유럽연합의 공동통상정책과 앨리슨 모델의 확대적용 가능성에 관한 연구 = EU Common Commercial Policy and the Possibility of Transformation in Allison's Model

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In regard to the Common Commercial Policy(CCP) as the external dimension of the development of the European internal market, this policy has been one of the most important means of promoting European interests through its external economic relations. One of the main internal factors constraining CCP is the social and economic condition in the European countries. CCP involves a continuous process of negotiation and compromise between the various actors concerned.
The objective of this study is to analyze the policy-making process of CCP of EU, trying to apply Allison's Model to CCP. To analyze of this, the feature of Allison's Bureaucratic Politics Model is rearranged the past model centered on bureaucratic power. Because Allison's Bureaucratic Politics Model focused on ‘formal behavior’, but ignored ‘informal behavior’ such as Multinational Corporation. The basic behavior presupposed by this model is ‘a single unified actor’, but this model doesn't consider complexities of political interest by ‘informal actor’, Then this study enlarged and transformed this model in order to analyze effectively the policy-making process of the CCP.
This study also dealt with the relation between the protectionism and institutions.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 논문의 연구대상은 유럽연합의 공동통상정책이며, 통상정책 결정과정에는 역내 경제하부를 발전시키기 위한 산업정책적 고려, 유럽연합 차원의 보편적 이익 제공이라는 사회정책적 고려, 그리고 비관세 장벽구조를 결정하는 규제정책적 고려가 포함되어 있다. 그간 관료집단에 비길만한 대안적 정치세력이 존재하지 않는 상황에서 관료정치모델은 그 적실성이 인정되어 왔다. 그러나 27개국으로 확대된 유럽연합은 상황변화로 인하여 기존의 관료정치적 분석은 한계를 가질 수밖에 없다. 따라서 본 논문은 관료정치모델의 기본 틀에 정책결정과정에 영향을 미치는 행위자 측면에서의 확장의 필요성을 제기하고자 했다. 일반적으로 유럽연합 국가들의 산업경쟁력 저하, 경제성장률 둔화, 실업 증가 등이 유럽연합의 공동통상정책을 결정하는 구조적 제약 요인으로 작용한다. 이 결과 유럽기업의 이익이 정책결정에 최우선으로 반영될 수가 있었다. 유럽연합의 집행위원회는 공동정책수단을 제안함으로써 경제성장, 고용 등 가장 중요한 행위자인 기업가를 보호하려는 측면이 강하게 나타난다. 왜냐하면 유럽연합체제에 있어서 기업행위의 감소는 심각한 정치적 문제들을 야기 시키기 때문이다. 따라서 유럽산업의 상대적 지위약화는 집행위원회로 하여금 통상문제에 적극적 개입을 유도하고 기업 및 산업의 이해를 보호하고 지원해야하는 구조적 환경에 노출 될 수밖에 없다. 이에 본 논문은 앨리슨(Graham T. Allison) 정책결정모델의 행위자 측면에서의 확장을 통해 보호무역주의의 원인을 초국적 기업의 의사결정 참여를 보장한 제도라는 요인에서 찾아보았다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이종원, "최신 EU(유럽연합)론: 유럽화와 EU확대, 그리고 비즈니스" 서울: 해남 2001

2 방청록, "유럽통합의 정체와 제도화과정에 대한 연구방법의 모색" 2003

3 송병준, "유럽연합의 선택: 통합에서 다층적 통치로의 전환" 서울: 청목 2004

4 이종원, "새 유럽통합론" 서울: 해남 2004

5 Egeberg, Morten, "Transcending Intergovernmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision-Making" 6 (6): 456-474, 1999

6 "Trade Policy Lobbing in the European Union: Who Captures Whom?" Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.

7 "The Power of Institutions: State and Interest Group Activity in the European Union" 5 (5): 441-466, 2004

8 "The External Relations of the European Communities: A Manual of Law and Practice" Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.

9 Egeberg, Morten, "The European Commission-the evolving EU executive, Advanced Research on the Europeanisation of the Nation-State" (WP 02/30) : 19-, 2003

10 Elsig, Manfred, "The EU's Common Commercial Policy: Institutions, Interests, and Ideas" Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited 2002.

11 Denza, Eileen, "The Community as a Member of International Organization" 3-14, 1996

12 Allison, "T. Graham. Essence of Decision" 1971.

13 "Roger. To move to a nation The politics of foreign policy in the administration of John F. Kennedy. New York" Doubleday 1967.

14 "Philip. Leadership in Administration. A Sociological Interpretation. Berkeley Berkeley University of California Press" 1957.

15 "Peopl The European Business Environment" London: Macmillan Press Ltd 3-9, 2004

16 "Patrick A.. “The Political Economy of Protectionism" 480-485, 1981

17 "Patrick A.. “Bureaucracies and the Political Economy of Protection Reflection of a Continental Europe.” World Bank Staff Working Papers. No. 568" 1983

18 Heyes, "P. Jonh. Making Trade Policy in the European Community. New York" Palgrave Macmillan 1993.

19 Egeberg, Morten, "Organization and Nationality in the European Commission Services" Public Administration 1996.

20 Gulick, "Luther. “Notes on the Theory of Organization. With Special Reference to Government.” Luther Gulick and LF Urwich . Papers on the Science of Administration. New York Institute of Public Administration. Columbia University" 79-94, 1937

21 Goldstein, "Judish. “The Political Economy of Trade Institutions of Protection.” American Political Science Review. Vol. 80. No. 1" 161-184, 1986

22 Coen, David, "Insider and Outsider Lobbing in the European Commission" 4 (4): 165-189, 2003

23 "In the Maelstrom of Change: the Article 113 Committee in the Governance of External Economic Policy" Manchester: Manchester University Press 98-114, 2000

24 Hix, Simon, "Executive Selection in the European Union: Does the Commission President Investiture Procedure Reduce the Democratic Deficit?" 1 (1): 9-15, 1997

25 Dinan, Desmond, "Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration" London: Macmillan Press Ltd 1999.

26 "European Trade Policy Global Pressures and Domestic Constraints" Oxford: Oxford University Press 373-399, 2000

27 "EU protectionism on the rise? Trade policy decision-making, firm-level lobbying, and the impact of enlargement" Lotharstr: University of Duisburg-Essen 1-25, 2004

28 Baldwin, "E. Robert. “The Political Economy of Protection University of Chicago Press" 263-286, 1982

29 "Devuyst Youri. “The EC's Common Commercial Policy and the Treaty on European Union An Overview of the Negotiations.” World Competition. Vol. 16. No. 2" 67-80, 1992

30 Bouwen, Pieter, "Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access" 9 (9): 365-390, 2002

31 "Competitive Co-operation and EU-US Relations: Can the EU be a Strategic Partner for US in the World Political Economy?" 5 (5): 561-577, 1998

32 "Commission of the European Communities. “The European Community as a World Partner.” Bulletin of the European Communities. Supplement. Vol. 2. No. 86" 1993

33 "Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union" Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001.

34 "Austrian leader calls for EU Tax" 2006

35 "Article 113 Committee Plays Key Role in Determining Community Position.” Europe" 24-25, sep/oct.1985