본 연구는 기업부실화 예측을 위하여 활용되어 왔던 의사결정트리, 인공신경망 및 Support Vector Machine(SVM) 등의 기계학습에 대하여 앙상블 학습을 적용한 성과를 비교하였다. 실험 결과 단일 ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77010020
2009
-
부스팅 ; 배깅 ; 의사결정트리 ; 인공신경망 ; SVM ; Support Vector Machine ; 기업부실화 예측 ; Boosting ; Bagging ; DT ; Decision Tree ; NN ; Neural Networks ; Bankruptcy Prediction
020.1305
KCI등재
학술저널
41-49(9쪽)
7
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
본 연구는 기업부실화 예측을 위하여 활용되어 왔던 의사결정트리, 인공신경망 및 Support Vector Machine(SVM) 등의 기계학습에 대하여 앙상블 학습을 적용한 성과를 비교하였다. 실험 결과 단일 ...
본 연구는 기업부실화 예측을 위하여 활용되어 왔던 의사결정트리, 인공신경망 및 Support Vector Machine(SVM) 등의 기계학습에 대하여 앙상블 학습을 적용한 성과를 비교하였다. 실험 결과 단일 분류자에서는 SVM의 성과가 가장 우수하였으나, 앙상블 학습을 적용한 결과는 의사결정트리의 성과가 인공신경망 및 SVM에 비교하여 우수하였다. 성과 개선 측면에서도 의사결정트리 및 인공신경망의 경우에는 앙상블 학습으로 인한 성과 개선의 효과가 발생하였으나, SVM의 경우에는 앙상블 학습의 유의적인 성과 개선이 나타나지 않았다. 이러한 원인은 앙상블 분류자의 다중공선성에 기인하고 있으며, 이를 해결하기 위해서는 하위 앙상블 재선택 문제와 결합 문제가 동시에 고려되어야 함을 보여주었다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper performs an empirical comparison of three ensembles, each of which uses DT(Decision Trees), NN(Neural Networks) , and SVM(Support Vector Machine) as base classifiers on bankruptcy prediction. Experimental results show that SVM outperforms D...
This paper performs an empirical comparison of three ensembles, each of which uses DT(Decision Trees), NN(Neural Networks) , and SVM(Support Vector Machine) as base classifiers on bankruptcy prediction. Experimental results show that SVM outperforms DT and NN, while DT ensemble has higher accuracy than NN and SVM ensembles. Ensemble learning can significantly improve the performance of DT and NN, but it does not work well on SVM. The problem of selection and combination of sub-ensemble to resolve multicollinearity among base classifiers of ensemble is to be considered for the performance improvement of NN and SVM ensembles.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Shin, K, "n application of support vector machines in bankruptcy prediction" 28 : 127-135, 2005
2 Ravi, P, "ankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques- a review" 180 (180): 1-28, 2007
3 Shaw, M, "Using and expert system with inductive learning to evaluate business loans" (3) : 45-56, 1998
4 Schapire, R. E., "Theoretical views of boosting. Computational Learning Theory" EuroCOLT 1-10, 1999
5 Han, I., "The impact of measurement scale and correlation structure on classification performance of inductive learning and statistical methods" 10 (10): 209-221, 1996
6 Meyer, P. A, "Prediction of bank failures" 25 (25): 853-868, 1970
7 Pantalone, C, "Predicting commercial bank failure since deregulation" 37-47, 1987
8 Optiz, D, "Popular ensemble methods: an empirical study" 169-198, 1999
9 Hansen, L, "Neural network ensembles" 12 (12): 993-1001, 1990
10 Alfaro, E., "Multiclass corporate failure prediction by AdaBoost.M1" 13 (13): 301-312, 2007
1 Shin, K, "n application of support vector machines in bankruptcy prediction" 28 : 127-135, 2005
2 Ravi, P, "ankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques- a review" 180 (180): 1-28, 2007
3 Shaw, M, "Using and expert system with inductive learning to evaluate business loans" (3) : 45-56, 1998
4 Schapire, R. E., "Theoretical views of boosting. Computational Learning Theory" EuroCOLT 1-10, 1999
5 Han, I., "The impact of measurement scale and correlation structure on classification performance of inductive learning and statistical methods" 10 (10): 209-221, 1996
6 Meyer, P. A, "Prediction of bank failures" 25 (25): 853-868, 1970
7 Pantalone, C, "Predicting commercial bank failure since deregulation" 37-47, 1987
8 Optiz, D, "Popular ensemble methods: an empirical study" 169-198, 1999
9 Hansen, L, "Neural network ensembles" 12 (12): 993-1001, 1990
10 Alfaro, E., "Multiclass corporate failure prediction by AdaBoost.M1" 13 (13): 301-312, 2007
11 Buta, P, "Mining for financial knowledge with CBR" 9 (9): 34-41, 1994
12 Zmijewski,M.E, "Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models" 22 (22): 59-82, 1984
13 Pang, S, "Membership authentication in the dynamic group by face classification using SVM ensemble" 24 (24): 215-225, 2003
14 Min, S. H, "Hybrid genetic algorithms and support vector machines for bankruptcy prediction" 652-660, 2006
15 H. Bubke, "Hybrid Methods in Patter Recognition" World Scientific 2002
16 Altman, E. L, "Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy" 23 (23): 589-609, 1968
17 Beaver, W, "Financial ratios as predictors of failure, empirical research in accounting: Selected studied" 4 (4): 71-111, 1966
18 Ohlson, J, "Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy" 18 (18): 109-131, 1980
19 Freund, Y, "Experiments with a new boosting algorithm" 148-156, 1996
20 Lei, Z, "Ensemble of support vector machine for text-independent speaker recognition" 6 (6): 163-167, 2006
21 Kim, H. C, "Constructing support vector machine ensemble" 36 (36): 2757-2767, 2003
22 Laitinen, T, "Comparative analysis of failure prediction methods: the Finish case" 8 (8): 67-92, 1999
23 Buciu, I, "Combining support vector machines for accuracy face detection" ICIP 1054-1057, 2001
24 Quinlan, J. R., "C4.5: Programs for machine learning" San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann 1993
25 Wang, Y. Q, "Building credit scoring systems based on support-based support vector machine ensemble" 323-326, 2008
26 Evgeniou, T., "Bound on the generalization performance of kernel machine ensembles"
27 Schapire, R. E, "Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. Machine Learning" 322-330, 1997
28 Schwenk,H, "Boosting neural network" 12 (12): 1869-1887, 2000
29 Drucker, H., "Boosting decision trees" 1996
30 Freund, Y, "Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority" 121 (121): 256-285, 1995
31 Valentini, G, "Bias-variance analysis of support vector machines for the development of SVM-based ensemble methods" 725-775, 2004
32 Breiman, L, "Bias, variance and arcing classifiers" Berkeley: Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley 1996
33 Alfaro, E, "Bankruptcy forecasting: an empirical comparison of AdaBooost and neural networks" 45 (45): 110-122, 2008
34 Quinlan, J. R, "Bagging, boosting and C4.5. Machine Learning" 725-730, 1996
35 Breiman, L, "Bagging predictors" 24 (24): 123-140, 1994
36 Valentini, G, "Bagged ensembles of SVMs or gene expression data analysis" 1844-1849, 2003
37 Breiman, L, "Arcing the edge" Berkeley: Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley 1997
38 Breiman, L, "Arcing classifiers" 26 (26): 801-849, 1998
39 Fawcett, T, "An introduction to ROC analysis" 27 (27): 861-874, 2006
40 Valentini, G., "An experimental bias-variance analysis of SVM ensembles based on resampling techniques" 35 (35): 1252-1271, 2005
41 Maclin, R, "An empirical evaluation of bagging and boosting" 546-551, 1997
42 Bauer, E, "An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants" 36 (36): 105-139, 1999
43 B. Schoelkopf, "Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning" MIT Press 1998
44 Friedman, J, "Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting" Stanford: Department of Statistics, Stanford University. 1998
45 Eom, J. H, "AdaaCDSS-E: A classifier ensemble based clinical decision support systems for cardiovascular disease level prediction"
46 Dimitras, A. I, "A survey of business failure with an emphasis on prediction methods and industrial applications" 90 (90): 487-513, 1996
47 Altman, E. L, "A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations" 1 (1): 29-54, 1977
48 Odom, M, "A neural network for bankruptcy prediction" IEEE Press, San Diego, CA 1990
49 Freund, Y, "A decision theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting" 55 (55): 119-139, 1997
50 Dong, Y. S, "A comparison of several ensemble methods for text categorization" IEEE International Conference on Service Computing 2004
51 Banfield, R. E, "A comparison of decision tree ensemble creation techniques" 29 (29): 173-180, 2007
e-비즈니스 활용기업의 경영성과에 영향을 미치는 주요요인 분석에 관한 연구
기술준비도가 Self-Service Technology의 사용의도에 미치는 영향
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2020 | 평가예정 | 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가) | |
2019-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가) | |
2018-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.73 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.79 | 0.86 | 0.972 | 0.06 |