1 "Use of relay feedback test for automatic tuning of multivariable systems" 40 : 627-646, 1994.
2 "Use of relay feedback for system identification" 42 (42): 1174-1180, 1996.
3 "System identification method for hammerstein processes" 41 (41): 4295-4302, 2001.Aug
4 "Structure identification of nonlinear dynamic systems ? a survey on input/output approaches" 26 : 651-677, 1990.
5 "Structure identification for nonlinear models" 748-753, 2000.
6 "Sequential loop closing identification of multivariable processes using the biased relay feedback method" 191 (191): 611-624, 2004.May
7 "Sequential loop closing identification of multivariable process models" 24 (24): 809-814, July,2000.
8 "Relay feedback approaches for the identification of hammerstein-type nonlinear processes" 43 (43): 735-740, 2004.Feb
9 "Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specificatoins on phase and amplitude margins" 20 : 645-651, 1984.
10 "Application of a general multi-model approach for identification of highly nonlinear processes ? a case study Int. J. Control" 57 (57): 1993.
1 "Use of relay feedback test for automatic tuning of multivariable systems" 40 : 627-646, 1994.
2 "Use of relay feedback for system identification" 42 (42): 1174-1180, 1996.
3 "System identification method for hammerstein processes" 41 (41): 4295-4302, 2001.Aug
4 "Structure identification of nonlinear dynamic systems ? a survey on input/output approaches" 26 : 651-677, 1990.
5 "Structure identification for nonlinear models" 748-753, 2000.
6 "Sequential loop closing identification of multivariable processes using the biased relay feedback method" 191 (191): 611-624, 2004.May
7 "Sequential loop closing identification of multivariable process models" 24 (24): 809-814, July,2000.
8 "Relay feedback approaches for the identification of hammerstein-type nonlinear processes" 43 (43): 735-740, 2004.Feb
9 "Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specificatoins on phase and amplitude margins" 20 : 645-651, 1984.
10 "Application of a general multi-model approach for identification of highly nonlinear processes ? a case study Int. J. Control" 57 (57): 1993.