비교교육학에서 교육행정학의 위상 = Status of Education Administration in Comparative education study

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was attempted to establish the connection of two disciplines by confirming the status of the educational administration in the context of Korean comparative education. To accomplish this, the major research fields of the Korean Association for Comparative Education were investigated, and the status of educational administration was examined through a coauthor network in the 「Comparative Education Research」. Moreover, the main terms were also analyzed related to educational administration as the keyword in the 「Comparative Education Research」 as research trends of educational administration in the context of comparative education were also studied.
Results revealed that there are 40.85% of studies related to educational administration. This percentage may be the basis of the opinion that the academic bias of the organization leading the comparative education research is very high. For advocating balanced development of comparative pedagogy, it is suggested to complement the organizational structure of the institute and assign a researcher to represent various subcommittees of the organization.
Second, through the co-authors' network, Korea's comparative education society can confirm that the Small Club of the educational administration scholars can lead the society. This phenomenon contributes to the solid leadership of the society, and it is advantageous to promote the efficiency of the operation of the society and prevent the absence of leadership, as the academic tendency can be shifted to one side of education administration.
Third, in the text network analysis through the keywords, it was confirmed that education administration is the second highest research topic in the comparative education. It shows that research focused on the United States is changing toward Korea. This means that the contents of the study are diversified through comparative studies between Korea and foreign countries in the form of introducing overseas cases to the center of educational administrative research in comparative education. In terms of content, it can be seen that gradual progress has been made in the areas of high school, high school, and middle school.
In the context of Korea's comparative education, education administration was perceived to have a high level of consideration. This high linkage should not act as a factor to hinder the academic identity of comparative education. The Korean Association for Comparative Education should gradually expand its academic outlook. It is desirable that the status of educational administration in comparative pedagogy be maintained at an appropriate scale.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박선형, "호주의 고등교육개혁과 오세아니아 비교교육학 연구동향 분석" 한국비교교육학회 26 (26): 61-89, 2016

2 성경륭, "한국행정학의 발전과 위상에 대한 사회학자의 견해" 169-177, 1996

3 박한우, "한국어의 내용분석을 위한 KrKwic 프로그램의 이해와 적용 : Daum.net에서 제공된 지역혁신에 관한 뉴스를 대상으로" 한국자료분석학회 6 (6): 1377-1387, 2004

4 서정화, "한국교육행정학회의 역할과 기여에 관한 고찰" 한국교육행정학회 26 (26): 119-139, 2008

5 "한국교육학회 웹사이트"

6 권동택, "한국 비교교육학의 연구동향-「비교교육연구」게재 논문을 중심으로-" 155-166, 2015

7 임연기, "한국 교육행정학 연구의 성과와 과제" 한국교육행정학회 32 (32): 415-437, 2014

8 고득환, "텍스트 네트워크 분석(TNA)을 통한 한국 비교교육 연구경향 분석" 교육종합연구소 15 (15): 127-152, 2017

9 한국정부학회, "지역사회에서 행정학의 위상" 24 (24): 29-32, 2012

10 한국비교교육학회, "세계문화와 교육(창간호) ~ 비교교육연구, 26(6)"

11 이보람, "서지결합분석을 통한 빅데이터 활용 분야 연구" 19-22, 2016

12 임수진, "미국 비교교육학 연구 동향 분석 - Comparative Education Review 논문을 중심으로 -" 한국비교교육학회 26 (26): 1-33, 2016

13 박남기, "단행본에 드러난 미국 비교교육학 연구 특성 및 흐름 분석" 한국비교교육학회 26 (26): 35-60, 2016

14 이수상, "네트워크 분석 방법론" 논형 2012

15 "OCIES 웹사이트"

16 David Phillips, "Comparative Education: method" 1 (1): 304-319, 2006

17 "CIES 웹사이트"

18 "CESE 웹사이트"

19 강순원, "21세기 유럽 비교교육학의 동향 - Euro-centrism극복의 과제 -" 한국비교교육학회 26 (26): 1-21, 2016