RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      S-138 Comparison of tenofovir rescue therapy between single and multi-drug resistant chronic hepatitis B = S-138 Comparison of tenofovir rescue therapy between single and multi-drug resistant chronic hepatitis B

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102130259

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background:?Tenofovir (TDF) therapy has been recommended as a rescue strategy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with nucleos(t)ide (NA) resistance. Unfortunately, after sequential NA monotherapy in CHB patients with lamivudine (LAM) resistance, m...

      Background:?Tenofovir (TDF) therapy has been recommended as a rescue strategy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with nucleos(t)ide (NA) resistance. Unfortunately, after sequential NA monotherapy in CHB patients with lamivudine (LAM) resistance, multidrug resistance (MDR) developed in a substantial number of patients. Very limited data are available on the comparison of TDF therapy between single drug resistant (SDR) and MDR groups in NA-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients.?Methods:?Of the 269 CHB patients with NA-resistance, 139 were SDR group and 130 were MDR group. A matched study population was constructed to compare the antiviral efficacy of TDF therapy by a propensity score analysis. The primary endpoint was a virological response (VR), defined as an HBV DNA level of <12 IU/mL.?Results:?Two hundreds CHB patients were selected after matching propensity score with 1:1 ratio. The median follow-up period during TDF therapy was 31.0 months (range, 6-44 months). VR occurred in 176 patients (92 patients in the SDR group and 84 patients in the MDR group) during the treatment period. The VR rates were not different between the SDR and MDR groups (84.5% vs. 75.4% at month 12, and 91.6% vs. 85.2% at month 24; log rank p=0.085). PVR rates also were not differ between both groups (29.0% and 36.0% in the SDR and MDR groups, respectively; p=0.291). ALT normalization rates did not differ between both groups. During TDF therapy, 7.8% (6 of 77) of patients in the SDR group, and 12.3% (10 of 81) of patients in the MDR group achieved HBeAg seroconversion, respectively (p=0.343). In multivariate analysis, absolute HBV DNA level at the start of TDF rescue treatment (p<0.001; OR, 0.708; 95% CI, 0.637-0.788) was only significantly associated with VR.?Conclusions:?TDF rescue therapy has comparable efficacy in the SDR and MDR CHB patients, and the presence of MDR did not alter the response rates. HBV DNA level at the start of TDF rescue therapy was the only predictor of subsequent virologic response. Therefore, starting rescue therapies at the low level viremia is more effective than delayed implementation.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼