RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      국제장기상거래계약에서의 재협상 및 계약변경에 관한 연구: 원계약 상 관련 조항이 포함되지 않은 계약을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107138922

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In case of international long-term transactions, there are various risks of economic change of circumstances including skyrocketing price increase and shortage of raw material, as well as force majeure in a general sense. Nevertheless, pretty many of international long-term commercial contracts do not include the provisions of renegotiation and adaptation of the contract. In this case, possibility of renegotiation and adaptation depends mainly on the applicable law. Namely, it may be possible or not, according to choice of law. The reason is that national laws have nuances each other, and most of national courts are traditionally reluctant to accept hardship. and also, provisions of international uniform law (CISG) has ambiguity and inflexibility in relation to the problems of change of circumstances. Accordingly, this paper analyzes comparatively the doctrines and provisions related to renegotiation and adaptation of contracts of the most representative countries such as England, U.S.A., France, Germany as well as provisions CISG and soft law such as PICC. By doing so, the author makes clear which laws of instruments is more flexible or acceptable in allowing renegotiation and adaptation of long-term commercial contracts, and emphasizes on the importance of inclusion of express terms by using other alternative supplementing clauses, as a best solution for settling the problems of legal uncertainty of contract in relation to renegotiation and adaptation.
      번역하기

      In case of international long-term transactions, there are various risks of economic change of circumstances including skyrocketing price increase and shortage of raw material, as well as force majeure in a general sense. Nevertheless, pretty many of ...

      In case of international long-term transactions, there are various risks of economic change of circumstances including skyrocketing price increase and shortage of raw material, as well as force majeure in a general sense. Nevertheless, pretty many of international long-term commercial contracts do not include the provisions of renegotiation and adaptation of the contract. In this case, possibility of renegotiation and adaptation depends mainly on the applicable law. Namely, it may be possible or not, according to choice of law. The reason is that national laws have nuances each other, and most of national courts are traditionally reluctant to accept hardship. and also, provisions of international uniform law (CISG) has ambiguity and inflexibility in relation to the problems of change of circumstances. Accordingly, this paper analyzes comparatively the doctrines and provisions related to renegotiation and adaptation of contracts of the most representative countries such as England, U.S.A., France, Germany as well as provisions CISG and soft law such as PICC. By doing so, the author makes clear which laws of instruments is more flexible or acceptable in allowing renegotiation and adaptation of long-term commercial contracts, and emphasizes on the importance of inclusion of express terms by using other alternative supplementing clauses, as a best solution for settling the problems of legal uncertainty of contract in relation to renegotiation and adaptation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 허광욱, "불가항력과 Hardship에 관한 연구" 한국항만경제학회 21 (21): 219-238, 2005

      2 김선국, "불가항력 및 사정변경의 원칙에 관한 계약과 관련한 주요 국제적인 규범들 규정의 비교.검토 - UNIDROIT Principles, PECL 및 CISG를 중심으로 -" 한국기업법학회 13 : 229-245, 2003

      3 심종석, "국제상사계약에 있어 유럽계약법원칙의 보충법리 및 그 상무적 적용가능성에 관한 연구 - 계약책임을 중심으로 CISG, PICC와의 비교법적 고찰 -" 한국경영법률학회 17 (17): 269-322, 2007

      4 오현석, "국제상거래법상 Force Majeure와 Hardship에 관한 고찰" 한국무역상무학회 69 : 179-199, 2016

      5 우광명, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔 협약에서 사정변경의 원칙에 관한 사례 연구" 한국무역연구원 10 (10): 213-233, 2014

      6 "Vital Berry Marketing NV v. Dira-Frost NV Rechtbank van Koophande, Hasselt AR 1849/94, CISG-on line 371"

      7 Veneziano, A., "UNIDROIT Principles and CISG: Change of Circumstances and Duty to Renegotiate according to the Belgium Supreme Court" 15 (15): 137-151, 2010

      8 오원석, "UNIDROIT Principles 2004의 變更·新設內容의 槪觀" 한국무역상무학회 25 : 41-74, 2005

      9 Yoon, Chung-Weon, "Trade Policy and Trade Law of the United States" Jipmoondang 40-46, 2004

      10 Bonell, M. J., "The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts and the Harmonization of International Sales Law" (36) : 343-351, 2002

      1 허광욱, "불가항력과 Hardship에 관한 연구" 한국항만경제학회 21 (21): 219-238, 2005

      2 김선국, "불가항력 및 사정변경의 원칙에 관한 계약과 관련한 주요 국제적인 규범들 규정의 비교.검토 - UNIDROIT Principles, PECL 및 CISG를 중심으로 -" 한국기업법학회 13 : 229-245, 2003

      3 심종석, "국제상사계약에 있어 유럽계약법원칙의 보충법리 및 그 상무적 적용가능성에 관한 연구 - 계약책임을 중심으로 CISG, PICC와의 비교법적 고찰 -" 한국경영법률학회 17 (17): 269-322, 2007

      4 오현석, "국제상거래법상 Force Majeure와 Hardship에 관한 고찰" 한국무역상무학회 69 : 179-199, 2016

      5 우광명, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔 협약에서 사정변경의 원칙에 관한 사례 연구" 한국무역연구원 10 (10): 213-233, 2014

      6 "Vital Berry Marketing NV v. Dira-Frost NV Rechtbank van Koophande, Hasselt AR 1849/94, CISG-on line 371"

      7 Veneziano, A., "UNIDROIT Principles and CISG: Change of Circumstances and Duty to Renegotiate according to the Belgium Supreme Court" 15 (15): 137-151, 2010

      8 오원석, "UNIDROIT Principles 2004의 變更·新設內容의 槪觀" 한국무역상무학회 25 : 41-74, 2005

      9 Yoon, Chung-Weon, "Trade Policy and Trade Law of the United States" Jipmoondang 40-46, 2004

      10 Bonell, M. J., "The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts and the Harmonization of International Sales Law" (36) : 343-351, 2002

      11 Al-Emadi, T. A., "The Renegotiating Clause in Petroleum International Joint Venture Agreements" (4) : 19-22, 2012

      12 Agro, E. F., "The Impact of UNIDROIT Principles in International Dispute Resolution in Figures" 16 (16): 719-733, 2011

      13 Zaccaria, E. C., "The Effects of Changed Circumstances in International Commercial Trade" 9 (9): 141-142, 2004

      14 Baranauskas, E, "The Effect of Change of Circumstances on the Performance of Contract" 4 : 199-206, 2009

      15 Klepac, L., "The Availability of a Hardship Defense under the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)" Central European University 2017

      16 Suditu, A., "The Application of the Hardship Theory" 50-51, 2011

      17 Bedernam, D. J., "The 1981 London Declaration, Rebus Sic Stantibus and Primitivist View of the Law of Nation" 82 (82): 8-, 1988

      18 Sornarajah, M., "Supremacy of Renegotiations Clause in International Contracts" 5 : 113-, 1988

      19 "Scafom International v. Lorraine Tube SA (2009) Hof van Cassatie C.07.0289.N, CISG-on line 1963"

      20 Al Qurashi, Z. A., "Renegotiation of International Petroleum Agreements" 22 (22): 270-273, 2005

      21 Kröll, S., "Renegotiation and Adaptation of Investment Contracts" 2 (2): 12-35, 2004

      22 Hamad, S. A., "Renegotiation Clauses in International Petroleum Contracts" Near East University 2017

      23 "RG 03 February 1922, RGZ 103, 328 (Vigogne-Spinneri)"

      24 Chowdhury, S., "Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources" 1986

      25 Wehberg, H., "Pacta Sunt Servanda" 53 (53): 775-, 1959

      26 "Nuova Fucinati v. Fondmetal International [199] Tribunale Civile di Monza R. G. 4267/88, CISG-on line 102"

      27 Handy, C. R., "No Act of Good Necessary: Expanding Beyond Louisiana’s Force Majeure Doctrine to Impévision" 79 (79): 266-272, 2019

      28 "Iron Molybdenum Case Oberlandesgericht (Hanseatisches Overlandesgerich) U 167/95, CISG-on line 261"

      29 "ICC Award No.8502"

      30 "ICC Award No.7375"

      31 "ICC Award No.7365"

      32 "ICC Award No.7110"

      33 "ICC Award No.116"

      34 Schmitthoff, C. M., "Hardship and Intervener Clauses" 82-91, 1980

      35 McKendrick, E., "Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law" Clarendon Press 305-, 1995

      36 "Gaz de Bordeaux case"

      37 Mazzacano, P. J., "Force Majeure, Impossibility, Frustration & the Like: Excuse for Non-performance – the Historical Origins and Development of an Autonomous Commercial Norm in CISG" (2) : 6-, 2011

      38 Rimke, J, "Force Majeure and Hardship: Application in International Trade Practice – with Specific Regard to the CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts" Institute of International Commercial Law, Pace University

      39 Schwenzer, I., "Force Majeure and Hardship in International Sales Contracts" 39 (39): 712-, 2008

      40 McKendrick, E., "Force Majeure and Frustration of Contract" Informa Law from Routledge 27-, 1995

      41 Jenkins, S. H., "Exemption for Nonperformance: UCC, CISG, UNIDROIT Principles – A Comparative Assessment" 72 : 2018-, 1988

      42 DiMatteo, L. A., "Contractual Excuse Under the CISG: Impediment, Hardship, and the Excuse Doctrines" 27 (27): 262-264, 2015

      43 Crystal, N. M, "Contract Enforceability During Economic Crisis: Legal Principles and Drafting Solutions" 10 (10): 15-16, 2010

      44 Goode R., "Commercial Law" Penguin Books 140-, 1995

      45 Schlechtriem, P., "Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods" Oxford University Press 618-, 1998

      46 Tallon, D., "Commentary on the International Sales Law - 1980 Vienna Sales Convention" Giuffré 592-, 1987

      47 Arroyo, C., "Change of Circumstances under the CISG" 2012

      48 Uribe, R. M., "Change of Circumstances in International Instruments of Contract Law - The Approach of The CISG, PICC, PECL and DCFR" 15 (15): 239-, 2011

      49 "Cass. civ. Mar. 6, 1874, D. P. I. 179"

      50 "BGFI 16 January 1953, MDR (Monatsschtift für Deutsches Recht)"

      51 Atiyah, P. S., "An Introduction to The Law of Contract" Oxford University Press 8-, 1981

      52 Atiyah, P. S., "An Introduction to The Law of Contract" Clarendon Press 244-, 1995

      53 Bonell, M. J., "An International Restatement of Contract Law: The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts" Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 27-45, 2005

      54 "Aluminum Co. of America (ALCOA) v. Essex Group Inc., 499 F. Supp. 53 (W. D. Pa 1980)"

      55 Horn, N., "Adaptation and Renegotiation of Contracts in International Trade and Finance" Kluwer Law International 25-, 1985

      56 Kull, I., "About Grounds for Exemption from Performance under the Draft Estonian Law of Obligations Act (Pacta Sunt Servanda versus Clausula Rebus Sic Stantibus)" 6 : 45-46, 2001

      57 Yoon, Joo-Young, "A Study on the Legal Doctrines of Force Majeure and Its Practical Application to the Contracts of International Sales of Goods" Jeonbuk National University 2017

      58 Huh, Jae-chang, "A Study on Force Majeure and Hardship in International Sales Contract" (6) : 165-167, 2005

      59 Chung, G., "A Comparative Analysis of the Frustration Rule: Possibility of Reconciliation Between Hong Kong - Interventionist Mechanism" 25 (25): 125-127, 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.01 1.01 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.98 0.9 1.149 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼