RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘포스트-고전서사학’의 전망과 현재 -- 타자로서의 시간과 공간 = A Transition towards the Post-Classical Narratology - Space and Time as the Other

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106599567

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since Russian Formalists posited a fiction as form and initiated us to experience time in its displaced order, the two terms of fabula and sjuzet became the foundation on which the narrative studies built up, and those terms had been transformed into story and narrative by Genette, or story and discourse by Chatman. Nevertheless, the privileged narratology during the twenty century mainly relied on the French Structuralism along with British and American narrative theories, for without mentioning the names of Todorov and Genette, and of Wayne Booth and Dorrit Cohn, hardly can we compose anything about narrative. Not only the transition from the structuralists' universalism to the post-structuralists' narrative discourse, but even such various terms including free indirect speech, implied author, and focalization are the reservoir obtained by one centuries' investigation. For all these, do we need more studies with narratology? This paper probes the narrative theory after the classical period so called post-classical narratology designated by certain new scholars like David Harman and James Phelan. The general characteristics of new paradigm could be summarized as not an age of theories, nor of political corrections, but of reading materials exhaustively for the discipline of our mind. Cultivating the ethics, we are to be confronted by the broad areas of narrative analysis not to mention of literary field: film, music, history, media, law, medicine, and so on. While surveying and featuring the aspects of new method, this paper examines the interaction of space and time as one trend among others emerged in this theory-practice age.
      번역하기

      Since Russian Formalists posited a fiction as form and initiated us to experience time in its displaced order, the two terms of fabula and sjuzet became the foundation on which the narrative studies built up, and those terms had been transformed into ...

      Since Russian Formalists posited a fiction as form and initiated us to experience time in its displaced order, the two terms of fabula and sjuzet became the foundation on which the narrative studies built up, and those terms had been transformed into story and narrative by Genette, or story and discourse by Chatman. Nevertheless, the privileged narratology during the twenty century mainly relied on the French Structuralism along with British and American narrative theories, for without mentioning the names of Todorov and Genette, and of Wayne Booth and Dorrit Cohn, hardly can we compose anything about narrative. Not only the transition from the structuralists' universalism to the post-structuralists' narrative discourse, but even such various terms including free indirect speech, implied author, and focalization are the reservoir obtained by one centuries' investigation. For all these, do we need more studies with narratology? This paper probes the narrative theory after the classical period so called post-classical narratology designated by certain new scholars like David Harman and James Phelan. The general characteristics of new paradigm could be summarized as not an age of theories, nor of political corrections, but of reading materials exhaustively for the discipline of our mind. Cultivating the ethics, we are to be confronted by the broad areas of narrative analysis not to mention of literary field: film, music, history, media, law, medicine, and so on. While surveying and featuring the aspects of new method, this paper examines the interaction of space and time as one trend among others emerged in this theory-practice age.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권택영, "카니발의 의미: 바흐친과 문학의 사회성, 후기 구조주의 문학이론" 민음사 67-85, 1990

      2 Palmer, Alan, "The Construction of Fictional Minds" Narrative 10.1 28-46, 2002

      3 Friedman, Susan Stanford, "Spatial Poetics and Arundhati Ray's The God of Small Good Things" A Companion to Narrative Theory 192-203,

      4 Mitchell, W. T. T., "Medium Theory: Preface to the 2003 Critical Inquiry쟔ymposium." Critical Inquiry 325-483, 2004

      5 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, "Eye and Mind, The Primacy of Perception" Evanston:쟍orthwestern UP 1964

      6 Phelan, James, "Estranging Unreliability, Bonding Unreliability, and the Ethics of?Lolita" Narrative 15.2 222-238, 2007

      1 권택영, "카니발의 의미: 바흐친과 문학의 사회성, 후기 구조주의 문학이론" 민음사 67-85, 1990

      2 Palmer, Alan, "The Construction of Fictional Minds" Narrative 10.1 28-46, 2002

      3 Friedman, Susan Stanford, "Spatial Poetics and Arundhati Ray's The God of Small Good Things" A Companion to Narrative Theory 192-203,

      4 Mitchell, W. T. T., "Medium Theory: Preface to the 2003 Critical Inquiry쟔ymposium." Critical Inquiry 325-483, 2004

      5 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, "Eye and Mind, The Primacy of Perception" Evanston:쟍orthwestern UP 1964

      6 Phelan, James, "Estranging Unreliability, Bonding Unreliability, and the Ethics of?Lolita" Narrative 15.2 222-238, 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.68 0.68 0.69
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.68 1.285 0.21
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼