RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      DESIGN EVALUATION OF NO SPIN DIFFERENTIAL MODELS USING THE AXIOMATIC APPROACH

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76028896

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Two No Spin Differential (NSD) models were benchmarked for a project of Dual-Use Technology. The Axiomatic approach is utilized to evaluate the designs of the models. The Independence Axiom is satisfied at the top level of design but not at the second level, which implies the design exhibits coupling and will admit design improvements. The detailed process of design evaluation is described. It is shown that it is possible to develop a unique and evolutionary NSD design by solving the problems that cause coupling within two models.
      번역하기

      Two No Spin Differential (NSD) models were benchmarked for a project of Dual-Use Technology. The Axiomatic approach is utilized to evaluate the designs of the models. The Independence Axiom is satisfied at the top level of design but not at the second...

      Two No Spin Differential (NSD) models were benchmarked for a project of Dual-Use Technology. The Axiomatic approach is utilized to evaluate the designs of the models. The Independence Axiom is satisfied at the top level of design but not at the second level, which implies the design exhibits coupling and will admit design improvements. The detailed process of design evaluation is described. It is shown that it is possible to develop a unique and evolutionary NSD design by solving the problems that cause coupling within two models.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. INTRODUCTION
      • 2. AXIOMATIC DESIGN
      • 3. TOP LEVEL DESIGN EVALUTION FOR TWO NSD MODELS
      • 4. THE SECOND LEVEL DESIGN EVALUATION FOR TWO NSD MODELS
      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. INTRODUCTION
      • 2. AXIOMATIC DESIGN
      • 3. TOP LEVEL DESIGN EVALUTION FOR TWO NSD MODELS
      • 4. THE SECOND LEVEL DESIGN EVALUATION FOR TWO NSD MODELS
      • 5. EVALUATION FOR THE EXISTING NSD MODELS AND CONCLUSION
      • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Weight reduction in automobile design through axiomatic approach" 7 (7): 106-109, 1999c

      2 "The development of tool for evaluating quantitativeindependency between FRS in axiomatic design" 18 (18): 122-130, 2001

      3 "The axiomaticapproach in universal design theory" 1-8, 2000

      4 "The Principles of Design" Oxford University Press,New York 64-72, 1999

      5 "New vibration isolator made axiomatic approach" 1-8, 2000

      6 "NSD Annual Project Report" Dual Use Technology Center 383-388, 2002

      7 "Evolution methodology development of disasembly through axiomatic design" 18 (18): 194-202, 2001

      8 "Design and operation of large systems." 14 (14): 203-213, 1995

      9 "Concep-tual design of lean production systems through anaxiomatic approach" 1-12, 2002

      10 "Com-puting the information content of decoupled designs" 151-160, 2000

      1 "Weight reduction in automobile design through axiomatic approach" 7 (7): 106-109, 1999c

      2 "The development of tool for evaluating quantitativeindependency between FRS in axiomatic design" 18 (18): 122-130, 2001

      3 "The axiomaticapproach in universal design theory" 1-8, 2000

      4 "The Principles of Design" Oxford University Press,New York 64-72, 1999

      5 "New vibration isolator made axiomatic approach" 1-8, 2000

      6 "NSD Annual Project Report" Dual Use Technology Center 383-388, 2002

      7 "Evolution methodology development of disasembly through axiomatic design" 18 (18): 194-202, 2001

      8 "Design and operation of large systems." 14 (14): 203-213, 1995

      9 "Concep-tual design of lean production systems through anaxiomatic approach" 1-12, 2002

      10 "Com-puting the information content of decoupled designs" 151-160, 2000

      11 "Axiomatic approach for design apraisement and development DVD (I)" 16 (16): 124-131, 1999a

      12 "Axiomatic approach for design appraisement and development DVD (II)" 16 (16): 82-88, 1999b

      13 "Axiomatic approach application during the product conceptual design phase" 267-272, 2001

      14 "Axiomatic Design" Oxford University Press, New York 239-297, 2001

      15 "Application of Design Axioms to the Design of Manufacturability for Television Glass Bulb." Hanyang University, Korea 1997

      16 "A study on the development of no spin diferential for an off-road vehicle" 11 (11): 127-133, 2003

      17 ". Improving an existing design based on axiomatic design principles. 1st Conf.Axiomatic Design" 199-202.

      18 ". Enhancingrobust design with the aid of TRIZ and axiomaticdesign. 1st Conf. Axiomatic Design" 1-9,

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-06-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국자동차공학회 영문논문집 -> International Journal of Automotive Technology
      외국어명 : International Journal of Automotive Tech -> International Journal of Automotive Technology
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 SCIE 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.14 0.53 0.85
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.71 0.62 0.534 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼