授業獎學의 評價機能에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Evaluation System as a Function of Instructional Supervision

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  The purpose of this study was to identify the descriptive characteristics of the evaluation system as a function of instructional supervision in school organization.
  To accomplish this purpose, the related literatures were reviewed in terms of (1) purposes of evaluation, (2) objects of evaluation, (3) evaluators, (4) method, process, and procedures of evaluation, and (5) instruments.
  The following characteristics were identified as results of this study.
  (1) In general, evaluation system has been gradually concerned as an important function of instructional supervision since 1980s in the United States.
  (2) The purpose of evaluation of instructional supervisions has been mainly to improve the quality of instruction. However, it seems to be changing and gradually emphasizing on administrative purpose and improvement of instructional programs as well.
  (3) The objects of evaluation system was mainly to appraise the outcomes of teaching but they are gradually changing to focus on teacher"s teaching behavior and instructional program in school as well.
  (4) Evaluators of the instructional supervision might be administrators, supervisors, evaluation specialists, teachers themselves, students, peer teachers and parents. Especially self-evaluation was recognized as very useful and supplementary to administrative evaluation.
  (5) The rating scale, ability test, and observation were known as useful methods to measure the objects to be evaluated. The conferences were also used as an effective evaluation process in the United States but rarely used in Korea.
  (6) Various types of evaluation instruments were used on the basis of different evaluation criteria, purposes, evaluators, and processes. However, typical instrument for evaluation was composed of items to measure the quality of teacher, professional growth, and teacher"s competence and performance.
  From the results, the followings were suggested.
  (1) The evaluation system as a function of instructional supervision should be developed and used for not only administrative purposes but also improvement of teaching behavior and instructional program.
  (2) The current evaluation system in Korea should be examined to improve the measuring system which could not evaluate the teacher"s teaching behavior on the basis of competence and performance.
  (3) An applicable model of evaluation system for instructional supervision should be developed by university researchers and evaluation specialists and examined to be used by supervisors, administrators, and teachers.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 緖論
  Ⅱ. 授業？學과 評價機能
  Ⅲ. 授業？學에서의 評價體制
  Ⅳ. 要約 및 結言
  〈參考文獻〉
  〈부록〉
  〈Summary〉