RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국어 교육을 위한 '이다' 의미의 인지언어학적 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15059709

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study deals with the copula i-da(이다) which has various meanings. So this borrowed the prototype theory of cognitive linguistics for finding the most fundamental sense and elicited various meanings expanded radially. After that, this went through a course of text analysis, learner error corpus analysis, questionnaire survey and suggested an educational arrangement about it. All of these processes were for finding how to teach the copula i-da(이다) effectively.

      I-da(이다) penetrates a wide range from beginner to advanced. So it is extensively utilized in the real life and is often used in actual discourse situations, including textbooks. However, learners constantly make mistakes in relation to it from beginner’s to advanced level, because it is concentrated only on beginner’s level and presented as a syntax type in current Korean textbooks. This method makes learners perceive ‘one’ i-da(이다) as ‘another’. So learners are hard to comprehensively understand i-da(이다) with various meanings.
      Therefore, in contrast to the Korean academic field which focuses on the grammar category setting of i-da(이다), this study has focused on finding various meanings, searching for the prototype. Research on i-da(이다) has mainly focused on morphological viewpoints and syntactic activities so far, but this study deals with it at the semantic level.
      Learners first learn the most fundamental meaning of prototype. And the meaning of the prototype establishes the polysemy through conceptual metaphor, conceptual metonymy and conceptual blending. Through this extension mechanism, the radiation category of meanings of i-da(이다) is expanded step by step, from identification to class membership, existence, location, possession, quantification, ascription, psychology, repetition, state, time, presentation, emphasis and relatedness.
      In order to find out if the education by meaning classification is done, it is necessary to investigate the situation in actual education field. Consequently this study dealt with text analysis, learner error corpus analysis, questionnaire survey. Through these analysis of errors caused by learners, this study judged that learners did not correctly recognize the meaning of i-da(이다), and accordingly proposed a method and an educational arrangement which effectively suggests the various meanings of it to Korean learners.
      If Korean learners understand the polysemy of i-da(이다) and the customary way of expanding meanings in depth, they can apply various types of it in the actual discourse situation and it will lead to the enhancement of communication ability.

      Finally, this study could be a valuable resource as a study on i-da(이다) and cognitive linguistics.
      번역하기

      This study deals with the copula i-da(이다) which has various meanings. So this borrowed the prototype theory of cognitive linguistics for finding the most fundamental sense and elicited various meanings expanded radially. After that, this went thr...

      This study deals with the copula i-da(이다) which has various meanings. So this borrowed the prototype theory of cognitive linguistics for finding the most fundamental sense and elicited various meanings expanded radially. After that, this went through a course of text analysis, learner error corpus analysis, questionnaire survey and suggested an educational arrangement about it. All of these processes were for finding how to teach the copula i-da(이다) effectively.

      I-da(이다) penetrates a wide range from beginner to advanced. So it is extensively utilized in the real life and is often used in actual discourse situations, including textbooks. However, learners constantly make mistakes in relation to it from beginner’s to advanced level, because it is concentrated only on beginner’s level and presented as a syntax type in current Korean textbooks. This method makes learners perceive ‘one’ i-da(이다) as ‘another’. So learners are hard to comprehensively understand i-da(이다) with various meanings.
      Therefore, in contrast to the Korean academic field which focuses on the grammar category setting of i-da(이다), this study has focused on finding various meanings, searching for the prototype. Research on i-da(이다) has mainly focused on morphological viewpoints and syntactic activities so far, but this study deals with it at the semantic level.
      Learners first learn the most fundamental meaning of prototype. And the meaning of the prototype establishes the polysemy through conceptual metaphor, conceptual metonymy and conceptual blending. Through this extension mechanism, the radiation category of meanings of i-da(이다) is expanded step by step, from identification to class membership, existence, location, possession, quantification, ascription, psychology, repetition, state, time, presentation, emphasis and relatedness.
      In order to find out if the education by meaning classification is done, it is necessary to investigate the situation in actual education field. Consequently this study dealt with text analysis, learner error corpus analysis, questionnaire survey. Through these analysis of errors caused by learners, this study judged that learners did not correctly recognize the meaning of i-da(이다), and accordingly proposed a method and an educational arrangement which effectively suggests the various meanings of it to Korean learners.
      If Korean learners understand the polysemy of i-da(이다) and the customary way of expanding meanings in depth, they can apply various types of it in the actual discourse situation and it will lead to the enhancement of communication ability.

      Finally, this study could be a valuable resource as a study on i-da(이다) and cognitive linguistics.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론 1
      • 1.1. 연구 목적 1
      • 1.2. 선행 연구 2
      • 1.3. 연구 방법 5
      • 2. 이론적 배경 7
      • 1. 서론 1
      • 1.1. 연구 목적 1
      • 1.2. 선행 연구 2
      • 1.3. 연구 방법 5
      • 2. 이론적 배경 7
      • 2.1. 원형 이론 7
      • 2.2. 방사 범주 10
      • 2.3. 의미 확장 메커니즘 14
      • 2.4. 원칙적 다의성 접근법 18
      • 3. ‘이다’의 의미 분석 21
      • 3.1. ‘이다’의 형태적 분류 21
      • 3.2. ‘이다’의 의미 구분 30
      • 3.3. ‘이다’ 의미의 재설정 37
      • 4. 한국어 교육에서의 ‘이다’ 47
      • 4.1. 사전과 문법서에서의 ‘이다’ 47
      • 4.2. 교재에서의 ‘이다’ 57
      • 4.3. 한국어 학습자의 ‘이다’ 오류 유형 69
      • 5. 한국어 교육을 위한 ‘이다’ 의미의 제시 87
      • 5.1. ‘이다’ 의미 제시 방법 87
      • 5.2. ‘이다’ 의미 교육 배열 92
      • 6. 결론 98
      • 참고 문헌 102
      • ABSTRACT 114
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼