RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      주장훈련과 가치명료화훈련이 간호사의 갈등정도와 갈등관리 양식에 미치는 효과 = The Effects of Assertiveness Traning and Value Clarification Training on Nurse's Conflict and Conflict Management Mode

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2021554

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of assertiveness training and value clarification on nurse's conflict and conflict management mode. Fifty seven registered nurses participated in the study; they were employed by three general hospital located in Daegu, Korea.
      The study employs two treatment groups. The assertiveness training group consisted of subjects who participated in 90-120 minutes sessions of assertiveness training nine times over five weeks. The other treatment group, was adiministed nine, 90-120 minutes sessions of value clarification during the same period. For the control group, nursing subjects were appointed the training after five weeks. Pre-test evaluation were administered to all subjects in three groups prior to one week of the treatment. Role conflict Inventory-general(RCI-G) and Communication Conflict Inventory-general(CCI-G)
      measure nurse's conflict management mode. Post-test evaluation were administered to all subjects in three groups two weeks after the last session by Role Conflict Inventory-Specific(RCI-S), Communication Conflict Inventory-Specific(CCI-S), Management Model-Specific(CMMI-S).
      The analysis of variance(ANOVA) on gain scores were running the SPSS program. In order to test statistical differences among mean scores of the scales obtained after treatment, multiple comparisons were carried out by Turkey method.
      Conclusions obtained from the results are as follows.
      1. The assertiveness training and the value clarification training were more effective in decreasing the nurse's role conflict. The value clarification was more effective than the assertiveness training in decreasing the assertiveness training in decreasing the nurse's role conflict.
      2. Both assertiveness training and the value clarification training were effective in decreasing nurse's communication conflict. There was, however, no differences between assertiveness training and value clarification training in decreasing the nurse's communication conflict.
      3. The assertiveness training and the value clarification training were quite effective in compromizing and collaborating conflict management mode, to reducing the withdrawl and accomodate, force and accomodate conflict management mode to conflict. There was no difference in the effectiveness of assertiveness training and value clarification.
      In assessing the effects of the treatments, this study employed different measurements.
      It is unclear whether the measurement affected the test results. It is worth conducting a further test using the same measurements. The results of future studies can be compared with those of this study.
      The homogeneity of the control group and treatment group is questionable. Further studies may employ homogeneous sample group to evaluate whether the sample characteristics bias the test results.
      Assertiveness training or value clarification training for nurses can be utilized in nursing intervention.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of assertiveness training and value clarification on nurse's conflict and conflict management mode. Fifty seven registered nurses participated in the study; they were employed by three general hospit...

      The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of assertiveness training and value clarification on nurse's conflict and conflict management mode. Fifty seven registered nurses participated in the study; they were employed by three general hospital located in Daegu, Korea.
      The study employs two treatment groups. The assertiveness training group consisted of subjects who participated in 90-120 minutes sessions of assertiveness training nine times over five weeks. The other treatment group, was adiministed nine, 90-120 minutes sessions of value clarification during the same period. For the control group, nursing subjects were appointed the training after five weeks. Pre-test evaluation were administered to all subjects in three groups prior to one week of the treatment. Role conflict Inventory-general(RCI-G) and Communication Conflict Inventory-general(CCI-G)
      measure nurse's conflict management mode. Post-test evaluation were administered to all subjects in three groups two weeks after the last session by Role Conflict Inventory-Specific(RCI-S), Communication Conflict Inventory-Specific(CCI-S), Management Model-Specific(CMMI-S).
      The analysis of variance(ANOVA) on gain scores were running the SPSS program. In order to test statistical differences among mean scores of the scales obtained after treatment, multiple comparisons were carried out by Turkey method.
      Conclusions obtained from the results are as follows.
      1. The assertiveness training and the value clarification training were more effective in decreasing the nurse's role conflict. The value clarification was more effective than the assertiveness training in decreasing the assertiveness training in decreasing the nurse's role conflict.
      2. Both assertiveness training and the value clarification training were effective in decreasing nurse's communication conflict. There was, however, no differences between assertiveness training and value clarification training in decreasing the nurse's communication conflict.
      3. The assertiveness training and the value clarification training were quite effective in compromizing and collaborating conflict management mode, to reducing the withdrawl and accomodate, force and accomodate conflict management mode to conflict. There was no difference in the effectiveness of assertiveness training and value clarification.
      In assessing the effects of the treatments, this study employed different measurements.
      It is unclear whether the measurement affected the test results. It is worth conducting a further test using the same measurements. The results of future studies can be compared with those of this study.
      The homogeneity of the control group and treatment group is questionable. Further studies may employ homogeneous sample group to evaluate whether the sample characteristics bias the test results.
      Assertiveness training or value clarification training for nurses can be utilized in nursing intervention.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼