RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정치적 웃음을 통해 본 15세기 후반~16세기 전반 필기(筆記)의 구도와 양상 = A Study on the disposition and aspects of miscellanies seen through political laughter in the late 15th century~the early 16th century

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109059207

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In order to understand the disposition of miscellanies from the late 15th century to the early 16th century and changes over time, this study examined the miscellanies of this period through the lens of political laughter. The following results were confirmed by focusing mainly on desire and stubbornness at a individual level, literature and academics at a cultural level, and the family system and perspectives on women at a social level.
    First, in the case of the individual level, the group that showed a flexible attitude toward desire valued diversity and inclusion, while the contrasting group emphasized the suppressing desires and the absoluteness of duty and affirmed the observance of principles. Those who judged their era to be the stabilization period prioritized tolerance and public governance, while those who saw it as a time to be the reform period adopted Confucianism to approach the ideal politics. The cause must be found in the fact that the principle of Confucianism and the absoluteness of duty was emphasized. Next, although they showed different perspectives on desire and stubbornness, in most of their miscellanies during this period, an attitude of emphasizing the combination of academics and literature and the national ability of literature could be confirmed. The reason is that the compiler in the late 15th century∼the early 16th century generally did not separate literature from politics and morality. Lastly, from a social perspective, the miscellanies of this period reflected the Confucianization of the Joseon Dynasty. In other words, the early aspects of Confucianization could be seen in miscellanies from the late 15th century, and the transitional aspects could be seen in articles and illustrations from the early 16th century. These changes are related to the gradual rise in power of the group that pursued moral politics while emphasizing Neo-Confucian justification and duty.
    In this regard, the meaning of this study can be found in that it presented a useful methodological framework for analyzing a miscellany, hypothesized the disposition of in the late 15th century∼the early 16th century, and inferred the cause and background.
    번역하기

    In order to understand the disposition of miscellanies from the late 15th century to the early 16th century and changes over time, this study examined the miscellanies of this period through the lens of political laughter. The following results were c...

    In order to understand the disposition of miscellanies from the late 15th century to the early 16th century and changes over time, this study examined the miscellanies of this period through the lens of political laughter. The following results were confirmed by focusing mainly on desire and stubbornness at a individual level, literature and academics at a cultural level, and the family system and perspectives on women at a social level.
    First, in the case of the individual level, the group that showed a flexible attitude toward desire valued diversity and inclusion, while the contrasting group emphasized the suppressing desires and the absoluteness of duty and affirmed the observance of principles. Those who judged their era to be the stabilization period prioritized tolerance and public governance, while those who saw it as a time to be the reform period adopted Confucianism to approach the ideal politics. The cause must be found in the fact that the principle of Confucianism and the absoluteness of duty was emphasized. Next, although they showed different perspectives on desire and stubbornness, in most of their miscellanies during this period, an attitude of emphasizing the combination of academics and literature and the national ability of literature could be confirmed. The reason is that the compiler in the late 15th century∼the early 16th century generally did not separate literature from politics and morality. Lastly, from a social perspective, the miscellanies of this period reflected the Confucianization of the Joseon Dynasty. In other words, the early aspects of Confucianization could be seen in miscellanies from the late 15th century, and the transitional aspects could be seen in articles and illustrations from the early 16th century. These changes are related to the gradual rise in power of the group that pursued moral politics while emphasizing Neo-Confucian justification and duty.
    In this regard, the meaning of this study can be found in that it presented a useful methodological framework for analyzing a miscellany, hypothesized the disposition of in the late 15th century∼the early 16th century, and inferred the cause and background.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 블라지미르 쁘로쁘, "희극성과 웃음" 나남 2010

    2 陳必祥, "한문문체론" 이회 2001

    3 최연식, "한국정치사상사" 백산서당 2005

    4 윤사순, "한국유학사상론" 열음사 1992

    5 李秉烋, "한국사 28" 국사편찬위원회 2013

    6 김준형, "한국 패설문학 연구" 보고사 2004

    7 최재석, "한국 초기사회학과 가족의 연구" 일지사 2002

    8 마르티나 도이힐러, "한국 사회의 유교전 전환" 아카넷 2005

    9 이홍식 ; 박은정, "패관잡기(稗官雜記)의 야사적 특징 연구" 한양대학교 동아시아문화연구소 95 : 2023

    10 계승범, "중종의 시대 : 조선이 유교화와 사림운동" 역사비평사 2014

    1 블라지미르 쁘로쁘, "희극성과 웃음" 나남 2010

    2 陳必祥, "한문문체론" 이회 2001

    3 최연식, "한국정치사상사" 백산서당 2005

    4 윤사순, "한국유학사상론" 열음사 1992

    5 李秉烋, "한국사 28" 국사편찬위원회 2013

    6 김준형, "한국 패설문학 연구" 보고사 2004

    7 최재석, "한국 초기사회학과 가족의 연구" 일지사 2002

    8 마르티나 도이힐러, "한국 사회의 유교전 전환" 아카넷 2005

    9 이홍식 ; 박은정, "패관잡기(稗官雜記)의 야사적 특징 연구" 한양대학교 동아시아문화연구소 95 : 2023

    10 계승범, "중종의 시대 : 조선이 유교화와 사림운동" 역사비평사 2014

    11 유엽추, "중국역대필기" 신서원 2007

    12 피터 K. 볼, "중국 지식인들과 정체성 : 사문(斯文)을 통해 본 당송 시대 지성사의 대변화" 북스토리 2008

    13 김 돈, "조선중기 정치사 연구" 국학자료원 2013

    14 장병인, "조선전기 혼인제와 성차별" 일지사 1999

    15 곽미라, "조선전기 사대부문학과 筆記 : "靑坡劇談"소재 ‘笑話’를 중심으로" 근역한문학회 45 : 2021

    16 윤인숙, "조선 전기의 사림과 〈소학〉" 역사비평사 2016

    17 카를 슈미트, "정치적인 것의 개념" 살림 2012

    18 이숙인, "정절의 역사" 푸른역사 2014

    19 이강옥, "일화의 형성 원리와 서술 미학" 보고사 2015

    20 류종영, "웃음의 미학" 유로 2007

    21 앙리 베르그송, "웃음 : 희극성의 의미에 관한 시론" 세계사 2001

    22 柳夢寅, "어우야담원문(於于野譚)" 돌베개 2006

    23 김남이, "성종대 공론장에서의 검열과 비판 : 치세 초반 儒生과 師表에 대한 논의를 중심으로" 한국한문학회 68 : 2017

    24 정출헌, "성종대 新進士類의 同類意識과 그 分化의 양상" 민족문학사학회·민족문학사연구소 50 : 2012

    25 김준형, "새 민족문학사 강좌01" 창비 2009

    26 王邦雄, "맹자철학" 서광사 2005

    27 지그문트 프로이트, "농담과 무의식의 관계" 열린책들 2004

    28 권연웅, "경연과 임금 길들이기" 지식산업사 2015

    29 李成茂, "韓國의 科擧制度" 集文堂 2000

    30 曺佐鎬, "韓國科擧制度史硏究" 범우사 1996

    31 崔在錫, "韓國家族制度史硏究" 一志社 1986

    32 丁淳睦, "韓國學基礎資料選集: 近世Ⅰ篇" 韓國精神文化硏究院 1994

    33 李 陸, "靑坡劇談" 探求堂 5 : 1969

    34 李 滉, "退溪集" 民族文化推進會 1988

    35 曺 伸, "謏聞瑣錄" 亞細亞文化社 1990

    36 成 俔, "虛白堂集" 民族文化推進會 1988

    37 안득용, "虛白堂 成俔의 政治思想 一考" 민족어문학회 88 : 2020

    38 최두헌, "筆記의 관점에서 본 『耳目口心書』 硏究" 고려대학교 2011

    39 徐居正, "筆苑雜記" 探求堂 5 : 1969

    40 이재충, "稗官雜記의 詩話 硏究" 영남대학교 2004

    41 宋香美, "稗官雜記 硏究" 성균관대학교 1994

    42 南孝溫, "秋江集" 民族文化推進會 1988

    43 李 穡, "牧隱藁" 民族文化推進會 1988

    44 曺 偉, "梅溪集" 民族文化推進會 1988

    45 姜 渾, "木溪逸稿" 民族文化推進會 1988

    46 徐居正, "朝鮮王朝實錄; 東文選"

    47 金泰永, "朝鮮性理學의 歷史像" 경희대학교 출판국 2006

    48 오세현, "文章, 조선을 경륜하다" 나녹 2018

    49 金致雨, "攷事撮要의 版種考" 한국비블리아학회 1 : 1972

    50 鄭景柱, "成宗朝 新進士類의 文學世界" 法仁文化社 1993

    51 成 俔, "慵齋叢話" 慶山大學校二十周年記念事業團學術行事委員會 ; 學民文化社 2000

    52 許 筠, "惺所覆瓿稿" 民族文化推進會 1988

    53 金正國, "思齋集" 民族文化推進會 1988

    54 金安老, "希樂堂稿" 民族文化推進會 1988

    55 金 鑢, "寒皐館外史(六)"

    56 魚叔權, "寒皐館外史(一)" 韓國精神文化硏究院 2002

    57 曺 伸, "寒皐觀外史(一)" 韓國精神文化硏究院 2002

    58 徐居正, "四佳集" 民族文化推進會 1988

    59 尹善道, "北行日記"

    60 程 頤, "二程集" 中華書局 2019

    61 鄭用健, "中宗代 官僚 文人의 학적 지향과 문학의식" 고려대학교 2020

    62 褚斌杰, "中國古代文體槪論" 北京大學出版社 2003

    63 Pope, Alexander, "The Correspondence of ALEXSANDER POPE VolumeⅠ:1704~1718" Oxford Univ. Press 1956

    64 C. Day Lewis, "Poetry For You" Basil Blackwell 1945

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼