RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미국통일상법전(UCC) 묵시적 보증과 배제: CISG 제35조와의 관계에 대한 미국 판례를 중심으로 = Implied Warranty in UCC-focusing on US Case law on Relationship with the CISG Art.35

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109125952

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper examines the implied warranties under the UCC and their exclusions, and shows how they differ from Article 35 of the CISG. The implied warranty of particular purpose under the UCC is similar to Article 35(2) of the CISG. However, the UCC provides a requirement for the seller to disclaim or modify such implied warranties to avoid liability for the seller’s implied warranties. The CISG, on the other hand, does not directly provide for the exclusion or modification of warranties.
      This paper analyzes the case law of U.S. courts regarding the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose in the context of an international sale of goods with a U.S.-based entity.
      The results show that, in some cases, U.S. courts have applied the UCC rules to determine the requirements for implied warranties to the exclusion of the CISG. This is not only contrary to the purpose of the CISG as a unified law, but also shows a misunderstanding of the CISG. Therefore, trade counterparties engaged in international goods transactions should not only actively utilize the CISG as a unified law for international goods sales contracts to increase the predictability of trade transactions, but also carefully identify the matters that cannot be covered by the CISG (such as the requirement to exclude or modify implied warranties) and agree to them in writing when concluding contracts.
      번역하기

      This paper examines the implied warranties under the UCC and their exclusions, and shows how they differ from Article 35 of the CISG. The implied warranty of particular purpose under the UCC is similar to Article 35(2) of the CISG. However, the UCC pr...

      This paper examines the implied warranties under the UCC and their exclusions, and shows how they differ from Article 35 of the CISG. The implied warranty of particular purpose under the UCC is similar to Article 35(2) of the CISG. However, the UCC provides a requirement for the seller to disclaim or modify such implied warranties to avoid liability for the seller’s implied warranties. The CISG, on the other hand, does not directly provide for the exclusion or modification of warranties.
      This paper analyzes the case law of U.S. courts regarding the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose in the context of an international sale of goods with a U.S.-based entity.
      The results show that, in some cases, U.S. courts have applied the UCC rules to determine the requirements for implied warranties to the exclusion of the CISG. This is not only contrary to the purpose of the CISG as a unified law, but also shows a misunderstanding of the CISG. Therefore, trade counterparties engaged in international goods transactions should not only actively utilize the CISG as a unified law for international goods sales contracts to increase the predictability of trade transactions, but also carefully identify the matters that cannot be covered by the CISG (such as the requirement to exclude or modify implied warranties) and agree to them in writing when concluding contracts.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼