RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      청각 손상에 대한 평가: 현황과 배상의학적 고찰 = Hearing Injury Evaluation: Current Status and Medicolegal Considerations

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101610679

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background and Objectives In disability rating of hearing injury, there are some medicolegal considerations, such as discrepancy in estimating values between McBride system and the American Medical Association system, and difficulties in judging the hearing level in boundary cases. We have therefore felt the need of complementary hearing disability evaluation methods that reflect reality. As a first step, we have pointed out current situation and problems in legal advisory cases of hearing injury.
      Subjects and Method For the past 14 years, we have provided legal advisory on hearing injury for 121 cases for courts (group A) or insurance companies (group B). Eleven cases of ‘aggravation of disabilityʼ were excluded. Data were summarized and tested statistically. We have used unpaired t-test for continuous variables such as age, hearing, hearing disability, disability rating, Fisher’s exact test for dichotomous variable such as gender, group (A/B), and Pearsonʼs correlation test for correlation coefficients between continuous variables.
      Results Subjects were more frequently males (3:1) and in the fifth decade of life. The averages of audiometry were around 40 dB. There were significant differences in hearing and disability rating between younger and older group. Group B is significantly older than group A. The type of disability or accident did not influence hearing and disability rating.
      Conclusion This paper could help figure out the current situation with respect to medicolegal considerations of hearing injury discrepancies in disability rating and could also serve well to recognize the necessity for a complementary hearing disability evaluation method, especially for borderline hearing level. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2014;57(7):448-53
      번역하기

      Background and Objectives In disability rating of hearing injury, there are some medicolegal considerations, such as discrepancy in estimating values between McBride system and the American Medical Association system, and difficulties in judging the h...

      Background and Objectives In disability rating of hearing injury, there are some medicolegal considerations, such as discrepancy in estimating values between McBride system and the American Medical Association system, and difficulties in judging the hearing level in boundary cases. We have therefore felt the need of complementary hearing disability evaluation methods that reflect reality. As a first step, we have pointed out current situation and problems in legal advisory cases of hearing injury.
      Subjects and Method For the past 14 years, we have provided legal advisory on hearing injury for 121 cases for courts (group A) or insurance companies (group B). Eleven cases of ‘aggravation of disabilityʼ were excluded. Data were summarized and tested statistically. We have used unpaired t-test for continuous variables such as age, hearing, hearing disability, disability rating, Fisher’s exact test for dichotomous variable such as gender, group (A/B), and Pearsonʼs correlation test for correlation coefficients between continuous variables.
      Results Subjects were more frequently males (3:1) and in the fifth decade of life. The averages of audiometry were around 40 dB. There were significant differences in hearing and disability rating between younger and older group. Group B is significantly older than group A. The type of disability or accident did not influence hearing and disability rating.
      Conclusion This paper could help figure out the current situation with respect to medicolegal considerations of hearing injury discrepancies in disability rating and could also serve well to recognize the necessity for a complementary hearing disability evaluation method, especially for borderline hearing level. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2014;57(7):448-53

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 R Core Team, "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" RFoundationforStatisticalComputing

      2 "Guide for the evaluation of hearing handicap" 241 (241): 2055-2059, 1979

      3 Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "Disability evaluation guidebook" Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Press 1998

      4 Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "Disability evaluation guidebook" Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Press 2007

      5 McBride ED, "Disability Evaluation and Principles of Treatment of Compensable Injuries" Philadelphia: Lippincott 1963

      6 이경석, "Development of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Rating Physical Impairment" 대한의학회 24 : 221-226, 2009

      7 장성호, "Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline-Rating the Impairment in Pain" 대한의학회 24 : 330-337, 2009

      8 박정호, "Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Rating Physical Disability of Upper Extremity" 대한의학회 24 : 288-298, 2009

      9 김희천, "Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline Rating the Physical Impairment: Lower Extremities" 대한의학회 24 : 299-306, 2009

      10 박철원, "Development of Guideline for Rating the Physical Impairment of Otolaryngologic Field" 대한의학회 24 (24): 258-266, 2009

      1 R Core Team, "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" RFoundationforStatisticalComputing

      2 "Guide for the evaluation of hearing handicap" 241 (241): 2055-2059, 1979

      3 Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "Disability evaluation guidebook" Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Press 1998

      4 Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "Disability evaluation guidebook" Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Press 2007

      5 McBride ED, "Disability Evaluation and Principles of Treatment of Compensable Injuries" Philadelphia: Lippincott 1963

      6 이경석, "Development of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Rating Physical Impairment" 대한의학회 24 : 221-226, 2009

      7 장성호, "Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline-Rating the Impairment in Pain" 대한의학회 24 : 330-337, 2009

      8 박정호, "Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Rating Physical Disability of Upper Extremity" 대한의학회 24 : 288-298, 2009

      9 김희천, "Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline Rating the Physical Impairment: Lower Extremities" 대한의학회 24 : 299-306, 2009

      10 박철원, "Development of Guideline for Rating the Physical Impairment of Otolaryngologic Field" 대한의학회 24 (24): 258-266, 2009

      11 염유식, "Consensus Making Process in the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Physical Impairment: Evaluation as a Social Process" 대한의학회 24 : 242-246, 2009

      12 원종욱, "A New Disability Rating Method according to the Job Using the Korean Academy of Medical Science Disability Guideline" 대한의학회 27 (27): 1453-1459, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼