RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      AN OVERVIEW OF THE CONTENTS AND MODELS OF INTEGRATION IN CHRISTIAN COUNSELING

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A35494964

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      There has been a long history of struggles in establishing Christian counseling among Christian psychologists, counselors, and psychotherapists. Perhaps for the first time in the history of counseling and psychotherapy, science and religion were separ...

      There has been a long history of struggles in establishing Christian counseling among Christian psychologists, counselors, and psychotherapists. Perhaps for the first time in the history of counseling and psychotherapy, science and religion were separated. The role of science was to observe and to describe the given phenomena. The role of religion was to make a value judgment. On the theoretical level, the separation of the two has been possible. But on the practical level, the two cannot be completely separated. Counseling and psychotherapy is the activity in the area of applied science, in which the description and value judgment go hand in hand. Especially, Christian counselors and psychotherapists strongly feel that they have to deal with both areas in their clinical practice. The discipline of Christian counseling comes out of the necessity of blending together the two areas of description and value judgment.
      To deal with the two areas is not easy for Christian counselors and psychotherapists. Since Fritz Kunkel first used the term "integration" in 1953 (Vande Kemp, 1996, p. 77), there has been great confusion about the integration between science and religion until recent years. Scholars use the term integration inconsistently. Some scholars prefer the theoretical approach to integration while other scholars prefer the practical approach. Scholars differ not just on how to integrate the two approaches, but also on what exactly to integrate. It seems that the agreement of what and of how to integrate is almost impossible because of the great variety of integrative works.
      Even though the concern for blending together the two areas is increasing, there is little direction on how to proceed. This article has been written in the context of the confusion of integration and tries to show the whole spectrum of integration between science and religion in the area of counseling and psychotherapy. By presenting the spectrum, the readers will grasp the whole picture of the struggle of integration during the past few decades. A number of articles and books available are used for the analysis and synthesis. Most of the articles for integration have been published in the Journal of Psychology and Theology or the Journal of Psychology and Christianity, which are two leading journals for integration. This article will present the contents and models of integration. Concerning content, many areas will be covered, such as the history of integration, the concept of integration, the goals of counseling, and the different characteristics of Christian counseling. Concerning integration, the various approaches to integration will be presented. The models of the different approaches will be examined and compared. In the conclusion, useful models for analyzing integration will be suggested, with the hope that readers can use the suggested framework to understand better the various forms of integration.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼