rogers, W., "Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples" 3 (3): 19-23, 1994

      41 Van Beers, C., "RandD Cooperation, Partner Diversity, and Innovation Performance : An Empirical Analysis" 31 (31): 292-312, 2014

      42 Reuer, J. J., "Post‐Formation Dynamics in Strategic Alliances" 23 (23): 135-151, 2002

      43 Delios, A., "Political Hazards, Experience, and Sequential Entry Strategies : The International Expansion of Japanese Firms 1980–1998" 24 (24): 1153-1164, 2003

      44 Hitt, M. A., "Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts : Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives" 43 (43): 449-467, 2000

      45 Thompson, J. D., "Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Vol. 1)" Transaction publishers 2011

      46 March, J. G., "Organizations"

      47 Daft, R. L., "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design" 32 (32): 554-571, 1986

      48 Carhart, M. M., "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance" 52 (52): 57-82, 1997

      49 Gulati R., "Network Location and Learning : The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation" 20 (20): 397-420, 1999

      50 Fama, E. F., "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies" 51 (51): 55-84, 1996

      51 Srinivasan, S., "Marketing and Firm Value : Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions" 46 (46): 293-312, 2009

      52 Swaminathan, V., "Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation" 73 (73): 52-69, 2009

      53 Lubatkin, M., "Managing Mergers across Borders : A Two-Nation Exploration of a Nationally Bound Administrative Heritage" 9 (9): 670-684, 1998

      54 Lin, X., "Local Partner Acquisition of Managerial Knowledge in International Joint Ventures : Focusing on Foreign Management Control" 45 (45): 219-237, 2005

      55 Dussauge, P., "Learning from Competing Partners : Outcomes and Durations of Scale and Link Alliances in Europe, North America and Asia" 21 (21): 99-126, 2000

      56 Kale, P., "Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances : Building Relational Capital" 21 (21): 217-237, 2000

      57 Kogut, B., "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology" 3 (3): 383-397, 1992

      58 Beamish, P. W., "Joint Ventures in Ldcs : Partner Selection and Performance" 27 (27): 23-37, 1987

      59 Kogut, B., "Joint Ventures and the Option to Expand and Acquire" 37 (37): 19-33, 1991

      60 Zollo, M., "Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances" 13 (13): 701-713, 2002

      61 Westney, D. E., "Internal and External Linkages in the Mnc: The Case of R and D Subsidiaries in Japan" Managing the Global Firm 279-300, 1990

      62 Park, S. H., "Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity : A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure" 12 (12): 37-53, 2001

      63 Parkhe, A., "Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity in Global Strategic Alliances" 22 (22): 579-601, 1991

      64 Brett, J., "Intercultural Challenges in Managing Workplace Conflict–a Call for Research" 25 (25): 32-52, 2018

      65 Hagedoorn, J., "Inter-Firm RandD Partnerships : An Overview of Major Trends and Patterns since 1960" 31 (31): 477-492, 2002

      66 Makino, S., "Intended and Unintended Termination of International Joint Ventures" 28 (28): 1113-1132, 2007

      67 Lee, R. P., "Implications of Service Processes Outsourcing on Firm Value" 39 (39): 853-861, 2010

      68 Finkelstein, S., "How Much Does the Ceo Matter? The Role of Managerial Discretion in the Setting of Ceo Compensation" 41 (41): 179-199, 1998

      69 Hansen, M. T., "How Do Multinational Companies Leverage Technological Competencies? Moving from Single to Interdependent Explanations" 25 (25): 801-822, 2004

      70 Kothari, S., "Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance" North-Holland 3-36, 2007

      71 Teng, B. -S., "Governance Structure Choice in Strategic Alliances : The Roles of Alliance Objectives, Alliance Management Experience, and International Partners" 46 (46): 725-742, 2008

      72 D'Angelo, A., "Geographical Pathways for Sme Internationalization : Insights from an Italian Sample" 30 (30): 80-105, 2013

      73 Barney, J., "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

      74 Brouthers, K. D., "Explaining the National Cultural Distance Paradox" 32 (32): 177-189, 2001

      75 Lu, J. W., "Equity Control and the Survival of International Joint Ventures : A Contingency Approach" 58 (58): 736-745, 2005

      76 O'Sullivan, D., "Empirical Evidence of the Stock Market's(Mis)Pricing of Customer Satisfaction" 26 (26): 154-161, 2009

      77 Fang, E., "Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value" 72 (72): 1-14, 2008

      78 Dhanaraj, C., "Effect of Equity Ownership on the Survival of International Joint Ventures" 25 (25): 295-305, 2004

      79 Ganesan, S., "Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development" 69 (69): 44-60, 2005

      80 Anand, B. N., "Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances" 21 (21): 295-315, 2000

      81 Singh J., "Distributed RandD, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output" 37 (37): 77-96, 2008

      82 Campello, M., "Debt Financing : Does It Boost or Hurt Firm Performance in Product Markets?" 82 (82): 135-172, 2006

      83 Hennart, J. -F., "Cross-Cultural Differences and Joint Venture Longevity" 33 (33): 699-716, 2002

      84 Lane, H. W., "Cross-Cultural Cooperative Behavior in Joint Ventures in Ldcs" 30 : 87-102, 1990

      85 Contractor, F. J., "Cooperative Strategies" International Business 1988

      86 Williamson, O. E., "Contested Exchange Versus the Governance of Contractual Relations" 7 (7): 103-108, 1993

      87 Chung, S., "Complementarity, Status Similarity and Social Capital as Drivers of Alliance Formation" 21 (21): 1-22, 2000

      88 Williamson, O. E., "Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives" Administrative science quarterly 269-296, 1991

      89 Brandenburger, A. M., "Co-Opetition" Crown Publishing Group 2011

      90 Choi, J., "Choosing an Appropriate Alliance Governance Mode : The Role of Institutional, Cultural and Geographical Distance in International Research and Development(RandD)Collaborations" 47 (47): 210-232, 2016

      91 Rothaermel, F. T., "Balancing Vertical Integration and Strategic Outsourcing : Effects on Product Portfolio, Product Success, and Firm Performance" 27 (27): 1033-1056, 2006

      92 Kalaignanam, K., "Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances : Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships?" 53 (53): 357-374, 2007

      93 Darr, E. D., "An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer" 82 (82): 28-44, 2000

      94 Berry, H., "An Institutional Approach to Cross-National Distance" 41 (41): 1460-1480, 2010

      95 Mitchell, W., "Alliances with Competitors : How to Combine and Protect Key Resources?" 11 (11): 203-223, 2002

      96 Oxley, J., "Alliance Structure and the Scope of Knowledge Transfer : Evidence from Us-Japan Agreements" 55 (55): 635-649, 2009

      97 Lavie, D., "Alliance Portfolio Internationalization and Firm Performance" 19 (19): 623-646, 2008

      98 Mamavi, O., "Alliance Management Capability : The Roles of Alliance Control and Strength of Ties" 53 (53): 2250-2267, 2015

      99 Das, T. K., "Alliance Constellations : A Social Exchange Perspective" 27 (27): 445-456, 2002

      100 Kale, P., "Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long‐Term Alliance Success : The Role of the Alliance Function" 23 (23): 747-767, 2002

      101 Doz, Y. L., "Alliance Advantage : The Art of Creating Value through" Harvard Business Press 1998

      102 Hennart, J. F., "A Transaction Costs Theory of Equity Joint Ventures" 9 (9): 361-374, 1988

      103 Ritter, J. R., "A Review of Ipo Activity, Pricing, and Allocations" 57 (57): 1795-1828, 2002

      104 Das, T. K., "A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances" 26 (26): 31-61, 2000

      105 Jones, C., "A General Theory of Network Governance : Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms" 22 (22): 911-945, 1997

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-02-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review -> Journal of Distribution and Management Research KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-03-16 학술지명변경 한글명 : 유통정보학회지 -> 유통경영학회지
      외국어명 : Korea Research Academy of Distribution Information Review -> Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review
      KCI등재
      2010-02-04 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국유통정보학회 -> 한국유통경영학회
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.79 0.79 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.93 0.92 1.252 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼