RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영국의 시장조사제도에 관한 연구 - 공정거래법과 전기통신사업법에 대한 시사점을 포함하여 - = A Study on the UK’s Market Investigation Regime - Including Its Implications on the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act and the Telecommunications Business Act of Korea -

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The European Commission (EC) recently announced its roadmap on ‘New Competition Tool (NCT)’ aimed at fulfilling the goal of providing effective measures to address structural competition problems in digital markets. As the new tool is proposed to ...

      The European Commission (EC) recently announced its roadmap on ‘New Competition Tool (NCT)’ aimed at fulfilling the goal of providing effective measures to address structural competition problems in digital markets. As the new tool is proposed to tackle structural issues of markets by allowing timely and effective intervention against markets, increased attention is given to the UK’s market investigation (MI) authority which has features seemingly fitting the goal of the EC’s proposal of NCT. The MI is a unique tool in the UK’s markets regime as it leads to direct remedies for the subject market(s) without finding any individual violation of the competition law. If the EC adopts and applies a new tool akin to the MI, a significant change will be made to the competition rule of European Union and its impact is not expected to remain within the Union. Thus it would be proper and timely to review the features of the UK’s MI regime and its implication on the design of NCT and our market study system.
      This paper explores the procedural features of the UK’s MI regime and discusses its benefits and potential risks. Also addressed will be the prospect of its role in the design of NCT as well as several considerations to be given in regard to referencing MI’s systemic features and the relevant experience of the UK’s competition authority in its design. While the UK’s MI regime has specific benefits of filling the gap of existing competition tools by functioning as a direct measure to discover and solve root causes of the competition problems in the subject market(s), which cannot be effectively addressed by conventional regulatory or enforcive activities, there are risks of preempting other competition tools resulting in inefficient allocation of investigatory resources of the competition authority. But more important is that a tool designed for directly remedying anti-competitive effects in markets would allow for frequent or unnecessary intervention into the functioning of markets, and consequently bring about market distortion. Although its inherent benefits entitle MI due credits and provide considerable implications for improvement of our market study system, careful approaches are required when considering adoption of an MI-like system. In such review, it is advisable to consider differences between the UK’s legal system and ours, maintaining a balanced view on the benefits and risks of MI.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장주봉, "환경변화에 따른 부가통신사업자 사후규제 개편방안연구" 방송통신위원회 2018

      2 김현경, "플랫폼 사업자 규제법안에 대한 비판적 검토" 법조협회 67 (67): 149-209, 2018

      3 신종철, "통신시장 경쟁상황 평가제도 소개" (봄) : 2008

      4 이강오, "주요 선진국의 시장분석연구 및 시사점" 한국규제학회 19 (19): 39-68, 2010

      5 최난설헌, "제약산업에서의 경쟁법에 의한 지적재산권 남용행위 규제 - EU 사례분석-" 한국경쟁법학회 27 : 96-126, 2013

      6 공정거래위원회, "저렴한 복제약 출시를 차단한 담합행위 국내 첫 제재"

      7 홍순강, "일본의 디지털 플랫폼 사업자 규제 지침 및 법률에 관하여" (204) : 2020

      8 이상윤, "유럽연합의 플랫폼 규제 동향 - “Digital Services Act”와 “New Competition Tool” -" 법학연구소 44 (44): 301-333, 2020

      9 황태희, "영국의 EU탈퇴(Brexit)에 따른 EU 및 영국 경쟁법 비교 연구" 한국비교사법학회 26 (26): 453-474, 2019

      10 과학기술정통부, "부가통신사업, 경쟁상황평가에 포함 사실 아니다" 2018

      1 장주봉, "환경변화에 따른 부가통신사업자 사후규제 개편방안연구" 방송통신위원회 2018

      2 김현경, "플랫폼 사업자 규제법안에 대한 비판적 검토" 법조협회 67 (67): 149-209, 2018

      3 신종철, "통신시장 경쟁상황 평가제도 소개" (봄) : 2008

      4 이강오, "주요 선진국의 시장분석연구 및 시사점" 한국규제학회 19 (19): 39-68, 2010

      5 최난설헌, "제약산업에서의 경쟁법에 의한 지적재산권 남용행위 규제 - EU 사례분석-" 한국경쟁법학회 27 : 96-126, 2013

      6 공정거래위원회, "저렴한 복제약 출시를 차단한 담합행위 국내 첫 제재"

      7 홍순강, "일본의 디지털 플랫폼 사업자 규제 지침 및 법률에 관하여" (204) : 2020

      8 이상윤, "유럽연합의 플랫폼 규제 동향 - “Digital Services Act”와 “New Competition Tool” -" 법학연구소 44 (44): 301-333, 2020

      9 황태희, "영국의 EU탈퇴(Brexit)에 따른 EU 및 영국 경쟁법 비교 연구" 한국비교사법학회 26 (26): 453-474, 2019

      10 과학기술정통부, "부가통신사업, 경쟁상황평가에 포함 사실 아니다" 2018

      11 이황, "디자인 변경에 대한 경쟁법 규제와 구글쇼핑 사건" 법무부 (90) : 65-106, 2020

      12 임원혁, "독과점 시장구조 개선과 경쟁촉진 과제 관련 영국 경쟁위원회(CC) 및 공정거래실(OFT) 면담(한국개발연구원 해외출장보고)"

      13 공정거래위원회, "공정위, 「온라인플랫폼 공정화법」제정안 입법예고 —디지털 생태계에서의 공정거래 및 상생협력 기반 마련 본격화"

      14 홍대식, "공정거래위원회의 경쟁주창" 한국상사법학회 31 (31): 291-325, 2013

      15 성승제, "공정거래위원회 시장분석의 실효성 확보방안 연구" 공정거래위원회 2012

      16 공정거래위원회, "공정거래위원회 30년사"

      17 홍대식, "개정 전기통신사업법의 부가통신사업 실태조사 근거 규정에 대한 검토" (34) : 2019

      18 Ralston, Helen, "What problems can the European Commission’s New Competition Tool fix?"

      19 OECD, "What is Competition on the Merits?" OECD 2006

      20 Connor, Charley, "Vestager: EU may introduce competition rules for “digital gatekeepers”, Global Competition Review"

      21 Beioley, Kate, "Top UK competition official threatens action against Google and Facebook" Financial Times

      22 Robertson, Lynn, "The role of market studies as a tool to promote competition" Global Forum on Competition

      23 Lamadrid, Alfonso, "The proposed New Competition Tool: A follow-up" Chillin’Competition

      24 Stanley, Martin, "The UK Competition Regime(Understanding Regulation)"

      25 Komninos, Assimakis, "The European Commission eyes the addition of a market investigation tool to its 60-year-old toolbox —but is it a chisel or a sledgehammer?"

      26 Broadbent, Meredith, "The Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, and the New Competition Tool —European Initiatives to Hobble U.S. Tech Companies" Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIG)

      27 Competition and Markets Authority, "The CMA’s response to European Commission’s consultation in relation to the Digital Services Act package and New Competition Tool"

      28 European Commission, "Speech by Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager: Building trust in technology"

      29 Basso, Adriano, "Recent developments at the CMA: 2017-2018" 53 (53): 2018

      30 Burrows, Euan, "Quickguides: The use of market studies and market investigations in UK competition law" Ashurst Quickguides

      31 Duncan, Felipe F., "Platforms at the gate? Initial reactions to the Commission’s digital consultations"

      32 Competition and Markets Authority, "Online platforms and digital advertising market study —Final report" 2020

      33 Competition Commission, "Movies on pay TV market investigation —Final report" 2012

      34 OECD, "Methodologies for market studies —background paper by the Secretariat(‘DAF/COMP/WP3(2017)1’)"

      35 Office of Fair Trading, "Market studies: Guidance on the OFT approach (‘OFT519’)"

      36 Oxera, "Market investigations: a commentary on the first five years"

      37 Office of Fair Trading, "Market investigation references: Guidance about the making of market references under Part 4 of the Enterprise Act (‘OFT511’)"

      38 Competition and Markets Authority, "Market Studies and Market Investigations: Supplemental guidance on the CMA’s approach” (‘CMA3’)"

      39 Coscelli, Andrea, "Making Market Work Well: The U.K. Market Investigation Regime" 10 (10): 2014

      40 Feteira, "Lúio Tomé The Interplay between European and National Competition Law after Regulation 1/2003 —‘United (Should) We Stand?’" Wolters Kluwer 2015

      41 Geroski, Paul, "International Antitrust Law and Policy:Fordham Corporate Law 2004" Juris Publishing 2005

      42 European Commission, "Inception Impact Assessment: Ares(2020)2877634"

      43 Cserhalmi, Zsuzsa, "Impact assessment for a New Competition Tool" ICR Law Center Webinar on EU Policy Direction for the Platform Industry

      44 Competition Commission, "Guidelines for market investigations: Their role, procedures, assessment and remedies (‘CC3’)"

      45 권남훈, "GSK와 동아제약㈜의 역지불 합의에 대한 경제분석" 공정거래위원회 2011

      46 Rab, Suzanne, "From ordered competition –towards a new competition order? The role of the UK Competition Commission at the interface between sector regulation and competition law" 6 (6): 2009

      47 Geroski, Paul, "Essays in Competition Policy" 2006

      48 Jermsten, Rikard, "Digital platforms and the potential changes to competition law at the European level –The view of the Nordic competition authorities"

      49 Streel, Alexandre, "Digital Markets Act: Making Economic Regulation of Platforms Fit for the Digital Age" CERRE 2020

      50 Competition and Markets Authority, "David Currie on the role of competition in stimulating innovation"

      51 Thomson Reuters, "Competition regime: Market investigations under the Enterprise Act 2002"

      52 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, "Competition law review:post implementation review of statutory changes in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013"

      53 Whish, Richard, "Competition Law" Oxford University Press 2018

      54 Dunne, Niamh, "Between competition law and regulation : hybridized approaches to market control" 2 (2): 2014

      55 Competition Commission, "BAA airports market investigation —Final report" 2009

      56 공정거래위원회, "2012 공정거래백서" 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.86 0.86 0.93
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.86 0.981 0.86
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼