RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      윤리학적 관점에서 <통합사회>의 인간 존엄성 개념 재고찰 - 칸트와 누스바움을 중심으로 - = Reconsidering Human Dignity in <Integrated Society> from the Ethical Perspective: Focusing on Kant and Nussbaum

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108279852

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper has two main purposes. One is to make it clear that the concept of human dignity is treated indirectly and ambiguously due to the absence of an ethical approach in the section ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and the Constitution’ unit of <Integrated Society>. The other is to propose content elements of the concept of human dignity by combining Kant and Nussbaum’s ethical thoughts that might be used in the developmental reconstruction of the ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and the Constitution’.
      Although the idea of human dignity itself has intrinsic uncertainty, more cohesive forms of explanation are available from the curriculum’s standpoint about human dignity. As a basic work for the developmental reconstruction of the ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and the Constitution’, this article extends the traditional paradigm of differentiating between the initial and the realized dignity through Kant’s ethical thoughts, which is the core justification base of the concept of human dignity. And this is further embodied through Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach, based on the vulnerability of the human body, which emphasizes the actualization of human dignity in daily life. In light of the foregoing, the last chapter suggests the content elements of the concept of human dignity and explores how to restructure the ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and Constitution’.
      번역하기

      This paper has two main purposes. One is to make it clear that the concept of human dignity is treated indirectly and ambiguously due to the absence of an ethical approach in the section ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and the Constitution’ unit of <...

      This paper has two main purposes. One is to make it clear that the concept of human dignity is treated indirectly and ambiguously due to the absence of an ethical approach in the section ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and the Constitution’ unit of <Integrated Society>. The other is to propose content elements of the concept of human dignity by combining Kant and Nussbaum’s ethical thoughts that might be used in the developmental reconstruction of the ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and the Constitution’.
      Although the idea of human dignity itself has intrinsic uncertainty, more cohesive forms of explanation are available from the curriculum’s standpoint about human dignity. As a basic work for the developmental reconstruction of the ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and the Constitution’, this article extends the traditional paradigm of differentiating between the initial and the realized dignity through Kant’s ethical thoughts, which is the core justification base of the concept of human dignity. And this is further embodied through Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach, based on the vulnerability of the human body, which emphasizes the actualization of human dignity in daily life. In light of the foregoing, the last chapter suggests the content elements of the concept of human dignity and explores how to restructure the ‘Guarantee of Human Rights and Constitution’.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼