사실혼 보호 법리의 재검토 = Reexamination of protection legal principles of De facto Marriage

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although de facto marriage has the figure of marriage it can’t be protected as same as registered marriage unless they are registered, thus it’s still a subject of argument in terms of its legal protection. Especially in case of withdrew of de facto marriage, what can be the issue is the matter regarding properties vested to government from party of de facto marriage. In case of contract of lifetime annulment in terms of registered marriage, it can be done through property partition, in case of contract of death because annulment, settlement will proceed through spouse’s inheritance. But there are no clear regulations on this for case of contract of annulment of de facto marriage. Yet the supreme court admit property partition claim for divorce as registered marriage in case of contract of lifetime annulment of de facto marriage, but in case of contract of death cause annulment, they don’t admit both property division claim and inheritance to the surviving de facto marriage spouse. But toward property that was made by mutual effort between de facto marriage spouses, allowing settlement only in case of contract of lifetime annulment means it’s losing its balance for protection level toward surviving de facto marriage spouse. Therefore in this essay, in viewpoint of settlement and maintaining of property that was made by participation of parties related to de facto marriage, we examined about few matters for protection of parties related to de facto marriage.
First, we took a look at condition of de facto marriage and recognition got its protection in Korea for examination of its necessity, and then we stressed about the importance of protection of de facto marriage spouse. We examined it by dividing applicable protective legal principles into contract of lifetime annulment and contract of death cause annulment through distinguish necessity and typology which need protection. But instead of suggesting certain detailed plan or a new legislation regarding protection of de facto marriage, it stopped as examining it based on opinions that were discussed and simply appealing personal opinions.
In order to protect de facto marriage, problem solving plan related to family law system should be sought. Especially in case of existing law consider for property division claim and dual structure of inheritance that are selected as protection plan for legal marriage spouse, it’s regarded as that the opinion of give inheritance could be more proper in terms of legislation. Hereafter, related to status of de facto marriage that are occurring variously in Korea, we wish more detailed discussion would be conducted for it’s protective plan.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김상준, "혼외가족의 법률문제, In 민사판례연구 제18집" 1996

2 배경희, "친족상속법강의" 제일법규 2006

3 박동섭, "친족상속법" 박영사 2009

4 김주수, "친족상속법" 법문사 2008

5 양수산, "친족상속법" 일신사 1994

6 김시철, "일방 당사자의 사망으로 인하여 사실혼관계가 종료된 경우 그 상대방에게 재산분할청구권을 인정할 수 있는지, In 대법원판례해설 제61호" 2006

7 정광현, "신친족상속법요론" 법문사 1962

8 권순한, "상속법의 미래의 과제" 한국가족법학회 (14) : 2000

9 곽윤직, "상속법" 박영사 2004

10 한국가정법률상담소, "사실혼의 실태 및 의식에 관한 조사" 2007

11 박종용, "사실혼배우자의 보호―특히 사망으로 인한 혼인해소의 경우를 중심으로―" 한국가족법학회 21 (21): 139-160, 2007

12 손승온, "사실혼관계 해소와 관련한 문제점, In 가정법원사건의 제문제"

13 장창민, "사실혼과 혼외동거에 관한 일고:재산상 보호를 중심으로" 한국가족법학회 17 (17): 2-86, 2003

14 고창현, "사실혼과 부의 법적지위" 4 : 1981

15 김상용, "사실혼 배우자의 상속권에 관한 시론(試論)" 중앙법학회 9 (9): 511-546, 2007

16 이재강, "사실혼 배우자의 법적 지위" 1998

17 차선자, "사실혼 배우자에 대한 상속 가능성, In 변화하는 사회와 사실혼의 법적보호" 가정법률상담소 2007

18 이경희, "가족법" 법원사 2008

19 박인환, "死亡에 의한 事實婚의 解消와 財産分割의 類推" 한국가족법학회 21 (21): 161-206, 2007

20 島律一郞, "家族法入門" 有斐閣 1973

21 中川善之助, "內緣の法律的意義" 50 (50): 1935

22 仁平正夫, "內緣の夫婦の一方が死亡した場合の財産分與請求權" 37 (37):

23 지원림, "事實婚에 관한 약간의 비판적 고찰" 한국가족법학회 22 (22): 461-494, 2008

24 윤진수, "事實婚配偶者 一方이 사망한 경우의 財産問題" 한국법학원 (100) : 5-39, 2007

25 박인환, "事實婚保護法理의 變遷과 課題 ―事實婚의 發生類型과 保護의 個別化―" 한국가족법학회 23 (23): 133-186, 2009

26 Lenore J. Weitzman, "The Marriage Contract; Spouses, Lovers, And the Law" The Free Press 1981

27 Huet-Weiller, "Guide de l’Union Libre" 29 (29): 1981

28 법원행정처, "2008 사법연감"

29 한국가정법률상담소, "2007년도 상담통계"

30 한국가정법률상담소, "2006년도 상담통계"

31 한국가정법률상담소, "2005년도 상담통계"