It has been suggested that intrinsically and extrinsically motivated individuals have more efficiency to improve creativity than intrinsically motivated individuals. In this study, It needs to be examined whether intrinsically and extrinsically motiva...
It has been suggested that intrinsically and extrinsically motivated individuals have more efficiency to improve creativity than intrinsically motivated individuals. In this study, It needs to be examined whether intrinsically and extrinsically motivated learners have higher level of creativity than intrinsically motivated individuals. The purpose of this research was to identify the relationship between creativity and science process skills by intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.
The research questions were as follows: 1) Was there difference between creativity and science process skills by gender and grade? 2) Was there difference between creativity and science process skills by the types of creative motivation? 3) Was there correlation between creativity and science process skills?
To solve the problems above, 104 (grade 4) and 112 (grade 6) children in an elementary school in Cheongwongun were designated as the subject for this study. The instruments for this study were the Work Preference Inventory (Amabile, 1994), Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (1984, 1990), and the Test of Science Process Skills(Kwon & Kim, 1994). The data were analyzed by t test, one way-ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation.
The results of this research were as follows:
First, there was no difference between gender on creativity. However, there was significant difference between grades on fluency, originality, and elaboration.
Second, intrinsically and extrinsically motivated, and intrinsically motivated individuals had higher level of creativity and science process skills than the others. Third, there was positive correlation between creativity and science basic process skills and specifically between fluency and science basic process skills. Also, there was negative correlation between originality and integrated science process skills.
According to Amabile’s earlier perspective on creativity, intrinsic motivation has a positive influence on creative performance, but extrinsic motivation has a negative influence on creative performance. However, the result of this research has shown that extrinsic motivation also has a positive influence on creativity in the case of context, individual’s motivational orientations, and individual’s cognitive evaluation, which also supports the revised theory of Amabile’s creativity.
Consequently, highly intrinsically and extrinsically-motivated individuals will produce synergy effect by satisfaction of their performance. Creativity can be improved by enhancing both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. To reach more confirmation for our conclusion, more sophisticated and proper methods should be devised.