RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research aims at suggesting exposure condition that shows maintaining the value of the physical image quality factor by decreasing tube voltage and tube current from the standard exposure condition(80 kV, 7 mA) of a CBCT apparatus. To measure the value of the physical image quality factor, modular transfer function(MTF) was analyzed and dose-area product(DAP) was used for the measurement of exposure dose. CBCT images of a Sedentex IQ phantom were obtained under 15 exposure conditions of different combination of tube voltage(80, 78, 76 kV) and tube current(7, 6, 5, 4, 3 mA) and MTF 10 was calculated under each exposure conditions. There were no significant differences in MTF 10 under 80 kV-6 mA, 80 kV-5 mA exposure conditions in comparison with standard exposure condition. Based on the results of this research, 80 kV-5 mA condition are expected to be able to reduce exposure dose with maintaining the value of the physical image quality factor of the standard exposure condition.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 CBCT 장비의 표준 노출 조건(80 kV, 7 mA)을 기준으로 관전압과 관전류를 낮추어 촬영하면서 표준 노출 조건의 물리적 화질 요소값을 유지할 수 있는 노출 조건의 제시를 목표로 두고...

본 연구는 CBCT 장비의 표준 노출 조건(80 kV, 7 mA)을 기준으로 관전압과 관전류를 낮추어 촬영하면서 표준 노출 조건의 물리적 화질 요소값을 유지할 수 있는 노출 조건의 제시를 목표로 두고자한다. 영상의 물리적 화질 요소값의 측정을 위해 변조전달함수(MTF)가 분석되었고 선량 측정을 위해 선량-면적 곱(DAP)을 이용하였다. 관전압(80, 78, 76 kV)과 관전류(7, 6, 5, 4, 3 mA)의 15가지 조합의 노출 조건에서 Sedentex IQ 팬텀 (Leeds Test Objects Ltd., Boroughbridge, UK)의 CBCT 영상을 얻었고 MTF 10이 각 조건에서 계산 되었다. 표준 노출 조건과 비교시 80 kV-6 mA, 80 kV-5 mA 노출 조건은 MTF 10에 있어 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았기에 본 연구에서 사용된 CBCT 장비의 경우, 80 kV-5 mA로 낮춘 노출 조건에서 물리적 화질 요소값을 유지하면서 선량을 감소시킬 수 있는 것으로 판단되어진다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172. pdf"

2 Jin-Woo Choi, "Relationship between physical factors and subjective image quality of cone-beam computed tomography images according to diagnostic task" Elsevier BV 119 (119): 357-365, 2015

3 박하나, "Optimization of exposure parameters and relationship between subjective and technical image quality in cone-beam computed tomography" 대한영상치의학회 49 (49): 139-151, 2019

4 Satomi Nakahara, "One-year analysis of Elekta CBCT image quality using NPS and MTF" Wiley 17 (17): 211-222, 2016

5 Yoshihiro Ozaki, "Location dependency of the spatial resolution of cone beam computed tomography for dental use" Elsevier BV 116 (116): 648-655, 2013

6 Sara M Elkhateeb, "Image quality assessment of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT phantom" British Institute of Radiology 45 (45): 20160075-, 2016

7 최진우, "Factors affecting modulation transfer function measurements in cone-beam computed tomographic images" 대한영상치의학회 49 (49): 131-137, 2019

8 Sara Lofthag-Hansen, "Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view" Elsevier BV 80 (80): 483-488, 2011

9 A. Suomalainen, "Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners" 38 (38): 367-378, 2009

10 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Diagnostic Reference Level guideline – Dental Radiography"