재건축에 관한 형사정책적 연구 -시공사 관련범죄 중심으로- = A Study on the Criminal Policy of Reconstruction -Focusing on Construction Companies' Crimes-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The crime associated with reconstruction is not limited to yesterday and today. The government attempted to curb the crime repeatedly through revisions of the law and crackdown, but the attempts always ended in failure. Was it because the behavior of the crime so sudden and contingent that it could not be effectively addressed? It was not at all. As revealed by the investigation repeatedly, it was the crime masterminded deliberately by the construction company from the beginning when it was selected for a project in coalescence with maintenance companies, design firms, union executives, and public officials. In the final analysis, the crimes related to reconstruction are structurally so conditioned to be a premeditated crime. If so, would not the crime be curbed if we change that structure? The present research focused on this and studied ways to structurally block crimes at the source. In order to find the cause of the crime, we analyzed various research papers and media press releases that have investigated the crime empirically and, as a result, confirmed that the reconstruction-related crime was structurally inevitable. In other words, crime is triggered by unprofessionalism of union members. This weakness is used by the construction companies for their own benefit, and therefore there is a need for a professional organization to act on behalf of unions that are unprofessional. In addition, it is our belief that if we avoid the union method which is mainly enforced by the unions and the public applicant method and utilize the trust method, in which the promotion committee and unions are omitted, and the public enforcer method, the crime will be reduced. As shown in the case of foreign countries, the governments are planning and controlling the reconstruction projects as public works projects. We believe that when adopting a combination of the trust method, which is not led by the private sector, and the public enforcer method before gradually moving to the public-led public enforcer method, we can also reduce crimes and contribute to the public interest.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정경만, "주택재건축사업에서 건설사업관리(CM)적용이 사업만족도에 미치는 영향" 광운대 2018

2 윤승현, "주택재건축사업 운영현황의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 건국대학교 부동산대학원 2013

3 유혁근, "주택재건축사업 범죄의 원인과 방지방안 연구" 광운대 2017

4 김종보, "정비사업의 시공자 선정과 형사처벌" 법학연구소 48 (48): 206-236, 2007

5 중앙일보, "재건축 조합원 1400명 전과자 만들 수 없지만 앞으로 예외 없다"

6 김진용, "재건축 사업의 효율적 추진을 위한 제도 개선방안" 건국대 2019

7 서울경제TV, "재건축 규제논란···외국은 어떻게 하나"

8 석희열, "재개발·재건축제도의 운영과 개선 방안에 관한 연구" 경남대 2018

9 아시아경제, "작년 국민소득 3만1000달러 상회"

10 국토교통부, "실수요 중심의 시장형성을 통한 주택시장의 안정적 관리 방안"

11 김성제, "신탁방식의 도시정비사업 현황과 개선과제, 국회입법처 발표자료"

12 하상호, "신탁방식에 의한 주택재건축의 활성화 방안 -강남3구를 중심으로-" 명지대 2017

13 이데일리, "설익은 제도 탓에... 서울 곳곳서 진통 겪는 ‘신탁방식 재건축"

14 KNS 뉴스통신, "서울시 공공관리제도, 투명성에 금이 가니 존재 명분도 ‘쩍’, 무너진 명분..이대로 가면 ‘5돌’ 맞기 전에 퇴출?"

15 서울북부지방검찰청, "서민을 울리는 수도권지역 재개발 비리사범 엄단 -뇌물을 수수한 재개발조합장 등 19명인지, 12명 구속-"

16 머니투데이, "부동산신탁사 정비사업 수주 허와 실은?"

17 조선일보, "독일에선··· 주민다수가 결정한 아파트보수, 분담금 안내면 소유권 박탈"

18 김수홍, "도시및주거환경정비법 일부 개정 법률안 심사보고서" 법제사법위원회 2017

19 김경민, "도시개발 길을 잃다" (주)시공사 2011

20 윤상조, "도시·주거환경 정비사업 제도개선방안 연구" 건국대 2018

21 김진수, "도시 및 주거환경정비사업의 공공관리제도 개선방안 연구 - 서울특별시 정비사업 공공관리제도 실증분석을 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 (62) : 33-47, 2015

22 "네이버뉴스"

23 Schwartz, AF, "Housing Policy in the United States"