Residential Development and Hierarchical Governance: Multifamily Housing and Multilevel Analysis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigates factors that influence multifamily housing zoning from a hierarchical governance perspective. Local zoning is a product of interactive processes among various stakeholders and of local politics. Since local zoning represents community interests in land development and has an exclusionary characteristic, multifamily housing zoning is controversial in some localities. We hypothesize that a hierarchical governance structure influences the supply of local multifamily housing zoning. The result of a hierarchical generalized linear model shows evidence that state smart growth reform and state intervention in local land use are positively associated with the establishment of local multifamily housing zoning. The decisions are also affected by local factors such as the supply of land, density restrictions, cost of new infrastructure, and city budget constraints. This study concludes that state authority and smart growth reform make it possible for local governments to commit to multifamily housing zoning to achieve housing affordability and high density development.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Fischel, W. A., "Zoning and land use regulation"

2 Ostrom, E., "Understanding institutional diversity" Princeton University Press 2005

3 유동상, "Understanding Local Politics and Affordable Housing : In terms of Political Market Theory" 한국지방행정연구원 24 (24): 423-448, 2010

4 Wardrip, K., "The role of affordable housing in creating jobs and stimulating local economic development: A review of the literature" Center for Housing Policy

5 Feiock, R. C., "The political economy of growth management" 22 (22): 208-220, 1994

6 Coase, R. H., "The nature of the firm" 4 : 386-405, 1937

7 Nelson, A. C., "The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence" Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy 2002

8 Carruthers, J. I., "The impacts of state growth management programmes?: A comparative analysis" 39 (39): 1959-1982, 2002

9 Burge, G., "The effects of impact fees on multifamily housing construction" 46 (46): 5-23, 2006

10 Mathur, S., "The effect of impact fees on the price of new single-family housing" 41 (41): 1303-1312, 2004

11 Evans-Cowley, J. S., "The effect of development impact fees on land values" 36 (36): 100-112, 2005

12 Bryson, J. M., "The design and implementation of cross-sector collaboration: Propositions from the literature" 66 : 44-55, 2006

13 Haughey, R. W., "The case for multifamily housing" Urban Land Institute 2003

14 박정원, "THE ADOPTION OF STATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT REGULATION (SGMR): REGARDING INSTITUTIONALANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT (IAD) FRAMEWORK AND EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS" 한국행정학회 15 (15): 43-58, 2010

15 McCabe, B. C., "State rules and city money" Lincoln Institute for Land Policy 2001

16 Bollens, S. A., "State growth management: Intergovernmental frameworks and policy objectives" 58 (58): 454-466, 1992

17 Tavares, A. F., "Political institutions and land use decisions: A multi-level analysis of city and county choices" 2008

18 Lubell, M., "Political institutions and conversation by local government" 40 (40): 706-729, 2005

19 Persson, T., "Political economics" MIT Press 2000

20 APA (American Planning Association), "Planning for smart growth: 2002 state of the states"

21 Park, S., "Participants in local zoning decision and multifamily housing: Transaction costs and hierarchical governance" 2012

22 Obrinsky, M., "Overcoming opposition to multifamily rental housing" National Multi Housing Council 2007

23 CPR (California Planning Roundtable), "Myths and facts about affordable and high density housing"

24 Miller, T. I., "Must growth restrictions eliminate moderate-priced housing?" 52 (52): 319-325, 1986

25 Williamson, O. E., "Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications" Free Press 1975

26 Geyskens, I., "Make, buy or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis" 49 (49): 519-543, 2006

27 Lawhon, L. L., "Local government use of development impact fees, In Municipal year book" International City/County Management Association 11-14, 2007

28 Chapman, J. I., "Land use planning and the local budget" 48 (48): 800-806, 1988

29 Turner, B. S., "Intergovernmental growth management: A partnership framework for state-local relations" 20 (20): 79-95, 1990

30 In-Sung Kang, "Implementation of Growth Management Policy in Florida Cities: Zoning Approval and Regulatory Policy Enforcement" 한국행정학회 11 (11): 85-98, 2006

31 Ostrom, E., "Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action" Cambridge University Press 1990

32 Weitz, J., "From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960-1999" 14 (14): 266-337, 1999

33 Anthony, J., "Do state growth management regulations reduce sprawl?" 39 (39): 376-397, 2004

34 Pendall, R., "Do land-use controls cause sprawl?" 26 (26): 555-571, 1999

35 McClure, K., "Deconcentrating poverty with housing programs" 74 (74): 90-99, 2008

36 Knapp, G., "De we know regulatory barriers when we see them? An exploration using zoning and development indicators" 18 (18): 711-749, 2007

37 Peterson, P. E., "City limits" University of Chicago Press 1981

38 Emerson, K., "An integrative framework for collaborative governance" 22 (22): 1-29, 2011

39 Fischel, W. A., "An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects"

40 Gyourko, J., "A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton residential land use regulatory index" 45 (45): 693-729, 2007

41 Howell-Moroney, M., "A mixed method look at state growth management policy" 38 (38): 339-361, 2007