In this paper, we analyzed and considered the similarity and difference between Japanese noun sentences and verb sentences, focusing on “Prefix O + Conjunctive Noun + Auxiliary Verb” (hereinafter “O-Noun Sentence”). Despite the fact that the ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106494253
채성식 (고려대학교)
2019
Korean
名詞文 ; 動詞文 ; 転成名詞 ; 名詞化 ; 連用形名詞 ; noun sentences ; verb sentences ; derivative nouns ; nominzalization ; infinitive-derived nouns
KCI등재
학술저널
131-149(19쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In this paper, we analyzed and considered the similarity and difference between Japanese noun sentences and verb sentences, focusing on “Prefix O + Conjunctive Noun + Auxiliary Verb” (hereinafter “O-Noun Sentence”). Despite the fact that the ...
In this paper, we analyzed and considered the similarity and difference between Japanese noun sentences and verb sentences, focusing on “Prefix O + Conjunctive Noun + Auxiliary Verb” (hereinafter “O-Noun Sentence”). Despite the fact that the syntactic form of the same type is often used in the real life as a concise honorific expression, it has surprisingly not received much attention in existing studies related to honorifics. However, among the few studies, Shinya (2003, 2014) picked up “O-da” corresponding to the same form as a typical example of Japanese noun orientation and noun-centered syntax, and compared it with other honorific expressions. Through analysis, she approached its morphological and syntactic features.
However, Shinya’s analysis was aimed at the combination of the prefix ‘o’ and the conjugation ‘da’ that constitutes the same form, so analysis and consideration on the verb conjunctive form, which is another component, is not enough. Therefore, in this paper, we newly define the verb conjunctive form appearing in “O-Noun sentences” as “conjunctive nouns”, and then examine the grammatical behavior in the same form, including the validity of combining with prefixes.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 益岡隆志, "「内」と「外」の言語学" 開拓社 2009
2 西山佑司, "「NP1のNP2」と“NP2 of NP1”" 明治書院 10 (10): 65-71, 1993
3 八木健太郎, "連用形名詞の「結果状態解釈」に対する換喩分析" 38 : 95-115, 2014
4 国広哲弥, "連用形名詞の新用法は異常か" 大修館書店 39 (39): 74-77, 2002
5 沈晨, "日本語連用形名詞の自立性の段階について" 国語国立研究所 151-158, 2013
6 新屋映子, "日本語の名詞指向性の研究" ひつじ書房 2014
7 채성식, "日本語の動詞連用形名詞に関する一考察 -「名詞としての自立性(独立性)」の観点から-" 동아시아일본학회 (36) : 487-509, 2010
8 채성식, "日本語 名詞表現을 통해 본 名詞의 動詞性 -<動詞的名詞>와 <連用形名詞>를 中心으로-" 글로벌일본연구원 (13) : 291-310, 2010
9 新屋映子, "形容詞派生の名詞「~さ」を述語とする文の性質" 日本語学会 2 (2): 33-46, 2006
10 谷口秀治, "大分大学留学生センター紀要" 57-66, 2006
1 益岡隆志, "「内」と「外」の言語学" 開拓社 2009
2 西山佑司, "「NP1のNP2」と“NP2 of NP1”" 明治書院 10 (10): 65-71, 1993
3 八木健太郎, "連用形名詞の「結果状態解釈」に対する換喩分析" 38 : 95-115, 2014
4 国広哲弥, "連用形名詞の新用法は異常か" 大修館書店 39 (39): 74-77, 2002
5 沈晨, "日本語連用形名詞の自立性の段階について" 国語国立研究所 151-158, 2013
6 新屋映子, "日本語の名詞指向性の研究" ひつじ書房 2014
7 채성식, "日本語の動詞連用形名詞に関する一考察 -「名詞としての自立性(独立性)」の観点から-" 동아시아일본학회 (36) : 487-509, 2010
8 채성식, "日本語 名詞表現을 통해 본 名詞의 動詞性 -<動詞的名詞>와 <連用形名詞>를 中心으로-" 글로벌일본연구원 (13) : 291-310, 2010
9 新屋映子, "形容詞派生の名詞「~さ」を述語とする文の性質" 日本語学会 2 (2): 33-46, 2006
10 谷口秀治, "大分大学留学生センター紀要" 57-66, 2006
11 三喜田光次, "外国語教育" 天理大学言語教育研究センター 19-40, 2004
12 西山佑司, "名詞句研究の現状と展望" 明治書院 29 (29): 4-14, 2010
13 西尾寅弥, "動詞連用形の名詞化に関する一考察" 明治書院 60-81, 1961
14 高橋勝忠, "動詞連用形の名詞化とサ変動詞「する」の関係" 10 : 15-33, 2011
15 影山太郎, "動詞の文法から名詞の文法へ" 明治書院 29 (29): 16-23, 2010
16 岡村正章, "上智大学国文学論集" 上智大学 73-89, 1995
17 채성식, "<名詞>に潜在する<動詞性>について -<動詞的名詞>を含む連体修飾表現を中心に-" 한국일본어문학회 1 (1): 209-233, 2009
한・일 양국 TV 시사토론프로그램에 나타나는 커뮤니케이션 양상
한국의 일본어문법교재에 나타나는 「わけだ」의 교육에 관하여
マンガというコンテンツとその翻訳 -あさきゆめみしの韓国語訳を中心に-
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2028 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2022-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2007-01-19 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 일본언어문화학회 -> 한국일본언어문화학회영문명 : 미등록 -> Japanese Language & Culture Association of Korea | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.28 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.26 | 0.25 | 0.547 | 0.03 |