동국신속삼강행실도 언해의 성격에 대하여 = A Study on Translation Characteristics of Dongguksinsoksamganghaengsildo

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Dongguksinsoksamganghaengsildo has different characteristics from the previous Haengsildo-type of literature in terms of the form of editing and the style of translation.
This paper focuses on the distinctive type of translation showed in Dongguksinsoksamganghaengsildo and acknowledging the cause of this differentiation.
The translation of Samganghaengsildo, the most representative work of literature of Haengsildo-type, generally shows typical characteristics of literary translation which does not depend soily on the structure of the original but rather focuses on effective conveyance of the meanings. Although the revised edition of this book sticks to the original, it cannot be considered as a literal translation in a sense that some texts from the original are omitted and there are some additional contents that are not from the original. In a contrast, the translation used in Dongguksinsoksamganghaengsildo largely depicts on literal translation, meaning it depends heavily on the form of the original texts.
This book shows typical characteristics of literal translation such as word-for-word translating, reflecting syntactic structure of the original, using Sino-Korean which was not involved in Korean Lexicon of the day, and using transitional word.
Like this, the reason for the usage of literal translation in Dongguksinsoksamganghaengsildo seems to be the influence from translating works of Confucian Classics which were dominantly performed at that time period. It was published at the same time the publishment of the important Confucian Classics lost during Imjinweran was heading towards the end. These Confucian Classics were absolutely in power since they were nationally well trusted. In addition, the ones who were in charge of translating Confucian Classics also mainly participated in translating this book and therefore, this work of literature differs from the previous Haengsildo-type of literature.
In a conclusion, the distinctive translation of Dongguksinsoksamganghaengsildo seems to result from the absolute power of Confucian Classics rather than the consideration of characteristics of the literature.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이영희, "행실도류 언해서의 국어학적 연구 - 『삼강행실도』와 『동국신속삼강행실도』, 『오륜행실도』의 동일 부분을 중심으로" 24 : 93-106, 2006

2 여찬영, "행실도류 ‘堤上忠烈’의 번역언어학적 연구" 22 : 69-95, 2005

3 여찬영, "행실도류 ‘吉再抗節’의 번역언어학적 분석" 언어과학회 35 : 65-88, 2005

4 이영경, "칠서언해의 국어사적 의의" 한국국학진흥원 91-108, 2011

5 여찬영, "조선조 언해서의 번역비평적 연구" 배달말학회 (33) : 239-262, 2003

6 이호권, "조선시대 한글 문헌 간행의 시기별 경향과 특징" 한국어학회 41 : 83-114, 2008

7 황문환, "유교 윤리의 모범 사례, 『오륜행실도』, in 정조대의 한글 문헌" 문헌과해석사 168-181, 2000

8 송철의, "역주 오륜행실도" 서울대출판부 2006

9 이영경, "속삼강행실도 연구" 서울대국문과 2 : 81-120, 1994

10 고니시 도시오, "삼강행실효자도 의 한문과 언해문 대조" 서울대국문과 2 : 9-22, 1994

11 신선경, "삼강행실도의 이본 비교" 서울대국문과 2 : 45-63, 1994

12 홍윤표, "삼강행실도 의 서지 및 국어사적 의의" 85 : 141-162, 1998

13 이영희, "삼강행실도 와 『동국신속삼강행실도』, 『오륜행실도』 언해 양상 비교 연구 - 동일 내용을 중심으로" 6 : 125-143, 2006

14 이광렬, "동국신속삼강행실찬집청의궤 해제, in 동국신속삼강행실찬집청의궤" 서울대 규장각 2002

15 홍윤표, "동국신속삼강행실도, in 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구" 문학과지성사 1993

16 홍윤표, "근대국어연구(Ⅰ)" 태학사 1994

17 안병희, "국어사 자료 연구" 문학과지성사 1992

18 안병희, "국어사 문헌 연구" 신구문화사 2009

19 이충구, "경서언해 연구" 성균관대 1990

20 신성철, "『東國新續三綱行實圖』의 국어사적 고찰" 한국어문학회 (107) : 65-90, 2010