Abuse of Process and Regulation in Commercial Arbitration – A Chinese Perspective

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper discusses the problem of extraordinary delay in the commercial arbitration process, increased arbitration fees, and denial of the benefits of arbitration to other parties due to the abuse of procedural rights by relevant parties in commercial arbitration process. This paper proposes measures to reduce abuse of process in commercial arbitration, such as statutory modification, judicial supervision, amendment of arbitration rules and the intervention of disciplinary bodies.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Otto Sandrock, "The UK Supreme Court Misses the Point: Estoppel Applies Without the Existence of a Common Intention" 23 : 175-,

2 Juan Eduardo Figueroa Valdes, "The Principle of Kompetenz-Kompetenz in International Commercial Arbitration"

3 Ma Zhihua, "Research on the Procedural Orders in the International Commercial Arbitration and the Necessity of Introducing it into the Arbitration System in China" 2 : 2014

4 J. Disp. Resol, "Recent Developments - The Uniform Arbitration Act"

5 Yasuhei Taniguchi, "Litigation and Justice of Proceedings, translated by Wang Yaxin and Liu Rongjun" China University of Political Science and Law Press 2002

6 Alan Redfern, "Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" 2004

7 Zhao Xiuwen, "International Commercial Arbitration Law" China Renmin University Press

8 Bernardo M. Cremades, "Good Faith in International Arbitration" 27 (27): 761-788, 2012

9 Nana Japaridze, "Fair Enough? Reconciling the Pursuit of Fairness and Justice with Preserving the Nature of International Commercial Arbitration" 36 (36): 13-,

10 Lu Song, "Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration" 2 : 2014

11 E. Allan Farnsworth, "Duties of Good Faith and Fair Dealing under the UNIDROIT Principles, Relevant Conventions and National Laws" 3 : 1995

12 Thomas W. Wälde, "Arbitration under International Investment Agreements" 2010

13 Julie Bédard, "Arbitrating in Good Faith and Protecting the Integrity of the Arbitral Process" 2010

14 L. Ali Khan, "Arbitral Autonomy" 74 : 2013

15 Michele Taruffo, "Abuse of Procedural Right: Comparative Standards of Procedural Fairness" 1 : 2007

16 Lawrence W. Newman, "AAA Yearbook on Arbitration and the Law" Juris Net, LLC 2012