RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      응급환자 의료정보 활용에 대한 법적 고찰 및 개선방안 연구 - 사후거부권 도입(opt out)과 진료정보시스템 정비를 중심으로 - = Legal consideration and improvement research on the use of medical information for emergency patients - Focusing on the introduction of the right to object(Opt-out) and the maintenance of the medical information system -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109148212

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Medical information is personal and sensitive information. Medical information is important data for providing appropriate emergency medical services to emergency patients. The state has an obligation to protect the lives of emergency patients by increasing their chances of survival. Therefore, personal medical information must be actively utilized in emergency situations. However, medical information is subject to the right to self-determination of personal information. Therefore, in order to use medical information, the consent of the information subject or legal basis is required. It is no different in emergency situations. However, under the current Personal Information Protection Act or the Emergency Medical Services Act, it is not clear whether medical information of emergency patients can be used without consent. Therefore, it is necessary to specify in law the right to preferentially use medical information of emergency patients in emergency situations without prior consent of the information subject and to refuse it after the fact.
      Even if medical information can be used without consent based on the Right to object(Opt-out), medical information must actually be able to be used in emergency medical settings. Therefore, first, medical information must be differentiated for each individual and allow confirmation of specific medical service contents. Second, medical information must include overall medical information from the past to the present. Third, the medical information of information subjects dispersed across multiple medical institutions must be linked and provided organically. From this perspective, NEDIS, National Emergency Data Information System established based on the Act on Emergency Medical Services must be established as a system in which medical information of information subjects is provided in continuity and connectivity and is accessible to medical personnel at emergency medical institutions. Additionally, structurally, medical information systems must be able to be interconnected regardless of the size of the medical institution. In terms of content, any medical professional should be able to understand and interpret terms such as diagnosis, treatment, surgery, and examination provided in medical information. Therefore, standardization of systems and terminology is an important prerequisite for utilizing medical information of emergency patients.
      The state must actively provide medical services in emergency situations. To this end, the country must create specific conditions so that medical information can be managed safely and actively utilized. Therefore, there is a need to improve the legal system and environment for utilizing emergency medical information.
      번역하기

      Medical information is personal and sensitive information. Medical information is important data for providing appropriate emergency medical services to emergency patients. The state has an obligation to protect the lives of emergency patients by incr...

      Medical information is personal and sensitive information. Medical information is important data for providing appropriate emergency medical services to emergency patients. The state has an obligation to protect the lives of emergency patients by increasing their chances of survival. Therefore, personal medical information must be actively utilized in emergency situations. However, medical information is subject to the right to self-determination of personal information. Therefore, in order to use medical information, the consent of the information subject or legal basis is required. It is no different in emergency situations. However, under the current Personal Information Protection Act or the Emergency Medical Services Act, it is not clear whether medical information of emergency patients can be used without consent. Therefore, it is necessary to specify in law the right to preferentially use medical information of emergency patients in emergency situations without prior consent of the information subject and to refuse it after the fact.
      Even if medical information can be used without consent based on the Right to object(Opt-out), medical information must actually be able to be used in emergency medical settings. Therefore, first, medical information must be differentiated for each individual and allow confirmation of specific medical service contents. Second, medical information must include overall medical information from the past to the present. Third, the medical information of information subjects dispersed across multiple medical institutions must be linked and provided organically. From this perspective, NEDIS, National Emergency Data Information System established based on the Act on Emergency Medical Services must be established as a system in which medical information of information subjects is provided in continuity and connectivity and is accessible to medical personnel at emergency medical institutions. Additionally, structurally, medical information systems must be able to be interconnected regardless of the size of the medical institution. In terms of content, any medical professional should be able to understand and interpret terms such as diagnosis, treatment, surgery, and examination provided in medical information. Therefore, standardization of systems and terminology is an important prerequisite for utilizing medical information of emergency patients.
      The state must actively provide medical services in emergency situations. To this end, the country must create specific conditions so that medical information can be managed safely and actively utilized. Therefore, there is a need to improve the legal system and environment for utilizing emergency medical information.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이백휴, "환자의 의무기록 관련 의료인의 법적 지위" 대한의료법학회 11 (11): 2011

      2 이봉문, "환자의 의료정보의 법적 보호에 관한 고찰" 인하대학교 법학연구소 26 (26): 2023

      3 전광석, "한국헌법론" 집현재 2014

      4 보건복지부, "평생을 함께할 의료정보 플랫폼, ‘건강정보 고속도로’ 본격 가동"

      5 양소연, "진료기록은 환자의 개인정보인가, 의사의 저작물인가?" 한국정보법학회 27 (27): 2023

      6 이경환, "진료기록은 의사의 소유?"

      7 김일환, "지능정보사회에서 헌법의 역할과 기능" 성균관대학교법학연구원 32 (32): 2020

      8 강현구, "정보주체의 동의 없는 개인정보 활용의 위법성 판단 방법-기본권 충돌의 관점에서-" 한국헌법학회 28 (28): 2022

      9 이백휴, "의무기록 열람 및 사본교부에 관한 법적 문제" 한양대학교 법학연구소 28 (28): 2011

      10 정규원, "의료정보에 대한 의료인의 권리와 의무" 한양대학교법학연구소 28 (28): 2011

      1 이백휴, "환자의 의무기록 관련 의료인의 법적 지위" 대한의료법학회 11 (11): 2011

      2 이봉문, "환자의 의료정보의 법적 보호에 관한 고찰" 인하대학교 법학연구소 26 (26): 2023

      3 전광석, "한국헌법론" 집현재 2014

      4 보건복지부, "평생을 함께할 의료정보 플랫폼, ‘건강정보 고속도로’ 본격 가동"

      5 양소연, "진료기록은 환자의 개인정보인가, 의사의 저작물인가?" 한국정보법학회 27 (27): 2023

      6 이경환, "진료기록은 의사의 소유?"

      7 김일환, "지능정보사회에서 헌법의 역할과 기능" 성균관대학교법학연구원 32 (32): 2020

      8 강현구, "정보주체의 동의 없는 개인정보 활용의 위법성 판단 방법-기본권 충돌의 관점에서-" 한국헌법학회 28 (28): 2022

      9 이백휴, "의무기록 열람 및 사본교부에 관한 법적 문제" 한양대학교 법학연구소 28 (28): 2011

      10 정규원, "의료정보에 대한 의료인의 권리와 의무" 한양대학교법학연구소 28 (28): 2011

      11 김수민 ; 박정선, "의료법상 진료정보교류를 위한 법제도적 고찰" 한국콘텐츠학회 17 (17): 2017

      12 강희동 ; 임경수 ; 김원영 ; 오범진 ; 김원, "응급진료에 전자의무기록의 적용시 응급의료진의 적응도" 대한응급의학회 15 (15): 2004

      13 배현아, "응급의료체계 내에서 진료정보교류의 법제" 한국의료법학회 24 (24): 2016

      14 김상철, "응급의료분야의 정보 및 통신기술 도입 : 충청북도 스마트응급의료사업" 한의사협회 66 (66): 2023

      15 김송옥, "유럽연합 GDPR의 동의제도 분석 및 우리 개인정보보호법제에 주는 시사점" 아주대학교법학연구소 13 (13): 2019

      16 정명진, "보건의료빅데이터 연계 활용 기반구축 연구" 한국보건산업진흥원 2018

      17 최경진, "데이터와 사법상의 권리, 그리고 데이터 소유권(Data Ownership)" 한국정보법학회 23 (23): 2019

      18 이동진, "데이터 소유권(Data Ownership), 개념과 그 실익" 한국정보법학회 22 (22): 2018

      19 정규원, "건강정보의 이차적 이용" 한양대학교법학연구소 27 (27): 2010

      20 남형두, "건강정보 빅데이터와 프라이버시 침해 문제" 한국정보법학회 23 (23): 2019

      21 이규식, "건강보험 40년 성과와 과제" 한국보건행정학회 27 (27): 2017

      22 김해원, "개인정보에 대한 헌법적 검토" 한국비교공법학회 20 (20): 2019

      23 윤종수, "개인정보보호법제의 개관" 한국정보법학회 13 (13): 2009

      24 정준현, "개인정보보호법 제정 필요성 및 방향" 성균관대학교 법학연구원 22 (22): 2010

      25 전승재 ; 권헌영, "개인정보 수집, 이용, 제3자 제공에 관한 4개국 법제 비교분석" 법무부 2019

      26 아주경제, "‘실손청구전산화’ 중계기관, 결국 보험개발원으로…의료계반발 없을까"

      27 한국보건의료정보원, "2020 보건의료정보화 실태조사" 2020

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼