RISS 검색 - 학위논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the age of globalization, frequent exchanges and activities of important persons for the benefit of each country are inevitable, and they are actively participating in various international events in various parts of the world, especially Southeast Asia.
As a new emerging market, the Korean government is pursuing a new southern policy targeting Southeast Asia, which has strategic value. However, the region is at risk for safety due to the instability of political, ethnic and religious dispute and conflicts, the internationalization of terrorism, and the influx of international terrorist groups Al Qaeda in Iraq(AQI) and Islamic State(IS), this is inherent.
In the trend of the era of international terrorism, important persons in Southeast Asia have become the main targets of terrorist groups, and if they face problems with their safety, they can cause tremendous international impacts as well as the fall of the country concerned.
The purpose of this study is to identify the essential causes of the personal threats of important persons people in Southeast Asia, and to provide improved measures in international cooperation and response to personal safety. In order to achieve this goal, the following contents were studied. First, the theoretical background of terrorism and the aspects and spread of terrorism are examined.
Second, the status of terrorism in the Southeast Asian region's religion, politics, and socio-economic aspects was identified.
Third, terrorism was compared and analyzed in four countries: Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia and Myanmar.
Fourth, as a case study, the failures and successes of important persons safety were analyzed at a large international event called the ASEAN + 3 Summit in Thailand in April and October 2009.
Fifth, international cooperation and countermeasures for the safety of important persons were presented.
As a research method, First, as a literature study, contents analysis was conducted through various literatures, materials, national records, white papers, publications, etc., focusing on international terrorism.
Second, as a case study, four countries in Southeast Asia and ASEAN + 3 Summit held in April and October 2009 in Thailand were studied using the SWOT(Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat) analysis method.
The results of the literature analysis through these studies are as follows: First, the cause of terrorism in Southeast Asia is the underdevelopment of the political system, the conflict between races and Islam in the post-colonial state construction process.
Second, after the Bali bombing in October 2002, conflicting sentiments among Muslims who were furious about the United States' anti-terrorism war spread to the United States and its allies, and this Muslim sentiment is linked to Islam in Southeast Asia.
Third, the activities of the international terrorist group Al Qaeda's Southeast Asian network and IS-related organizations increased.
Fourth, the important persons attending large-scale international events in Southeast Asia are targeted by international terrorist groups.
As a result of case analysis by country(Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Myanmar), the commonalities of the four countries are First, influenced in connection with international terrorist organizations.
Second, terrorist incidents important persons are continuously occurring in each country.
Third, cooperation between the United States and other countries through international cooperation with the United States through the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN), the consultative body in Southeast Asia, and the ASEAN Regional Forum(ARF) was discussed at a security level.
The differences, First, complex and different depending on the religious, political, socio-economic background of each country.
Second, there are different levels of countermeasures against terrorism depending on the internal and external conditions of each country, and in particular, Indonesia is a Muslim that most people believe in Islam, and anti-Islam policies are inherently limited.
Third, the agency responsible for the personal safety of important persons are operating as a mixed system of military, police, military and police as a different system by country.
As a result of the ASEAN + 3 summit case study in Thailand in 2009, the failure of April's event was canceled. Recognition of the uneasy situation of anti-government protests, lack of plans for the safety of important persons, and the responsibility of the agency in question are unclear. There was a lack of response guidance and responsible action by staff in the field.
Subsequent successes at the events in October of the same year presented a plan for the safety of the Thai government at the level of participation in the government, and established international security cooperation as well as careful preparations such as the establishment of the Security Coordination Planning Committee and the launch of domestic security laws. Through this, it was concluded that the event was safely completed important persons. the safety of the main personnel, First, specific and practical countermeasures were proposed for the latest attacking means such as drones, spontaneous terrorists such as 'lonely wolves' and evolving terrorism to be utilized in the field.
Second, in order to compensate the limitations from the public sector, such as the police, in the responsibility and role of safety affairs of important persons, efficient use of the private sector, such as security companies, was suggested.
Third, suggestions were made to use international councils, such as regular information exchange.
Fourth, common and essential contents necessary for international cooperation were presented in stages (preparation →execution → emergency).
The significance of this study was to confirm that the ultimate solution to the security of the important persons from international terrorism in Southeast Asia is the development of a political system called democracy in the region and the practice of peace thought to guarantee human dignity.
In addition, the safety of the important persons from international terrorism is an absolute task for the stability of each country and the international order. Through the results of these studies, it will contribute to the improvement of personal safety for the important persons in Southeast Asia and around the world, and the establishment of a stable international order and peace.

번역하기

국문 초록 (Abstract)

세계화 시대에 각 국가의 이익을 위한 주요인사의 빈번한 교류와 활동은 필연적 현상으로 이들은 세계 여러 지역, 특히 동남아시아의 다양한 국제행사에 적극적으로 참여하고 있다. 그러나 이 지역은 정치·종족·종교적 갈등과 분쟁에서 오는 불안정성, 테러리즘의 국제화 그리고 국제테러 단체인 알카에다(Al Qaeda)와 이슬람국가(Islamic State: IS)의 유입으로 안전에 위험이 내재되어 있다. 국제테러리즘 시대라는 흐름에서 동남아시아 지역에서의 주요인사들은 테러 단체의 주요 공격 목표가 되었고, 이들의 신변 안전에 문제가 발생한다면 관련 국가의 위신 추락은 물론이고 국제적으로도 엄청난 파장을 초래할 수 있다.
본 연구의 목적은 동남아시아 지역에서 주요인사의 신변 위협에 대한 본질적인 원인을 규명하고, 신변 안전을 위한 국제 협조와 그 대응에 있어서 향상된 방안을 제시하는 데 있다.
연구 방법으로는 첫째, 문헌 연구로서 국제테러리즘을 중심으로 각종 문헌, 자료, 각 국가의 기록물, 백서, 간행물 등을 통하여 내용 분석(Contents analysis)을 하였다. 둘째, 사례분석 연구로 동남아시아 4개의 국가별 분석과 태국에서 2009년 4월과 10월에 실시한 ASEAN+3 정상회의에 대하여 SWOT(Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat) 분석 방법을 활용하여 연구하였다.
본 연구의 의의는 동남아시아 지역에서의 국제테러리즘으로부터 주요인사 신변 안전의 궁극적인 해결 방안은 이 지역의 민주화라는 정치체제의 발전과 인간의 존엄성 보장을 위한 평화 사상의 실천이라는 것을 확인했다는 것이다. 또한 국제테러리즘으로부터 주요인사의 신변 안전은 각 국가와 국제질서 안정에 절대적인 과제이며, 이러한 연구 결과를 통하여 동남아시아 지역은 물론 전 세계적으로 주요인사에 대한 신변 안전의 향상, 안정적인 국제질서의 수립과 평화에 기여할 것으로 사료된다.

번역하기

세계화 시대에 각 국가의 이익을 위한 주요인사의 빈번한 교류와 활동은 필연적 현상으로 이들은 세계 여러 지역, 특히 동남아시아의 다양한 국제행사에 적극적으로 참여하고 있다. 그러나 ...

목차 (Table of Contents)