RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      특허취득 및 디자인등록 공시에 따른 기업가치의 변화와 매출력 및 원가력의 매개효과

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856694

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examines the effect of patent acquisition and design registration on firm value, sales, and costs. Especially, using a structural equation model(PLS), the paper investigates a mediating role of sales and costs on stock price of the firm. For empirical investigation, we use 544 sample of patent acquisitions and 599 sample of design registrations filed in DART(Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer System) and KIPRIS(Korea Intellectual Property Rights Information Service) over the period of 2001-2005. We measure the change of firm value as cumulative abnormal return(CAR), and the changes of sales and costs as abnormal sales growth(ASG) and abnormal cost growth(ACG), respectively. In addition, our paper uses financial status variables such as intangible asset ratio, market-to-book ratio, company size, debt ratio, advertising expenses, R&D expenditure, ROA, and listed market. Empirical results show that stock price reactions to the announcement of patent acquisition and design registration are positive and significant, and the reactions are more positive in patent acquisition. This implies that the firm value increases from both patent acquisition and design registration. Furthermore, we search factors or conditions under which the firm value increases by using multiple linear regressions. The firm value in the case of patent acquisition increases as the firm has lower market-to-book ratio and is listed in KOSDAQ, while the firm value in the case of design registration increases as the firm has more intangible assets and higher profitability. In addition, we find that ASG is significantly positive and ACG is significantly negative for the firms that announce patent acquisition and design registration. The mediating role of ASG and ACG on firm value is investigated by PLS. The results show that the effect of patent acquisition on firm value is mediated by ASG, while the effect of cost reduction on firm value is not statistically significant. When we compare patent acquisition with design registration, patent acquisition makes a larger cost reduction. Also, the overall effect(including indirect effect) of patent acquisition compared to design registration on firm value is significantly larger, even though the direct effect on firm value is not significantly larger. This study is expected to help foster inter-disciplinary research in that we consider the mediating role of sales and costs in analyzing the effect of patent acquisition and design registration on firm value. Sales and costs play the role of bridge points between business strategy and firm value, in order to find out a path from business strategy to firm value. Another contribution of this paper is that we employ financial accounting data instead of judgment data that has been used in Marketing and Business Strategy research. However, this paper has limitations due to data unavailability. For example, we were unable to utilize more specific information on patent acquisition and design registration in the cross-sectional analysis of CARs. In the follow-up research, we will further examine whether the firm`s public relations associated with patent acquisition and design registration have any differential effect on firm value.
      번역하기

      This study examines the effect of patent acquisition and design registration on firm value, sales, and costs. Especially, using a structural equation model(PLS), the paper investigates a mediating role of sales and costs on stock price of the firm. Fo...

      This study examines the effect of patent acquisition and design registration on firm value, sales, and costs. Especially, using a structural equation model(PLS), the paper investigates a mediating role of sales and costs on stock price of the firm. For empirical investigation, we use 544 sample of patent acquisitions and 599 sample of design registrations filed in DART(Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer System) and KIPRIS(Korea Intellectual Property Rights Information Service) over the period of 2001-2005. We measure the change of firm value as cumulative abnormal return(CAR), and the changes of sales and costs as abnormal sales growth(ASG) and abnormal cost growth(ACG), respectively. In addition, our paper uses financial status variables such as intangible asset ratio, market-to-book ratio, company size, debt ratio, advertising expenses, R&D expenditure, ROA, and listed market. Empirical results show that stock price reactions to the announcement of patent acquisition and design registration are positive and significant, and the reactions are more positive in patent acquisition. This implies that the firm value increases from both patent acquisition and design registration. Furthermore, we search factors or conditions under which the firm value increases by using multiple linear regressions. The firm value in the case of patent acquisition increases as the firm has lower market-to-book ratio and is listed in KOSDAQ, while the firm value in the case of design registration increases as the firm has more intangible assets and higher profitability. In addition, we find that ASG is significantly positive and ACG is significantly negative for the firms that announce patent acquisition and design registration. The mediating role of ASG and ACG on firm value is investigated by PLS. The results show that the effect of patent acquisition on firm value is mediated by ASG, while the effect of cost reduction on firm value is not statistically significant. When we compare patent acquisition with design registration, patent acquisition makes a larger cost reduction. Also, the overall effect(including indirect effect) of patent acquisition compared to design registration on firm value is significantly larger, even though the direct effect on firm value is not significantly larger. This study is expected to help foster inter-disciplinary research in that we consider the mediating role of sales and costs in analyzing the effect of patent acquisition and design registration on firm value. Sales and costs play the role of bridge points between business strategy and firm value, in order to find out a path from business strategy to firm value. Another contribution of this paper is that we employ financial accounting data instead of judgment data that has been used in Marketing and Business Strategy research. However, this paper has limitations due to data unavailability. For example, we were unable to utilize more specific information on patent acquisition and design registration in the cross-sectional analysis of CARs. In the follow-up research, we will further examine whether the firm`s public relations associated with patent acquisition and design registration have any differential effect on firm value.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박준수, "특허취득의 공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구-코스닥시장을 중심으로-" 단국대학교 2003

      2 김민조, "특허출원의 공시와 주식가치" 12 : 121-142, 1995

      3 조용도, "특허공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구" 단국대학교 2004

      4 김현웅, "산업재산권의 기업화 촉진방향에 관한 연구-특허발명 중심으로-" 단국대학교 2003

      5 정형찬, "사건연구방법론에서 소표본 문제와 모형의 검정력" 35 (35): 107-139, 2006

      6 이동규, "무형자산의 기업가치 관련성에 관한 실증연구" 81-117, 2003

      7 임학빈, "무형자산의 가치측정과 측정치의 비교" 58-79, 2003

      8 산업자원부/한국디자인진흥원, "디자인 산업현황조사 결과" 산업자원부/한국디자인진흥원 2005

      9 황운진, "기업의 산업재산권 관리에 관한 연구-특허권을 중심으로-" 서울여자대학교 2003

      10 삼성경제연구소, "굿 디자인의 조건과 기업의 대응, CEO Information" 삼성경제연구소 2005

      1 박준수, "특허취득의 공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구-코스닥시장을 중심으로-" 단국대학교 2003

      2 김민조, "특허출원의 공시와 주식가치" 12 : 121-142, 1995

      3 조용도, "특허공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구" 단국대학교 2004

      4 김현웅, "산업재산권의 기업화 촉진방향에 관한 연구-특허발명 중심으로-" 단국대학교 2003

      5 정형찬, "사건연구방법론에서 소표본 문제와 모형의 검정력" 35 (35): 107-139, 2006

      6 이동규, "무형자산의 기업가치 관련성에 관한 실증연구" 81-117, 2003

      7 임학빈, "무형자산의 가치측정과 측정치의 비교" 58-79, 2003

      8 산업자원부/한국디자인진흥원, "디자인 산업현황조사 결과" 산업자원부/한국디자인진흥원 2005

      9 황운진, "기업의 산업재산권 관리에 관한 연구-특허권을 중심으로-" 서울여자대학교 2003

      10 삼성경제연구소, "굿 디자인의 조건과 기업의 대응, CEO Information" 삼성경제연구소 2005

      11 김영찬, "고객만족도 측정방법론과 전략적활용" 18 (18): 113-132, 2003

      12 Campbell-Hunt,Colin, "What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A metaanalysis" 21 : 127-154, 2000

      13 Fornell, C., "Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory" 19 : 440-452, 1982

      14 Russell Davidson, "The size and power of bootstrap tests" Queen’s University, Department of Economics 1996

      15 Banz,R.W., "The relationship between return and market value of common stock" 9 : 3-18, 1981

      16 Jennings, R, "The relation between accounting goodwill numbers and equity values" 513-533, 1996

      17 Simon, C., "The measurement and determinants of brand equity:a financial approach" 12 : 28-52, 1993

      18 Miller,D., "The generic strategy trap" 13 (13): 37-41, 1992

      19 Buzzell,R.D., "The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance" Collier Macmillan 1987

      20 Keller,Kevin Lane, "Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity" Prentice-Hall,Inc. 1998

      21 Jen,F., "Some new evidence on why companies use convertible bonds" 10 : 44-53, 1997

      22 "Ringle, Christian, Sven Wende, and Alexander Will"

      23 Brandy,Michael K., "Performanceonly measurement of service quality:a replication and extension" 55 : 17-31, 2002

      24 Geladi, P., "Partial least square regression:A tutorial" 35 : 1-17, 1986

      25 Choi, W., "Market valuation of intangible assets" 34-45, 2000

      26 Aaker,David A., "Managing Brand Equity" The Free Press 1991

      27 Whyte, J., "Investing in design to improve export potential" SPRU, University of Sussex 2002

      28 Wold,H., "Introduction to the second generation of multivariate analysis in Theoretical Empiricism" Paragon House 7-15, 1989

      29 Stewart,T.A., "Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organization" Doubleday Publishing Co. 1997

      30 Gemser, G, "How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance" 2001

      31 Fama,E., "Efficient Capital Market:A review of theory and empirical work" 1970

      32 Ohlson,J., "Earnings,book values,and dividends in equity valuation" 661-687, 1995

      33 이수동, "EDI 도입성과 결정요인 및 문제해결 방안에 관한 연구" 28 (28): 1003-1026, 1999

      34 Mackie,J., "Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions?" 45 : 1471-1493, 1990

      35 Grullon, G, "Dividends, share repurchases, and the substitution hypothesis" 57 : 1649-1684, 2002

      36 Hill,Charles W., "Differentiation Versus low cost or differentiation and low cost:A contingence framework" 13 (13): 401-412, 1988

      37 Mozota,Brigitte, "Design as a strategic management tool" 73-84, 1990

      38 Mozota,Brigitte, "Design and competitive edge: A model for design management excellence in European SMEs" 88-104, 2002

      39 DTI Economics, "Creativity, Design, and Business Performance" 2005

      40 Bhagat,S., "Corporate research and development investments: International comparisons" 19 : 443-470, 1995

      41 Eisenhardt,Kathleen M., "Control:Organizational and economic approaches" 31 (31): 134-149, 1985

      42 Porter,M., "Competitive Strategy" Free Press 1980

      43 Porter,M., "Competitive Advantage" Free Press 1985

      44 Efron,B., "Bootstrap methods:Another look at the Jackknife" 7 (7): 1-26, 1979

      45 "BlueRun"

      46 Fornell, C., "Assumption of the two-step approach to latent variable modeling" 20 : 291-320, 1992

      47 Park, Chan Su, "A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility" 68 : 271-288, 1994

      48 이건창, "6시그마 경영활동으로 인한 기업경쟁력 향상에 관한 실증연구" 33 (33): 1735-1756, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼