RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      탈진실의 시대, 5・18의 진실을 다시 묻기: 5・18조사위 진상규명 활동에 대한 성찰적 비판 = Re-Questioning the Truth of May 18 in the Era of Post-truth: Reflective Criticism of the May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission's Activities

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109261140

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examines the results and limitations of The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission’s truth finding activities, focusing on the ex officio investigation report. The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission ended its activities on December 26, 2023, and announced the results of its truth finding activities over the past four years in 17 ex officio investigation reports. The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission announced that 11 of the 17 investigations were able to reveal the truth, and 6 were unable to reveal the truth. They failed to find out the truth about key issues, including the circumstances and responsibility of the shooting, burials, and the attack on the weapons depot. In particular, some of the ex officio investigation reports deny the truth through euphemisms even for the facts that already identified in the past. The biggest problem with The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission investigation report is that it resonates with the allegations of distortion and slander, not the voice of the truth, causing paradoxes of post-truth phenomenon. It is time for reflective criticism of the May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission's activities and a new search for finding out the truth after the May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission.
      번역하기

      This study examines the results and limitations of The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission’s truth finding activities, focusing on the ex officio investigation report. The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission ended its activ...

      This study examines the results and limitations of The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission’s truth finding activities, focusing on the ex officio investigation report. The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission ended its activities on December 26, 2023, and announced the results of its truth finding activities over the past four years in 17 ex officio investigation reports. The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission announced that 11 of the 17 investigations were able to reveal the truth, and 6 were unable to reveal the truth. They failed to find out the truth about key issues, including the circumstances and responsibility of the shooting, burials, and the attack on the weapons depot. In particular, some of the ex officio investigation reports deny the truth through euphemisms even for the facts that already identified in the past. The biggest problem with The May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission investigation report is that it resonates with the allegations of distortion and slander, not the voice of the truth, causing paradoxes of post-truth phenomenon. It is time for reflective criticism of the May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission's activities and a new search for finding out the truth after the May 18 Democratization Movement Truth Commission.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼