일제 식민지시기 산불대책 = 관리의 영역으로 들어온 산불

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Studies of the Colonial authorities’ forest policy, during the Japanese occupation period, have so far concentrated upon examining how the forest resources were managed and exploited. As it was important for the authorities to survey the overall size of Joseon forests (and who owned them as well) in order to manage and monitor forest resources efficiently and effectively, colonial authorities launched certain projects in such vein, and those projects have been well studied by today’s researchers.
Yet how the authorities were endowed with such power over forests, as well as the right to manage forests in the first place, was somewhat absent from previous studies. With the intention to compensate for such absence, the issue of forest protection will be examined in this article, in terms of the authorities’ supposed plans for fire fighting, which the colonial authorities claimed as stemming from their will to protect and preserve forests. By doing so we may see how the issue of forest fires entered the realm of state management to begin with.
Of course, forest fires were initially never the priority of concern for colonial authorities, as earlier they had no reason to deem the issue either worthy or necessary. It was only natural for them to turn their attention to such issue (forest fires) in times when the Bukseon reclamation project was launched and wartime mobilization was firing up full scale. The authorities had to monitor all those forest fires because they needed all the woods they could get, and that was how forest fires entered their range of interests. With a systemic preservation policy in place, at least some of the forest fires may have been prevented. But the effect such policy ultimately had upon the forests in general should be assessed from a more balanced point of view, as such policy was intent upon utilizing all the forest resources, just as much as it was claimed to be interested in preserving them. In that regard, forest fires should be considered as a topic that could reveal both the effects and shortcomings of the colonial authorities’ intentions and efforts.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 식민지시기 산불현황
• 2. 산림정책의 변화와 산불문제 인식
• 3. 식민당국의 산불관리
• 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한국산림청, "한국임정50년사" 산림청 1997

2 최병택, "조선총독부의 화전 정리 사업" 규장각한국학연구원 (58) : 139-177, 2012

3 김동현, "조선왕조시대 산불방지정책 고찰" 25 : 2011

4 김동현, "조선시대(1392~1910)의 산불정책에 관한 연구" 한국방재학회 12 (12): 217-221, 2012

5 최병택, "일제하 조선임야조사사업과 산림정책" 푸른역사 2009

6 최병택, "일제하 전시체제기(1937~1945) 임업동원책과 삼림자원 공출" 고려사학회 (32) : 267-305, 2008

7 김종근, "일제하 京城의 홍수에 대한 식민정부의 대응 양상 분석- 정치생태학적 관점에서" 한국사연구회 (157) : 291-327, 2012

8 정재정, "일제침략과 한국철도 1892~1945" 서울대학교출판부 1999

9 강만길, "일제시대 빈민생활사 연구" 창작과비평사 2013

10 고태우, "일제시기 재해문제와 ‘자선·기부문화’ - 전통·근대화·‘공공성’ -" 국학연구원 (168) : 147-184, 2014

11 김영미, "일제시기 경성 이촌동민들의 수해대책운동과 지역정치" 5 : 2006

12 고태우, "일제 식민권력의 재해대책 추이와 성격" 역사문제연구소 18 (18): 352-398, 2014

13 최병택, "일제 강점기 연료용 임산물 생산·유통 통제와 그 변화" 대구사학회 119 : 249-284, 2015

14 김동현, "역사문헌 고찰을 통한 조선시대 산불특성 분석" 한국화재소방학회 25 (25): 8-21, 2011

15 배재수, "식민지기 조선의 목재수급 추이 및 특성" 경제사학회 38 : 93-118, 2005

16 이명욱, "산불통계로 본 우리나라의 산불특성 연구" 한국방재학회 12 (12): 185-192, 2012

17 한국산림청, "산림과 임업기술" 산림청 2000

18 요아힘 라트카우, "나무時代" 자연과생태 2013

19 이우연, "植民地期 林野所有權의 整理: 山林綠化와 所有權" 경제사학회 40 : 21-55, 2006

20 이우연, "植民地期 林業의 近代化: 採取林業에서 育成林業으로" 경제사학회 38 : 119-156, 2005

21 姜英心, "日帝의 한국삼림수탈과 한국인의 저항" 梨花女子大學校 大學院 1998

22 박철하, "1925년 서울지역 수해이재민 구제활동과 수해대책" 13 : 1999