The WTO and its Four Organizational Challenges

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The WTO was established in 1995 to deepen freer trade among its members.
However since its formation, the WTO has been criticized for obsessively pursuing a free trade agenda at the expense of non economic values such as environmental conservation, sovereignty and the development in poor countries.
In this paper, I argue that the WTO faces four organizational challenges. First,because it is having a profound impact on many non State interest groups, it must be a forum where all interest groups that are affected by its policies can participate in the formulation of its policies. This is the democracy and participation challenge.
It can resolve this challenge by improving the participation of NGOs and Parliamentarians of member States in its affairs. For the WTO to succeed in meeting its objectives it also has to have an efficient and effective organizational structure.
This is the management challenge. A reformed WTO, with an executive board and a strong office of the Director‐General will meet the management challenge and help the WTO to achieve its objectives. Critics of the WTO claim that its rulemaking procedures which depend on consensus and super‐majorities are cumbersome. They argue that it does not allow the WTO to respond quickly to changes in the international trade environment. This is the rulemaking challenge. I argue that these “cumbersome” procedures are meant to protect sovereignty, which is a central concept in international relations. I argue that WTO rule‐making must continue to protect sovereignty. However, where a critical mass of countries wishes to introduce a new rule they should be able to do so. However, it should not bind countries who disagree with the introduction of the rule.
The WTO also faces a dispute settlement challenge. Not all the problems that come before the WTO DSB can be resolved by litigation. Also the remedies available under present WTO rules are inadequate and in certain situations they do not provide sufficient relief to countries whose rights have been breached. The WTO therefore has to develop other dispute settlement mechanisms like mediation to resolve disputes and they must provide other reliefs such as greater trade concessions or money payments to countries whose rights have been breach instead of the withdrawal of concessions which further damages the international trading system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Robert Hunter Wade, "What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’" 10 : 621-, 2003

2 Steve Charnovitz, "WTO Cosmopolitics" 34 : 299-, 2002

3 Daniel C. Esty, "The World Trade Organization’s legitimacy crisis" 1 : 7-, 2002

4 John McGinnis, "The World Trade Constitution" 114 : 511-, 2000

5 John H. Jackson, "The WTO “Constitution” and Proposed Reforms: Seven “Mantras” Revisited" 4 : 67-, 2001

6 Susan Esserman, "The WTO on Trial" 82 : 133-, 2003

7 John H. Jackson, "The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstanding of the Nature of Legal Obligation" 91 : 60-, 1997

8 Mitsuo Matsushita, "The Sutherland Report and its Discussion of Dispute Settlement Reforms" 8 : 623-, 2005

9 Robert Howse, "The Legitimacy of the World Trade Organization in THE LEGITIMACY OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS" 2001

10 Rodrik, D, "The Global Governance of Trade: As if Development Really Mattered"

11 Debra P. Steger, "The Future of the WTO: The Case for Institutional Reform" 12 : 803-, 2009

12 Larry A DiMatteo, "The Doha Declaration and Beyond: Giving a Voice to Non‐Trade Concerns Within the WTO Trade Regime" 36 : 95-, 2003

13 Robert O. Keohane, "The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and the Problems of Democratic Legitimacy’ in EFFICIENCY, EQUITY AND LEGITIMACY: THE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM AT THE MILLENNIUM" 2001

14 JOHN H. JACKSON, "THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION, CONSTITUTION AND JURISPRUDENCE"

15 BERNARD HOEKMAN, "THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM – THE WTO AND BEYOND, 3RD" 2009

16 Thomas J, "Schoenbaum International Trade and Protection of the Environment: The Continuing Search for Reconciliation" 91 : 268-, 1997

17 WTO, "REPORT OF THE CONSULTATIVE BOARD TO THE DIRECTOR‐GENERAL SUPACHAI PANITCHPAKDI ON THE FUTURE OF THE WTO: ADDRESSING INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM" 2004

18 Michael H Davis, "Legitimacy, Globally: The Incoherence of Free Trade Practice, Global Economics and their Governing Principles of Political Economy" 69 : 733-, 2001

19 Robert Howse, "Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing in the WTO is a Step Too Far in EFFICIENCY, EQUITY AND LEGITIMACY: THE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM AT THE MILLENNIUM" 2001

20 DANIEL ESTY, "GREENING THE GATT: TRADE, ENVIRONMENT AND THE FUTURE"

21 Robert Howse, "From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime" 96 : 94-, 2002

22 Daniel C. Esty, "Foreign Investment, Globalisation and Trade in GLOBALISATION AND ENVIRONMENT" 1997

23 BARFIELD CLAUDE E, "FREE TRADE, SOVEREIGNTY, DEMOCRACY: THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION"

24 DOUGLAS A. IRWIN, "FREE TRADE UNDER FIRE"

25 Daniel C. Esty, "Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness, A Conceptual Framework" 5 : 1998

26 John H. Jackson, "Editorial Comment: International Law Status of the WTO Dispute Settlement, Report: Obligations to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”?" 98 : 109-, 2004

27 Zampetti, Americo Beviglia, "Democratic Legitimacy in the World Trade Organization: The Justice Dimension" 37 : 105-, 2003

28 Daniel C. Esty, "Bridging the Trade‐Environment Divide" 15 : 113-, 2001

29 Robert Howse, "Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade, in THE EU, THE WTO AND THE NAFTA: TOWARDS A COMMON LAW OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE" 2000