RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      극대화 성향, 자기해석, 자기-타인이 제품선호에 미치는 영향 = The influence of maximization, self-construal, and self-other on consumer’s product preference

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106888329

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to investigate whether maximization and self-construal influences consumer’s product preference in self and other decision making. The experimental design of this study was 2(maximization: maximizers/satisficers)×2(sel...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate whether maximization and self-construal influences consumer’s product preference in self and other decision making. The experimental design of this study was 2(maximization: maximizers/satisficers)×2(self-construal: independent/interdependent)×{2(target: self/other)} 3-way mixed design. Target was a within-subjects variable. The results revealed that the effect of three-way interaction was significant and supported two hypotheses. First, it was demonstrated that maximizers maximize for both themselves and others regardless of self-construal subtypes. Interdependent satisficers on the other hand, maximize only for others and not for themselves much more significantly than independent satisficers. Additionally, the effect of two-way interaction revealed that there were significant differences between maximization and self-other, and between self-construal and self-other. More specifically, the results indicated that maximizers and satisficers made different choice in making decisions for themselves. There were also differences between independent and interdependent subjects when making decisions for themselves. Interdependent subjects also showed significant difference in self and other decision making.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      본 연구는 자기 또는 타인을 위한 결정에서 극대화성향과 자기해석이 제품선호에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 실험설계는 2(극대화성향: 극대/만족) × 2(자기해석: 독립/상호의존) × {2(자기/�...

      본 연구는 자기 또는 타인을 위한 결정에서 극대화성향과 자기해석이 제품선호에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 실험설계는 2(극대화성향: 극대/만족) × 2(자기해석: 독립/상호의존) × {2(자기/타인)}의 삼원 혼합설계이었다. 연구결과, 첫째, 극대화성향, 자기해석, 자기-타인의 삼원상호작용이 유의하였다. 즉 극대자는 자기해석 유형과 상관없이 자기를 위한 결정이든 타인을 위한 결정이든 극대화옵션을 선호하였고, 만족자가 독립적 자기해석자일 때보다 상호의존적 자기해석자일 때 자기보다 타인의 경우에 극대화옵션을 선호하였다. 둘째, 극대화성향과 자기-타인의 이원상호작용 그리고 자기해석과 자기-타인의 이원상호작용이 유의하였다. 만족자는 자기를 위한 경우 만족옵션을, 타인을 위한 경우 극대화옵션을 선호하였고, 극대자는 자기-타인에 상관없이 극대화옵션을 선호하였다. 또한 상호의존적 자기해석자는 자기보다 타인을 위할 때 극대화옵션을 선호하였고, 독립적 자기해석자는 자기-타인 간에 차이가 없었다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양윤, "자기해석, 초점정서, 광고 내 맥락이 금연 공익광고 태도에 미치는 영향" 한국광고학회 21 (21): 245-270, 2010

      2 김화민, "자기 또는 타인을 위한 구매 결정상황에서 자기해석과 해석수준이 위험감수 정도에 미치는 영향" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 18 (18): 97-115, 2017

      3 양윤, "극대화 성향, 대안 수, 사고 유형이 소비자의 결정 어려움에 미치는 영향" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 20 (20): 297-317, 2019

      4 Baskin, E., "Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers : A construal-level approach to gift giving" 41 (41): 169-182, 2014

      5 Polman, E., "Why are maximizers less happy than satisficers? Because they maximize positive and negative outcomes" 23 (23): 179-190, 2010

      6 Ariely, D., "When do losses loom larger than gains?" 42 (42): 134-138, 2005

      7 Iyengar, S. S., "When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?" 79 (79): 995-1006, 2000

      8 Petrova, D., "What Factors Moderate Self-Other Discrepancies in Decision Making? Results from a Vaccination Scenario" 19 : 1-11, 2016

      9 Kim, K., "Vulnerable maximizers : The role of decision difficulty" 12 (12): 516-526, 2017

      10 Dalal, D. K., "Understanding the construct of maximizing tendency : A theoretical and empirical evaluation" 28 (28): 437-450, 2015

      1 양윤, "자기해석, 초점정서, 광고 내 맥락이 금연 공익광고 태도에 미치는 영향" 한국광고학회 21 (21): 245-270, 2010

      2 김화민, "자기 또는 타인을 위한 구매 결정상황에서 자기해석과 해석수준이 위험감수 정도에 미치는 영향" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 18 (18): 97-115, 2017

      3 양윤, "극대화 성향, 대안 수, 사고 유형이 소비자의 결정 어려움에 미치는 영향" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 20 (20): 297-317, 2019

      4 Baskin, E., "Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers : A construal-level approach to gift giving" 41 (41): 169-182, 2014

      5 Polman, E., "Why are maximizers less happy than satisficers? Because they maximize positive and negative outcomes" 23 (23): 179-190, 2010

      6 Ariely, D., "When do losses loom larger than gains?" 42 (42): 134-138, 2005

      7 Iyengar, S. S., "When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?" 79 (79): 995-1006, 2000

      8 Petrova, D., "What Factors Moderate Self-Other Discrepancies in Decision Making? Results from a Vaccination Scenario" 19 : 1-11, 2016

      9 Kim, K., "Vulnerable maximizers : The role of decision difficulty" 12 (12): 516-526, 2017

      10 Dalal, D. K., "Understanding the construct of maximizing tendency : A theoretical and empirical evaluation" 28 (28): 437-450, 2015

      11 Cross, S. E., "Thinking about oneself and others : The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition" 82 (82): 399-418, 2002

      12 Cross, S. E., "The what, how, why, and where of self-construal" 15 (15): 142-179, 2011

      13 Howard, E. S., "The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders : Self-construal in intergroup versus dyadic dispute resolution negotiations" 93 (93): 614-, 2007

      14 Weaver, K., "The role of social comparison for maximizers and satisficers : Wanting the best or wanting to be the best?" 25 (25): 372-388, 2015

      15 Cross, S. E., "The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships" 78 (78): 791-808, 2000

      16 Singelis, T. M., "The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals" 20 (20): 580-591, 1994

      17 Turner, B. M., "The maximization inventory" 7 (7): 48-60, 2012

      18 Nayakankuppam, D., "The endowment effect : Rose-tinted and dark-tinted glasses" 32 (32): 390-395, 2005

      19 Beckstein, A., "The Relationship between Decision-Making Style and Self-Construal and the Subjective Happiness of Native Americans" 2015

      20 Cheng, R. W. Y., "Self‐construal and social comparison effects" 77 (77): 197-211, 2007

      21 Lin, Z., "Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception" 77 (77): 93-97, 2008

      22 Utz, S., "Self-construal and cooperation : Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self?" 3 (3): 177-190, 2004

      23 Iyengar, S. S., "Rethinking the value of choice : a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation" 76 (76): 349-366, 1999

      24 Pöhlmann, C., "Repercussions of self-construal for self-relevant and other-relevant choice" 25 (25): 284-305, 2007

      25 Simon, H. A., "Rational choice and the structure of the environment" 63 (63): 129-138, 1956

      26 Duclos, R., "Prosocial behavior in intergroup relations : How donor self-construal and recipient group-membership shape generosity" 41 (41): 93-108, 2014

      27 Zhang, Z., "Price discrepancy between sellers and buyers when making decisions for the self and others" 118 (118): 889-901, 2016

      28 Cheek, N. N., "On the meaning and measurement of maximization" 11 (11): 126-146, 2016

      29 Reibstein, D. J., "Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior" 60 (60): 434-437, 1975

      30 Lee, H., "Motivated search : Effects of choice accountability, issue involvement, and prior knowledge on information acquisition and use" 45 (45): 75-88, 1999

      31 Liu, Z., "Mental accounting in decision-making for self versus others" 10 (10): 81-94, 2017

      32 Lai, L., "Maximizing without difficulty : A modified maximizing scale and its correlates" 5 (5): 164-175, 2010

      33 Schwartz, B., "Maximizing versus satisficing : Happiness is a matter of choice" 83 (83): 1178-1197, 2002

      34 Shiner, R. L., "Maximizers, satisficers, and their satisfaction with and preferences for reversible versus irreversible decisions" 6 (6): 896-903, 2015

      35 Parker, A. M., "Maximizers versus satisficers : Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes" 2 (2): 342-350, 2007

      36 Luan, M., "Maximization paradox : result of believing in an objective best" 43 (43): 652-661, 2017

      37 Jonas, E., "Information search and presentation in advisor-client interactions" 91 (91): 154-168, 2003

      38 Brannon, D. C., "If it has lots of bells and whistles, it must be the best : how maximizers and satisficers evaluate feature-rich versus feature-poor products" 28 (28): 651-662, 2017

      39 Luan, M., "Good enough-compromise between desirability and feasibility : an alternative perspective on satisficing" 70 : 110-116, 2017

      40 Polman, E., "Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload" 102 (102): 980-993, 2012

      41 Luan, M., "Do maximizers maximize for others? Self-other decision-making differences in maximizing and satisficing" 121 : 52-56, 2018

      42 Lu, J., "Desirability or feasibility : Self-other decision-making differences" 39 (39): 144-155, 2013

      43 Polman, E., "Decision fatigue, choosing for others, and self-construal" 7 (7): 471-478, 2016

      44 White, K., "Culture, self-construal, and affective reactions to successful and unsuccessful others" 42 (42): 582-592, 2006

      45 Church, A. T., "Culture, cross-role consistency, and adjustment : testing trait and cultural psychology perspectives" 95 (95): 739-755, 2008

      46 Markus, H. R., "Culture and the self : Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation" 98 (98): 224-253, 1991

      47 Oyserman, D., "Cultural accommodation : Hybridity and the framing of social obligation" 74 (74): 1606-1618, 1998

      48 Kray, L. J., "Contingent weighting in self-other decision making" 83 (83): 82-106, 2000

      49 Gore, J. S., "Conflicts of interest : Relational self-construal and decision making in interpersonal contexts" 10 (10): 185-202, 2011

      50 Liu, Y., "Choosing for others and its relation to information search" 147 : 65-75, 2018

      51 Highhouse, S. E., "Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency" 3 (3): 364-370, 2008

      52 Nenkov, G., "A short form of the Maximization Scale : Factor structure, reliability and validity studies" 3 (3): 371-388, 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국심리학회지: 소비자/광고 -> 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.23 1.23 1.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.28 1.35 2.111 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼