The term ‘light verbs’ such as have/give/take/do/make in ‘have a swim’, ‘give the show a miss’, ‘take a dive’, ‘do a favor’ and ‘make a decision’ was at first coined by Jespersen(1954). Since then there have been two groups of ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103658190
유정숙 (경상대학교)
2016
English
구체화 ; 초점전이 ; 단위화 ; 주제화 ; 화용성 ; Cognitive and Discourse perspective ; Reification ; Focus shift ; Topicalization ; Metaphor
KCI등재
학술저널
193-195(3쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The term ‘light verbs’ such as have/give/take/do/make in ‘have a swim’, ‘give the show a miss’, ‘take a dive’, ‘do a favor’ and ‘make a decision’ was at first coined by Jespersen(1954). Since then there have been two groups of ...
The term ‘light verbs’ such as have/give/take/do/make in ‘have a swim’, ‘give the show a miss’, ‘take a dive’, ‘do a favor’ and ‘make a decision’ was at first coined by Jespersen(1954). Since then there have been two groups of researches competing in respect to English light verb constructions (LVC, in short). One is to propose that the light verbs which head these constructions do not largely contribute to the meaning of the complex predicate (Jackendoff 1974, Cattell 1984, Baker 1988, Grimshaw and Mester 1988, Culicover and Jackendoff 2001, among others).
The other is to suggest that somehow they put their own meanings to the construction with their contents a little bit lightened (Wierzbicka 1982, Dixon 1991, Brugman 2001, among others). This dissertation is in favor of the latter position, focusing on some problems which have been ignored or overlooked by current studies. In order to deal with the issues, I adopt two perspectives, cognitive and discourse perspective.
Especially, three problems will be highlighted throughout this dissertation. The first one is about allowing a variety of forms of deverbal nouns (DVNs, in short) in ‘true light verb’ (TLVs, in short) constructions, which are defined to preserve the fixed form (‘a + V’), unexpectedly taking other determiners or breaking their frozen status structurally. As DVNs of TLVs have been treated as unstable NPs in that they rarely undergo syntactic operations such as wh-movement, passivization, pronominalization, and occurrence with definite articles, as suggested in Kearns (2002), many spoken data observed in corpora such as COCA, BNC, WebCorp. which threaten their frozen structural status, need to be explained.
The second is about the insufficient analysis of DVN’s own productivity for LVCs in that the appearances of new action verbs in LVC that have generally not been accepted as a member of the DVNs have continually been introduced newly to LVCs in English.
Regarding these two issues, I adopt cognitive mechanisms such as Conceptual Metaphor, Unitarization and Reification. With Conceptual metaphor, it is demonstrated that humans consider even their actions as something possessed and produced, proposing the conceptual metaphors for TLVs AN ACTION IS A POSSESSION, for Vague Action Verbs (VAVs, in short) AN ACTION IS A PRODUCT.
In order to explain the conceptualized path for the various structural forms of DVNs in LVCs, I use other mechanisms such as Unitarization and Reification. In terms of Unitarization, I suggest that people can view an action as a unit by way of considering one action as a representative for the members of its set, which provides a motivation for the process of Unitarization.
On the other hand, for Reification, I adopt Radden and Dirven’s (2007, R & D, in short) proposal that almost all the abstract nouns are regarded as a thing converted from a relation such as verbs or adjectives by way of ‘reification’, and then apply it to the generation of DVNs of LVCs. In contrast with R & D, this study argues that the reification applying to DVNs in LVCs can be classified into four types along the gradient scale with degrees of ‘nouniness’ based on the tests for the grammatical environments preferred for NP: ‘immature reification’ (IR, in short, eg. ‘getting up’): ‘semi-reification’ (SR, in short, eg. ‘a lie-down’), ‘activated reification’ (AR, in short, eg. ‘a walk/walks’) and ‘mature reification’ (MR, in short, eg. ‘marriage’) types. The tests given for dividing types of reification include topicalization, referentiality, co-occurrence with determiners as well as passivization, pronominlization, etc., the latter of which were suggested by Kearns (2002). It should be noted that among these types, SR, AR and MR types are systematically related to DVNs of LVCs under discussion.
The third issue is about indifference toward differences of subtle meanings between LVCs and hea...
Light Verb Constructions in English
The Host`s Receipt Work in Korean Talk-Show Interactions
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2014-09-01 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : -> The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea | |
2014-01-10 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Discourse and Cognition | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-12-29 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 담화ㆍ인지언어학회 -> 담화·인지언어학회영문명 : 미등록 -> | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-04-29 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : 담화와 인지외국어명 : 미등록 | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | |
2000-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.48 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.49 | 0.53 | 0.841 | 0.22 |