RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      포장사과 구입실태 및 선호 분석 = Consumers' purchasing behavior and preference for small packaged apple

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105056159

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper analyzes the consumers' preference for packaged apple and derives the measures to vitalize the distribution of packaged apple. To do this, survey was conducted for consumers in large cities, Seoul, Busan, and Daegu to observe their purchasing behavior and satisfaction both for packaged and unpackaged apple. Survey was focused to how they are satisfied with several attributes of package such as size, appearance, content, material, and label. On the basis of the survey results, the values of the package attributes were estimated. Survey results show that consumers tend to buy unpackaged apple rather than packaged apple. About 34 percent out of 313 respondents have ever purchased apple packed with paper box while only 10.5 percent have an experience to buy packaged apple with transparent box. Most respondents answered they preferred the package of five to six apples and 1.3 kilograms most. They preferred mid or large size apple. Estimation of the values of the package attributes using the conjoint analysis shows that consumers are giving the highest value to the price of packing material. It means that consumers are reluctant to the extra payment resulted from packing the apple. Therefore, the efforts to reduce the cost of packing apple should be made steadily. In order to vitalize the distribution of small packaged apple, the package should contain high quality apple with high sugar content, proper size, good appearance, and so on. And it needs to be promoted to the consumers that small packaged apple are not inferior to apple packed with paper box.
      번역하기

      This paper analyzes the consumers' preference for packaged apple and derives the measures to vitalize the distribution of packaged apple. To do this, survey was conducted for consumers in large cities, Seoul, Busan, and Daegu to observe their purchasi...

      This paper analyzes the consumers' preference for packaged apple and derives the measures to vitalize the distribution of packaged apple. To do this, survey was conducted for consumers in large cities, Seoul, Busan, and Daegu to observe their purchasing behavior and satisfaction both for packaged and unpackaged apple. Survey was focused to how they are satisfied with several attributes of package such as size, appearance, content, material, and label. On the basis of the survey results, the values of the package attributes were estimated. Survey results show that consumers tend to buy unpackaged apple rather than packaged apple. About 34 percent out of 313 respondents have ever purchased apple packed with paper box while only 10.5 percent have an experience to buy packaged apple with transparent box. Most respondents answered they preferred the package of five to six apples and 1.3 kilograms most. They preferred mid or large size apple. Estimation of the values of the package attributes using the conjoint analysis shows that consumers are giving the highest value to the price of packing material. It means that consumers are reluctant to the extra payment resulted from packing the apple. Therefore, the efforts to reduce the cost of packing apple should be made steadily. In order to vitalize the distribution of small packaged apple, the package should contain high quality apple with high sugar content, proper size, good appearance, and so on. And it needs to be promoted to the consumers that small packaged apple are not inferior to apple packed with paper box.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 유기준, "차별화 상품의 유통실태에 관한 조사 연구" 한국식품유통학회 22 (22): 59-98, 2005

      2 김경필, "과일 상품가치의 헤도닉가격 분석" 한국농업경제학회 43 (43): 33-56, 2002

      3 김경필, "과실 포장 상품에 대한 소비자선호와 시사점-사과배감귤을 중심으로-" 한국식품유통학회 24 (24): 101-118, 2007

      4 Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation, "Consumption Pattern of Main Fruits in 2006" 2006

      1 유기준, "차별화 상품의 유통실태에 관한 조사 연구" 한국식품유통학회 22 (22): 59-98, 2005

      2 김경필, "과일 상품가치의 헤도닉가격 분석" 한국농업경제학회 43 (43): 33-56, 2002

      3 김경필, "과실 포장 상품에 대한 소비자선호와 시사점-사과배감귤을 중심으로-" 한국식품유통학회 24 (24): 101-118, 2007

      4 Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation, "Consumption Pattern of Main Fruits in 2006" 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-03-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 농업과학연구 -> Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
      외국어명 : JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE -> Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
      KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-04-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.28 0.28 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼