統一新羅時代의 孔烟의 構造에 대한 再論 = Response to the criticism of my previous dissertation on the structure of the Kongyon(孔烟) in Unified Silla era

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I have ever expressed my own opinion of the structure of Kongyon(孔烟) as shown in the Silla Village Register(新羅村落帳籍) a few years ago. It can be categorized largely into three respects. First. the Kongyon had so differing and diverse structures. Namely, it was comprised of not only one family, but there were cases it was either comprised of one family plus slaves, or one main family(主家族) plus subordinate families(從屬家族), or even the case of main family plus personal component members(個別的 編入人) . Second, in the sense that members of the Kongyon were in the general carrying out their dwellings and lives all together, it was perceived as groups identical to the households(家口) of today. Third, the combination of the Kongyon components was not artificially forced out by governmental authorities, but instead, naturally-formed households were transformed into such Kongyon format.
To my opinion like that, Messrs. Lee, Inn-chol(李仁哲) and Yoon, Sun-tae(尹善泰) recently raised a few questions and criticized. However, as a result of a close scrutiny of it, lots of problems were found in their such criticism, itself. Simply put, their criticism is least likely successful. In this regard, my opinion is still valid, at least I believe so.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 孔烟의 構造에 대한 再論의 辯
• Ⅱ. 孔烟과 烟과 孔의 關係에 대한 筆者의 立場
• Ⅲ. 筆者의 見解에 대한 孔烟編戶說의 批判과 그 問題點
• Ⅳ. 맺음말-孔烟編戶說의 前提에 대한 또 다른 疑問-