We comment on a new testing procedure for testing exponentiality against different ageing classes. We show that the proposed test is inappropriate at least for two alternatives. We point out the subtle flaw in their argument.
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105398561
2009
English
학술저널
59-62(4쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
We comment on a new testing procedure for testing exponentiality against different ageing classes. We show that the proposed test is inappropriate at least for two alternatives. We point out the subtle flaw in their argument.
We comment on a new testing procedure for testing exponentiality against different ageing classes. We show that the proposed test is inappropriate at least for two alternatives. We point out the subtle flaw in their argument.
Improvement of an Early Failure Rate By-Using Neural Control Chart
Reliability Equivalence Factors of Non-identical Components Series System with Mixture Failure Rates
A Note on Age Replacement Policy of Used Item at Age to
Reliability Equivalence Factors of n-components Series System with Non-constant Failure Rates