RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      건축물 화재안전등급 인증제도의 도입방안 = A Study on the Introduction of Building Fire-safety Rating Certification

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The form and structure of building connected with human life inextricably are different according to the nations and regions, have changed and developed. The building may enhance the spatial value for human being in using the fire in it. However, if a fire breaks out, it can threaten human life and body and cause damage to property. The state has a duty to prevent outbreak of fire previously, to prepare for extinguishing fire rapidly and to respond to minimize damage in the process of fire fighting.
      For this purpose, laws relevant to fire-fighting have made and operated, such as "Framework Act on Fire Services", "Installation, Maintenance and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting System Act", "Safety Control of Dangerous Substances Act", "Fire-Fighting System Installation Business Act", and "Special Act on the Safety Control of Publicly Used Establishments" etc. Nevertheless, the fire of building and loss of life and property caused by fire have not decreased. Even though fire safety is not a task for government and local government alone, it may be an important task given to state. Therefore, the state should make and modify system in order to strengthen fire management of building protecting life, body and property from the building fire and encourage the building's owner to make efforts to fire safety voluntarily etc.
      In this aspect, this paper is focused to review the fire safety rating certification system on building which can decrease damage caused by building fire, and to analyze compliance of introducing this system in laws relevant to fire-fighting. It is practically difficult that the installation and maintenance standards of building fire safety facilities can be established stronger than requirements of current fire-fighting laws. Asking building's owners to install fire safety equipment excessively high level could restrict his freedom of business. It needs validity and necessity to introduce building fire safety rating certification system, because this is arbitrary system to encourage building's owners and managers to install fire-fighting equipments more than the level required by the fire relevant laws. Building fire safety rating certification requires the legal basis at the request of unified and specialized ability.
      This study examined the specific introduction plan of Building's fire safety rating certification. Specifically, in this study, the issues on designation of certification authority, certification standards, links between new building certification system and existing system, and relationship with building safety certification in the private sector have been showed.
      번역하기

      The form and structure of building connected with human life inextricably are different according to the nations and regions, have changed and developed. The building may enhance the spatial value for human being in using the fire in it. However, if a...

      The form and structure of building connected with human life inextricably are different according to the nations and regions, have changed and developed. The building may enhance the spatial value for human being in using the fire in it. However, if a fire breaks out, it can threaten human life and body and cause damage to property. The state has a duty to prevent outbreak of fire previously, to prepare for extinguishing fire rapidly and to respond to minimize damage in the process of fire fighting.
      For this purpose, laws relevant to fire-fighting have made and operated, such as "Framework Act on Fire Services", "Installation, Maintenance and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting System Act", "Safety Control of Dangerous Substances Act", "Fire-Fighting System Installation Business Act", and "Special Act on the Safety Control of Publicly Used Establishments" etc. Nevertheless, the fire of building and loss of life and property caused by fire have not decreased. Even though fire safety is not a task for government and local government alone, it may be an important task given to state. Therefore, the state should make and modify system in order to strengthen fire management of building protecting life, body and property from the building fire and encourage the building's owner to make efforts to fire safety voluntarily etc.
      In this aspect, this paper is focused to review the fire safety rating certification system on building which can decrease damage caused by building fire, and to analyze compliance of introducing this system in laws relevant to fire-fighting. It is practically difficult that the installation and maintenance standards of building fire safety facilities can be established stronger than requirements of current fire-fighting laws. Asking building's owners to install fire safety equipment excessively high level could restrict his freedom of business. It needs validity and necessity to introduce building fire safety rating certification system, because this is arbitrary system to encourage building's owners and managers to install fire-fighting equipments more than the level required by the fire relevant laws. Building fire safety rating certification requires the legal basis at the request of unified and specialized ability.
      This study examined the specific introduction plan of Building's fire safety rating certification. Specifically, in this study, the issues on designation of certification authority, certification standards, links between new building certification system and existing system, and relationship with building safety certification in the private sector have been showed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 화재안전관리의 헌법적 정당성
      • Ⅲ. 건축물 화재안전등급 인증의 체계
      • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
      • 참고문헌
      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 화재안전관리의 헌법적 정당성
      • Ⅲ. 건축물 화재안전등급 인증의 체계
      • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김용환, "홉스의 사회·정치철학: 「리바이어던」 읽기" 철학과 현실사 1999

      2 유정갑, "홉스의 국가론과 평화 사상" 철학과 현실사 2005

      3 서정욱, "홉스가 들려주는 리바이어던 이야기" 자음과 모음 2006

      4 문지영, "홉스 & 로크: 국가를 계약하라" 김영사 2007

      5 한스 마이어, "정치사상의 거장들: 고대·중세편1: 플라톤에서 홉스까지" 시와 진실 2008

      6 이종영, "전자파의 위험가능성에 관한 법적 문제" 24 (24): 1996

      7 이종영, "위험물시설의 설치허가제도의 개선방안" 15 (15): 2001

      8 이종영, "식품안전성확보와 식품첨가물의 허용한계치" 5 (5): 2003

      9 이종영, "소방법의 분법화 방안" (3) : 2001

      10 노상헌, "산업안전보건법의 제정과 쟁점" 2010

      1 김용환, "홉스의 사회·정치철학: 「리바이어던」 읽기" 철학과 현실사 1999

      2 유정갑, "홉스의 국가론과 평화 사상" 철학과 현실사 2005

      3 서정욱, "홉스가 들려주는 리바이어던 이야기" 자음과 모음 2006

      4 문지영, "홉스 & 로크: 국가를 계약하라" 김영사 2007

      5 한스 마이어, "정치사상의 거장들: 고대·중세편1: 플라톤에서 홉스까지" 시와 진실 2008

      6 이종영, "전자파의 위험가능성에 관한 법적 문제" 24 (24): 1996

      7 이종영, "위험물시설의 설치허가제도의 개선방안" 15 (15): 2001

      8 이종영, "식품안전성확보와 식품첨가물의 허용한계치" 5 (5): 2003

      9 이종영, "소방법의 분법화 방안" (3) : 2001

      10 노상헌, "산업안전보건법의 제정과 쟁점" 2010

      11 이종영, "산업기계ㆍ기구의 의무안전인증제도" 한국법제연구원 39 (39): 223-265, 2010

      12 최규출, "사회복지시설의 화재안전관리에 관한 연구" 한국화재소방학회 27 (27): 1-7, 2013

      13 남경희, "말의 질서와 국가 : 근대 서구 정치철학의 비판과 재해석" 이화여자대학교출판부 1997

      14 토머스 홉스, "리바이어던: 교회국가 및 시민국가의 재료와 형태 및 권력" 나남 2008

      15 이종영, "독일 소비자제품안전법" (22) : 1999

      16 이종영, "건축물 에너지효율관리제도" 한국법제연구원 2013

      17 Schubert. G., "Zwanzig Jahre Gentechnikgesetz–eine Erfolgsgeschichte?" NVwZ 2010

      18 Böhret. C./, "Technologiefolgenabschätzung: institztionelle und verfahrensmäßige Lösungsansätze"

      19 Yi. J-Y., "Staatszielbestimmung Umweltschutz in der Bayerischen Verfassung und ihre Auswirkung bei der Ausführung von Bundesgesetz - am Beispiel Atomgesetz und Bundesimmissionschutzgesetz"

      20 Simons. R., "Staatliche Gewerbeaufsicht und gewerbliche Berufsgenissenschaften"

      21 Günther. R./, "Sicherheit als Wert und individuelles Bedürfnis"

      22 Bechmann. G., "Risiko und Gesellschaft"

      23 Gusy. Ch, "Rechtsgüterschutz als Staatsaufgabe - Verfassungsfragen der Staatsaufgabe Sicherheit"

      24 Kloepfer. M., "Rechts ermöglicht Technik - zu einer wenig beachteten Funktion des Umwelt - und Technikrechts" NuR 1997

      25 Ingold. A., "Nochmals: Das Aufgabenübertragungsverbot (Art. GG Artikel 84 Abs. GG Artikel 84 Absatz 1 Satz 7 GG) – Replik auf Andreas Meßmann, Das Aufgabenübertragungsverbot aus Art. GG Artikel 84 Abs. GG Artikel 84 Absatz 1 Satz 7 GG: Hindernis für die Erweiterung bereits übertragener Aufgaben und die Übertragung von Angelegenheiten der örtlichen Gemeinschaft?"

      26 Hebeler. T., "Ist der Gesetzgeber verfassungsrechtlich verpflichtet, Gesetze zu begründen? – Grundsätzliche Überlegungen anlässlich des Bundesverfassungsgerichtsurteils zur Leistungsgestaltung im SGB II"

      27 Grunwald. A., "Die rationale Gestaltung der technischen Zukunft" Rationale Technikfolgenbeurteilung

      28 Klein. H. H., "Die grundrechtliche Schutzpflicht" DVBl 489-, 1994

      29 Fischer. K., "Die Zulässigkeit aufgedrängten staatlichen Schutzes vor Selbstschädigung"

      30 Beck. U., "Die Verhältnismäßigkeit nachträglicher Anordnungen nach §17 BImSchG"

      31 Kersting, Einleitung, "Die Begründung der politischen Philosophie der Neuzeit im Leviathan"

      32 Schmitt. C., "Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes"

      33 Heim. A. R., "Der Begriff Sicherheit in Art.5 der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention und der Humanitätsgedanke in der schweizerischen außervertraglichen Haftpflichtgesetzgebung"

      34 Beaucamp. G., "Das Konzept der zukunftsfähigen Entwicklung im Recht: Untersuchungen zur völkerrechtlichen, europäischen, verfassungsrechtlichen und verwaltungsrechtlichen Relevanz eines neuen politischen Leitbildes"

      35 Hermes. G., "Das Grundrecht auf Schutz von Leben und Gesundheit: Schutzpflicht und Schutzanspruch aus Art.2 Abs.2 Satz 1 GG"

      36 Meßmann. A., "Das Aufgabenübertragungsverbot aus Art. GG Artikel 84 Abs. GG Artikel 84 Absatz 1 Satz 7 GG: Hindernis für die Erweiterung bereits übertragener Aufgaben und die Übertragung von Angelegenheiten der örtlichen Gemeinschaft? – Zugleich eine Erwiderung auf Albert Ingold, Das Aufgabenübertragungsverbot aus Art. GG Artikel 84 Abs. GG Artikel 84 Absatz 1 Satz 7 GG als Hindernis für die bauplanungsrechtliche Gesetzgebung des Bundes?"

      37 Kothe. H. W., "Arbeitnehmerhaftung und Arbeitgeberrisiko"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-02-15 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.67 0.67 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.49 0.682 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼