예고등기의 존폐논의에 관한 소고 = A Legal thought on the maintenance or abolition of Preannounced registration

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Preannounced registration shall be filed by commission of court which has accepted a lawsuit in cases where a lawsuit for cancellation or restoration of registration due to nullity or revocation of grounds for registration has been instituted. However, this shall not apply to cases where such nullity or revocation cannot be set up against a third person acting in good faith. (Registration of Real Estate Act Article 4) The Preannounced registration is a preliminary registration in the way that it has no direct connection with the effect of alteration of a right. The Preannounced registration has the warning effect to third parties. However, the Preannounced registration has been abused for a drop in successful bid of auction for Real Estate. Hence, the Department of Justice made pre-announcement of legislation for the repeal of the Preannounced registration which in the whole amendment to Korean Real Estate Act in November 9th, 2009 because abuses of the Preannounced registration such as disadvantages of registered person on the transactions by the Preannounced registration or the Preannounced registration by the litigation for obstruction of the performance are serious and the practical function of the Preannounced registration has lost at the present time. There are several particulars which should be considered about this amendment. In other words, consideration by composition of change in a real right to return and problem of similar application of `Fictitious Declaration of Intention in Collusion` are existed in juridical; consideration about relationship with repeal of provisional registration and disposition is also needed in a legal system. Likewise, the problem of national cost-bearing would become an object of concern realistically. When these aspects are considered, the comparison between the abuse of the notice registration as practical problem and the relationship with other systems by the repeal and the national necessity is needed for the problem of the notice registration.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 今上益雄, "不動産登記法" 東京大學出版會 2004

2 幾代通, "不動産登記法" 有斐閣 1983

3 김병두, "예고등기의 효력" 14 (14): 2006

4 김대환, "예고등기의 효력" 44 : 1988

5 "예고등기의 존폐논의에 관한 소고"

6 서상철, "예고등기에 관한 소고" 18 : 2007

7 곽윤직, "예고등기에 관하여" 22 (22): 1981

8 법원행정처, "부동산등기실무〔Ⅱ〕" 법원행정처 2007

9 법제사법위원회, "부동산등기법 중 개정법률안 심사보고서" 1991

10 대한변호사협회, "부동산등기법 전부개정법률(안)에 대한 의견" 2009

11 최명구, "부동산등기법" 동방문화사 2009

12 신현기, "부동산등기법" 법률서원 2004

13 곽윤직, "부동산등기법" 박영사 2001

14 법원행정처, "법원실무제요(민사)" 법원행정처 1996

15 김황식, "등기제도 개선 일반론" 9 : 1988

16 松尾, "物権変動における「対抗の法理」と「無権利の法理」の間(1)" 慶應義塾大学大学院法務研究科 6 : 2006

17 內田, "民法Ⅰ" 東京大學出版會 2001

18 七戸 克彦, "予告登記の廃止" 金融財政事情研究会 43 (43): 2003

19 "予告登記 沿革"

20 佐藤　勇, "不動産登記法　新版" 住宅新報社 2007

21 "http://www.moj.go.jp/PUBLIC/MINJI34/refer02.html"

22 "http://www.lawtimes.co.kr/LawNews/News/NewsContents.aspx?kind=&serial=49760"

23 "http://www.lawtimes.co.kr/LawNews/News/NewsContents.aspx?kind=&serial=43231"

24 법원공무원교육원, "2010 부동산등기실무" 법원공무원교육원 2010