Mg–Al–Zn–Ca–Y (SEN) alloys have been recently developed by adding small amounts of Ca and Y to commercial Mg–Al–Zn (AZ series) alloys. These alloys possess superior corrosion and ignition resistances to their commercial AZ seriescounterpar...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108151739
Jae Won Cha (Kyungpook National University) ; Ye Jin Kim (Kyungpook National University) ; Young Min Kim (Korea Institute of Materials Science) ; Jun Ho Bae (Korea Institute of Materials Science) ; Sung Hyuk Park (Kyungpook National University)
2022
English
KCI등재,SCI,SCIE,SCOPUS
학술저널
385-396(12쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Mg–Al–Zn–Ca–Y (SEN) alloys have been recently developed by adding small amounts of Ca and Y to commercial Mg–Al–Zn (AZ series) alloys. These alloys possess superior corrosion and ignition resistances to their commercial AZ seriescounterpar...
Mg–Al–Zn–Ca–Y (SEN) alloys have been recently developed by adding small amounts of Ca and Y to commercial Mg–Al–Zn (AZ series) alloys. These alloys possess superior corrosion and ignition resistances to their commercial AZ seriescounterparts. Here, commercial AZ91 (Mg–9Al–0.8Zn, wt%) and developed SEN9 (Mg–9Al–0.8Zn–0.3Ca–0.2Y, wt%)alloys are extruded under the same conditions, and the microstructure, tensile properties, and high-cycle fatigue propertiesof the extruded alloys are compared. The extruded SEN9 alloy has a smaller average grain size and higher microstructuralhomogeneity than the extruded AZ91 alloy because the Al2Y,Al2Ca,and Al8Mn4Yparticles in the homogenized SEN9 billetpromote dynamic recrystallization during extrusion. Despite their different microstructures, the two alloys possess similartensile strengths because the strong precipitation hardening in the extruded AZ91 alloy is offset by strong grain-boundaryhardening in the extruded SEN9 alloy. However, the extruded SEN9 alloy exhibits higher tensile elongation because deformationtwinning is suppressed by the finer grains. The fatigue strength of the extruded SEN9 alloy (100 MPa) is slightlylower than that of the extruded AZ91 alloy (110 MPa). For the extruded AZ91 alloy, fatigue cracks initiate on the surfacein all specimens, whereas for the extruded SEN9 alloy, fatigue cracks initiate in an Al2Caor Al2Yparticle present on thesubsurface in some specimens, especially at low stress amplitudes. The Al2Caand Al2Yparticles are larger than the Mg17Al12precipitates, and considerably harder than the matrix. Consequently, local stress is highly concentrated in these particlesduring cyclic loading, which eventually causes premature fatigue cracking and decreased fatigue resistance.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 W. M. Fassell, 3 : 522-, 1951
2 D. R. Ni, 61 : 568-, 2009
3 P. Lukáš, 85 : 67-, 1987
4 A. W. Thompson, 5 : 859-, 1971
5 A. W. Thompson, 19 : 597-, 1971
6 J. F. Adams, 93 : 372-, 2016
7 A. Weidner, 435–436 : 540-, 2006
8 D. J. Morrison, 19 : 51-, 1997
9 K. S. Chan, 32 : 1428-, 2010
10 M. A. Meyers, 49 : 4025-, 2001
1 W. M. Fassell, 3 : 522-, 1951
2 D. R. Ni, 61 : 568-, 2009
3 P. Lukáš, 85 : 67-, 1987
4 A. W. Thompson, 5 : 859-, 1971
5 A. W. Thompson, 19 : 597-, 1971
6 J. F. Adams, 93 : 372-, 2016
7 A. Weidner, 435–436 : 540-, 2006
8 D. J. Morrison, 19 : 51-, 1997
9 K. S. Chan, 32 : 1428-, 2010
10 M. A. Meyers, 49 : 4025-, 2001
11 M. R. Barnett, 59 : 696-, 2008
12 M. R. Barnett, 52 : 5093-, 2004
13 D. Ando, 58 : 4316-, 2010
14 M. R. Barnett, 464 : 8-, 2007
15 S. G. Hong, 58 : 5873-, 2010
16 N. J. Petch, 174 : 25-, 1953
17 E. O. Hall, 64 : 747-, 1951
18 Y. J. Kim, 707 : 620-, 2017
19 F. Czerwinski, 46 : 377-, 2004
20 J. D. Robson, 31 : 257-, 2015
21 G. L. Song, 1 : 11-, 1999
22 G. Song, 9 : 177-, 2007
23 N. B. Pillings, 29 : 529-, 1923
24 Y. M. Kim, 65 : 958-, 2011
25 G. Ballerini, 47 : 2173-, 2005
26 R. Ambat, 42 : 1433-, 2000
27 A. E. Coy, 52 : 3896-, 2010
28 S. K. Woo, 166 : 108451-, 2020
29 S. M. Baek, 118 : 227-, 2017
30 Y. J. Kim, 93 : 41-, 2021
31 J. S. Suh, 207 : 908-, 2017
32 F. J. Humphreys, 25 : 1323-, 1977
33 M. Ferry, 44 : 3089-, 1996
34 Y. Go, 739 : 69-, 2018
35 S. H. Kim, 725 : 309-, 2018
36 M. Horynová, 45 : 253-, 2013
37 F. Lv, 33 : 672-, 2011
38 A. N. Chamos, 31 : 812-, 2008
39 S. Fintová, 42 : 219-, 2015
40 S. W. Bae, 766 : 748-, 2018
41 S. H. Kim, 703 : 1-, 2017
42 J. Y. Li, 22 : 1028-, 2012
43 J. G. Jung, 93 : 8-, 2014
44 S. H. Kim, 8 (8): 5254-, 2019
45 H. Yu, 559 : 798-, 2013
46 S. H. Park, 545 : 139-, 2012
47 F.J. Humphreys, "Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena" Elsevier 2004
48 Hongge Yan ; Xiaole Gong ; Jihua Chen ; Meixin Cheng, "Microstructure, Texture Characteristics, Mechanical and Bio-Corrosion Properties of High Strain Rate Rolled Mg–Zn–Sr Alloys" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 2249-2263, 2021
49 J. A. Liu ; J. Wang ; M. L. Yang ; Y. M. Yao, "Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg–8Y–2Ho–2Zn Alloy with Long Period Stacking Ordered Phase" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 1613-1619, 2021
50 G.E. Dieter, "Mechanical Metallurgy" McGraw-Hill Book Company 1998
51 E.F. Horst, "Magnesium Technology: Metallurgy, Design Data, Application" Springer-Verlag 2006
52 Y. M. Kim, "Magnesium Technology 2012" John Wiley & Sons 217-, 2012
53 Qiyu Liao ; Wenxin Hu ; Qichi Le ; Xingrui Chen ; Yanchao Jiang, "Improvement of Yield Asymmetry and Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of Extruded AZ110 Alloy with La-Rich Misch Metal Addition" 대한금속·재료학회 28 (28): 1143-1156, 2022
54 S. Suresh, "Fatigue of Materials" Cambridge University Press 1998
55 Yan Zehua ; Yu Yandong ; Qian Jiahao ; Luo Junting ; Sang Yanchao, "Fabrication of High-Strength Mg–Gd–Nd–Zn–Sn–Zr Alloy via Extrusion and Aging" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 4182-4194, 2021
56 Dong Hee Lee ; Sang‑Hoon Kim ; Hyun Ji Kim ; Byoung Gi Moon ; Young Min Kim ; Sung Hyuk Park, "Effects of Extrusion Speed on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg–9Al–0.8Zn–0.9Ca–0.6Y–0.5MM Alloy" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 530-537, 2021
57 Dhananjay Dubey ; Kondababu Kadali ; Harikrishna Kancharla ; Anuz Zindal ; Jayant Jain ; K. Mondal ; Sudhanshu S. Singh, "Effect of Precipitate Characteristics on the Corrosion Behavior of a AZ80 Magnesium Alloy" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 3282-3292, 2021
58 Dongdong Gu ; Jian Peng ; Jiawen Wang ; Fusheng Pan, "Effect of Mn Modification on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Alloy with Low Gd Content" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 1483-1492, 2021
59 Seyed Masih Mousavizadeh ; Seyed Hadi Tabaian, "Effect of Mn Addition on Corrosion and Biocompatibility Characteristics of a New Biodegradable Mg–1Ca–2Zn–1RE Alloy" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 5074-5081, 2021
60 Tao Zhu ; Xinghua Gong ; Ying Xiong ; Xiaxia Hu, "Effect of Initial Orientation on Corrosion Behavior of AZ80 Magnesium Alloy in Simulated Body Fluid" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 2645-2655, 2021
61 Omid Sadeddin ; Mohammad Moazami‑Goudarzi ; Mohammad Javad Nayyeri, "Effect of Hot Extrusion on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg–5Sn–xZr Alloys" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 4996-5007, 2021
62 S. M. Banijamali ; Y. Palizdar ; S. Najafi ; A. Sheikhani ; M. Soltan Ali Nezhad ; P. Valizadeh Moghaddam ; H. Torkamani, "Effect of Ce Addition on the Tribological Behavior of ZK60 Mg-Alloy" 대한금속·재료학회 27 (27): 2732-2742, 2021
63 Jin‑Kyung Jeon ; Hyunseon Seo ; Jimin Park ; Soo Ji Son ; Yeong Rim Kim ; Eun Shil Kim ; Jong Woong Park ; Woong‑Gyo Jung ; Hojeong Jeon ; Yu‑Chan Kim ; Hyun‑Kwang Seok ; Jae Ho Shin ; Myoung‑Ryul Ok, "Conceptual Study for Tissue-Regenerative Biodegradable Magnesium Implant Integrated with Nitric Oxide-Releasing Nanofi bers" 대한금속·재료학회 25 (25): 1098-1107, 2019
Adhesion Strength Prediction of CrAlN Coating on Al–Si Alloy (LM28): Fuzzy Modelling
Lightweight, Refractory High-Entropy Alloy, CrNbTa0.25TiZr, with High Yield Strength
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2009-12-29 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 대한금속ㆍ재료학회 -> 대한금속·재료학회 | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | SCI 등재 (등재유지) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2.05 | 0.91 | 1.31 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
1.03 | 0.86 | 0.678 | 0.22 |