한국판 인지실패 질문지의 타당화: 대학생을 대상으로 = A Study on the Validation of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire: Case of Korean College Students

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) was developed as a measure of everyday cognitive errors by Broadbent, Cooper, Fitzgerald, and Parkes (1982). Concerning the factor structure of this questionnaire, there have been various models suggested, including a 4-factor model which was suggested by Wallace, Kass, and Stanny (2002) and was validated by Wallace (2004). This study was performed to make Korean version of CFQ and to evaluate its factor structure and validity. With 293 college students, scores of cognitive failures, everyday attention, everyday memory, and five factor scales of personality, and their levels of academic achievement were surveyed. Factor analysis of CFQ suggested 5 factors, whose fit indices were assessed positively by confirmatory factor analysis. Correlation analysis showed that cognitive failures correlated highly with everyday attention and memory, but not with academic achievement level. As expected, cognitive failures had positive correlation with neuroticism and negative correlation with conscientiousness. In conclusion, Korean version of CFQ was judged to have a lot of validity, but it revealed somewhat different factor structure from the English one suggested by Wallace. Limitations of CFQ and directions of future studies were discussed.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

일상적으로 경험하는 인지 오류를 포괄적으로 측정하는 도구로서, Broadbent, Cooper, Fitzgerald와 Parkes(1982)는 인지실패 질문지를 개발하였다. 이 질문지의 요인구조들이 여러 가지로 제안되어 왔는데, Wallace(2004)는 자신과 동료들(Wallace, Kass, & Stanny, 2002)이 제안한 4 요인 모형의 타당성을 주장하였다. 본 연구는 번안된 인지실패질문지의 요인구조와 타당성을 검토하고자 수행되었다. 293 명의 대학생을 대상으로 인지실패, 일상주의, 일상기억, 성격의 5 요인 척도 및 학업성취 수준을 조사하였다. 인지실패 질문지를 요인분석하여 추출한 5개 요인으로 구성된 모형의 적합도를 확인적 요인분석으로 평가하였을 때, 이 모형이 수용할 만한 것으로 보였다. 척도들 간의 상관관계를 분석하였을 때, 인지실패는 주의 및 기억과 높은 상관을 보이나 학업성취 수준과는 상관을 보이지 않았다. 그리고 성격의 5 요인 중, 신경증과는 정적 상관을, 성실성과는 부적 상관을 보이는, 예상되는 결과가 얻어졌다. 번안한 인지실패 질문지는 타당한 것으로 보이지만, 그 요인구조는 Wallace(2004)의 제안과 차이가 있었다. 이는 인지실패 질문지에 대한 한국판의 고려가 필요함을 시사한다. 인지실패질문지의 한계점과 개선 방향에 대한 논의를 하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유태용, "한국판 HEXACO 성격검사의 구성타당화 연구" 한국사회및성격심리학회 18 (18): 61-75, 2004

2 윤선아, "주의력 조절 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당화 연구" 한국임상심리학회 26 (26): 185-199, 2007

3 이나경, "응용인지심리학" 시그마프레스 2008

4 이순묵, "요인분석 1" 학지사 1995

5 이 원 영, "안전행동 및 사고에 대한 성실성, 인지실패 및 직무스트레스의 상호작용" 한국산업및조직심리학회 19 (19): 475-497, 2006

6 Wickens, C. D, "공학심리학(3판)" 시그마프레스 2003

7 Wallace,J.C, "Workplace Safety Performance: Conscientiousness, Cognitive Failure, and Their interaction" 8 : 316-327, 2003

8 van der Linden, D, "Work stress and attentional difficulties: An initial study on burnout and cognitive failures" 19 (19): 23-36, 2005

9 Goldberg,L.R, "The structure of phenotypic personality traits" 48 : 26-43, 1993

10 Royle, J, "The everyday memory questionnaire-revised: Development of a 13-item scale" 30 : 114-121, 2008

11 Wallace, J. C, "The cognitive failures questionnaire revisited: Dimensions and Correlates" 129 : 238-256, 2002

12 Broadbent, D. E, "The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates" 21 : 1-16, 1982

13 Groome, D, "Retrival-induced forgetting is inversely related to everyday cognitive failures" 96 : 313-319, 2005

14 Matthews, G, "Relationships between anxiety, self-consciousness, and cognitive failure" 2 : 123-132, 1988

15 Wallace, J. C, "Predicting cognitive failures from boredom proneness and daytime sleepiness scores: an investigation within military and undergraduate samples" 34 : 635-644, 2003

16 Hough, L. M, "Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations, in Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations" Jossey Bass 31-88, 1996

17 Schneider, R. J, "Personality and industrial/organizatinal psychology, in International review of industrial and organizational psychology" Wiley 75-129, 1995

18 Matthews, G, "Multiple factors of cognitive failure and their relationships with stress vulnerability" 12 : 49-65, 1990

19 Meiran, N., "Individual differences in self reported cognitive failures: The attention hypothesis revisted" 17 : 727-739, 1994

20 Tipper, S. T, "Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure" 8 : 667-675, 1987

21 Larson, G. E, "Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the cognitive failures questionnaire" 88 : 29-38, 1997

22 Merckelbach, H, "Fantasy proneness and cognitive failures as correlates of dissociative experiences" 26 : 961-967, 1999

23 Pollina, L. K, "Dimensions of everyday memory in young adulthood" 83 : 305-321, 1992

24 Wallace,J.C, "Confirmatory factor analysis of the cognitive failures questionnaire: Evidence for dimensionality and construct validity" 37 : 307-324, 2004

25 Mecacci, L, "Cognitive failures, metacognitive beliefs and aging" 40 : 1453-1459, 2006

26 Norman,D.A, "Categorization of action slips" 88 : 1-15, 1981

27 Wallace, J. C, "Can accidents and industrial mishaps be predicted? Further investigation into the relationship between cognitve fialure and reports of accidents" 17 : 503-514, 2003

28 Martin,M, "Ageing and patterns of change in everyday memory and cognition" 5 : 63-74, 1986

29 Reason, J, "Absent-mindedness in shops: Its incidence, correlates, and consequences" 23 : 121-131, 1984