RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Implementing Peer Assessment for Optimal Effects: Learners’ Voice

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107356052

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study attempted to figure out the optimal conditions for peer assessment to be successful from learners’ perspectives. Participants were twenty Korean college students majoring in TEFL, who practiced peer assessment in a content course, ...

      The present study attempted to figure out the optimal conditions for peer assessment to be successful from learners’ perspectives. Participants were twenty Korean college students majoring in TEFL, who practiced peer assessment in a content course, completed a pre-, and a post-survey about their perception of peer assessment, and responded to an interview after the semester. Several meaningful themes emerged from their voice in relation to the fundamental elements to be considered in designing and implementing peer assessment. First, working in group to perform the task to be peer-assessed proved to be highly effective in that it could offer much more opportunities to learn from each other first within the group members and then across different groups. Second, face-to-face peer assessment in class was generally preferred over on-line out-of-class, with the immediacy of feedback and other benefits interwoven with it. Third, the more experience of peer assessment in a curriculum and more frequent peer assessing activities in a course was often associated with the learners’ perceived learning achievement. Fourth, the teacher’s intervention could be a necessary condition to make the benefits of peer assessment greater. Implications for teachers and researchers are stated with limitations of the study.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Topping, K. J., "Using peer assessment to inspire reflection and learning" Routledge 2018

      2 Brown, G. T. L., "Use of interactive-informal assessment practices : New Zealand secondary students’ conceptions of assessment" 19 : 97-111, 2009

      3 Yu, S., "Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing : Insights from a case study" 33 : 25-35, 2017

      4 Roscoe, R. D., "Understanding tutor learning : Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions" 77 : 534-574, 2007

      5 Zheng, C., "Understanding the learning process of peer feedback activity : An ethnographic study of exploratory practice" 16 : 109-126, 2012

      6 Le Hebel, F., "Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy" Springer International Publishing 141-173, 2018

      7 Alfallay, I., "The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self-and peer-assessment" 32 : 407-425, 2004

      8 Birjandi, P., "The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance" 37 : 513-533, 2012

      9 Ruegg, R., "The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability" 29 : 73-82, 2015

      10 Pocock, T. M., "The impact of teamwork in peer assessment : a qualitative analysis of a group exercise at a UK medical school" 15 : 1-12, 2010

      1 Topping, K. J., "Using peer assessment to inspire reflection and learning" Routledge 2018

      2 Brown, G. T. L., "Use of interactive-informal assessment practices : New Zealand secondary students’ conceptions of assessment" 19 : 97-111, 2009

      3 Yu, S., "Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing : Insights from a case study" 33 : 25-35, 2017

      4 Roscoe, R. D., "Understanding tutor learning : Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions" 77 : 534-574, 2007

      5 Zheng, C., "Understanding the learning process of peer feedback activity : An ethnographic study of exploratory practice" 16 : 109-126, 2012

      6 Le Hebel, F., "Transforming assessment: Through an interplay between practice, research and policy" Springer International Publishing 141-173, 2018

      7 Alfallay, I., "The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self-and peer-assessment" 32 : 407-425, 2004

      8 Birjandi, P., "The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance" 37 : 513-533, 2012

      9 Ruegg, R., "The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability" 29 : 73-82, 2015

      10 Pocock, T. M., "The impact of teamwork in peer assessment : a qualitative analysis of a group exercise at a UK medical school" 15 : 1-12, 2010

      11 Paulus, T. M., "The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing" 8 : 265-289, 1999

      12 Reinholz, D., "The assessment cycle : A model for learning through peer assessment" 41 : 301-315, 2016

      13 Ganji, M., "Teacher-correction, peer-correction and self-correction : Their impacts on Iranian students’ IELTS essay writing performance" 6 : 117-139, 2009

      14 Sippel, L., "Teacher vs. peer oral corrective feedback in the German language classroom" 48 : 688-705, 2015

      15 Kaufman, J. H., "Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing : Their origin and impact on revision work" 39 : 387-406, 2011

      16 Falchikov, N., "Student peer assessment in higher education : A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks" 70 : 287-322, 2000

      17 Zou, Y., "Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment" 43 : 800-811, 2017

      18 Morahan-Martin, J., "Should peers’ evaluations be used in class projects? : Questions regarding reliability, leniency, and acceptance" 78 (78): 1243-1250, 1996

      19 Falchikov, N., "Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the long term" Routledge 128-143, 2007

      20 Chang, C. C., "Reliability and validity of web-based portfolio peer assessment : A case study for a senior high school’s students taking computer course" 57 : 1306-1316, 2011

      21 Allen, D., "Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback" 56 : 96-106, 2016

      22 Zhang. S., "Re-examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing class" 4 : 209-222, 1995

      23 Patton, B. J., "Practical applications for using peer assessment in physical education field experiences" 27 (27): 25-31, 2014

      24 Kissau, S. P., "Peer mentoring second language teachers: A mutually beneficial experience?" 48 : 143-160, 2015

      25 Lee, M-K., "Peer feedback in second language writing : Investigating junior secondary students’perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback" 55 : 1-10, 2015

      26 Strijbos, J-W., "Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?" 20 : 291-303, 2010

      27 Liu, N-F., "Peer feedback : The learning element of peer assessment" 11 : 279-290, 2006

      28 Cheng, W., "Peer assessment of language proficiency" 22 : 93-121, 2005

      29 Azarnoosh, M., "Peer assessment in an EFL context : Attitudes and friendship bias" 3 : 3-11, 2013

      30 Topping, K., "Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities" 68 (68): 249-276, 1998

      31 Zhu, W., "Participation in peer response as activity : An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective" 46 : 362-386, 2012

      32 Murillo-Zamorano, M., "Oral presentations in higher education : a comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback" 43 (43): 138-150, 2018

      33 Esmat Babaii, "One, Two, ... , Many: The Outcomes of Paired Peer Assessment, Group Peer Assessment, and Teacher Assessment in EFL Writing" 아시아테플 16 (16): 53-66, 2019

      34 Berggren, J., "Learning from giving feedback : A study of secondary-level students" 69 : 58-70, 2015

      35 Hu, G., "Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy : Exploring peer review in a second language writing class" 38 (38): 371-394, 2010

      36 Hu, G., "Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy : Exploring peer review in a second language writing class" 38 (38): 371-394, 2010

      37 Zhu, W., "Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups" 10 : 251-276, 2001

      38 조정순, "Impact of Peer Feedback on Learning: A Case of EFL Teacher Trainees" 아시아테플 16 (16): 1103-1118, 2019

      39 Chong, I., "How students’ ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers : A case study" 31 : 13-23, 2017

      40 Topping, K. J., "Handbook of research on classroom assessment" SAGE Publications, Inc 395-412, 2013

      41 Nawas, A., "Grading anxiety with self and peer-assessment : A mixed-method study in an Indonesian EFL context" 30 : 224-244, 2020

      42 Nelson, G., "Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues" Cambridge University Press 42-59, 2006

      43 Yu, S., "Exploring Chinese students’ strategy use in a cooperative peer feedback writing group" 58 : 1-11, 2016

      44 Sahin-Taskin, C., "Effects of active learning environments supported with self-and peer assessment on pre-service teachers’ pedagogical and self-efficacy beliefs" 46 (46): 421-440, 2018

      45 박정연, "Effectiveness of Teacher and Peer Feedback: Through the Lens of Korean Tertiary Writing Classroom" 아시아테플 15 (15): 429-444, 2018

      46 Saito, H., "EFL classroom peer assessment : Training effects on rating and commenting" 25 (25): 553-581, 2008

      47 Tsui, A. B. M., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?" 9 : 147-170, 2000

      48 Buchanan, E. A., "Distance learning and university effectiveness: Changing educational paradigms for online learning" Information Science Publishing 163-176, 2004

      49 Ballantyne, R., "Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process" 27 : 427-441, 2002

      50 Roskams, T., "Chinese EFL students’ attitudes to peer feedback and peer assessment in an extended pair work setting" 30 : 79-123, 1999

      51 Gielen, S., "An inventory of peer assessment diversity" 36 (36): 137-155, 2011

      52 Boud, D., "Aligning assessment with lone-term learning" 31 : 399-413, 2006

      53 Adachi, C., "Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education" 43 : 294-306, 2018

      54 Tahir, I. H., "A study on peer evaluation and its influence on college ESL students" 68 : 192-201, 2012

      55 Adachi, C., "A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment" 37 : 453-467, 2018

      56 Yang, M., "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class" 15 : 179-200, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-03-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 아시아영어교육학회 -> 아시아테플
      영문명 : The Asian Association Of Teachers Of English As A Foreign Language (Asia Tefl) -> AsiaTEFL (The Asian Association of Teachers of English As a Foreign Language)
      KCI등재
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼