RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      역사교육의전지구적전환: 새로운세계사와의연계 = The Global Turn in History Education - Connecting with New World History -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104461593

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      New World History began to emerge when historians failed to find solutions for the problems caused by the globalization, which widely spread across the world in the late 20st century and they tried to find alternative solutions for those problems. The global changes came to take place by the incidents of the German unification, the collapse of cold war followed by the fall of the Soviet Union, and in particular the September 11 attacks in the United States. These events made historians step further to seek a new world historical view.
      In this regard, the ideas regarding new world history started to be specified.
      We can see these changes from the following three cases. it con tains“ New world history”, “Global history”and “Big history”. First, the World History Association and the Journal of World History are the cases. Both of them were originally to establish the good status of the world history which was being globalized, Second, New Global History Initiative is another example. An intellectual group, which was established in 1989 and co-lead by Bruce Mazlish,a professor of MIT, and Wolf Schafer of Stony Brook University in New York,took a lead of this new field by publishing Conceptualizing Global History. Their work is specified through the course of‘ New Global History(2001)’taught by Bruce Mazlish and Akira Yiriye in Harvard University. Third example can be found in an effort to seek the concept of ‘a history of the whole universe,’which is more likely a general history. Maps of Time (2004) written by David Christian is an example of the effort.
      In the field of new world history which seeks the relationships and connectivity among groups based on the commonality of human beings, the concepts such as divergence, convergence, contagion, and systems are important and joint research are being promoted from multi-polar, pluralistic,and wide perspectives. The goal of the study is not to go back to the exclusive western supremacy of the modern history but to re-discover the enlightenment project, in other words, rationality of human actions. It is to make Humanocentric history not Eurocentric or Egocentric history. By this effort, it aims to transcend the traditional level of historical view, the developmental /improving historical view which is lineal, dualistic, and purposeful.
      This is to make new conceptualization of the Korean history possible in the context of new world history. Any researcher who is interested in making history globalized should first know that our historical experiences are closer to globality rather than modernity. In addition, he/she also needs to more focus on how to interpret the historical information rather than to collect the fundamental historical facts. With the information already given, it would be important for a researcher to infer, compare, seek relationships, find patterns, and interpret essential meanings of events of new world history. That is the way that we can be free from our ethnocentric ideas and seek creative and reflexive alternative solutions to prospect a better future.
      번역하기

      New World History began to emerge when historians failed to find solutions for the problems caused by the globalization, which widely spread across the world in the late 20st century and they tried to find alternative solutions for those problems. The...

      New World History began to emerge when historians failed to find solutions for the problems caused by the globalization, which widely spread across the world in the late 20st century and they tried to find alternative solutions for those problems. The global changes came to take place by the incidents of the German unification, the collapse of cold war followed by the fall of the Soviet Union, and in particular the September 11 attacks in the United States. These events made historians step further to seek a new world historical view.
      In this regard, the ideas regarding new world history started to be specified.
      We can see these changes from the following three cases. it con tains“ New world history”, “Global history”and “Big history”. First, the World History Association and the Journal of World History are the cases. Both of them were originally to establish the good status of the world history which was being globalized, Second, New Global History Initiative is another example. An intellectual group, which was established in 1989 and co-lead by Bruce Mazlish,a professor of MIT, and Wolf Schafer of Stony Brook University in New York,took a lead of this new field by publishing Conceptualizing Global History. Their work is specified through the course of‘ New Global History(2001)’taught by Bruce Mazlish and Akira Yiriye in Harvard University. Third example can be found in an effort to seek the concept of ‘a history of the whole universe,’which is more likely a general history. Maps of Time (2004) written by David Christian is an example of the effort.
      In the field of new world history which seeks the relationships and connectivity among groups based on the commonality of human beings, the concepts such as divergence, convergence, contagion, and systems are important and joint research are being promoted from multi-polar, pluralistic,and wide perspectives. The goal of the study is not to go back to the exclusive western supremacy of the modern history but to re-discover the enlightenment project, in other words, rationality of human actions. It is to make Humanocentric history not Eurocentric or Egocentric history. By this effort, it aims to transcend the traditional level of historical view, the developmental /improving historical view which is lineal, dualistic, and purposeful.
      This is to make new conceptualization of the Korean history possible in the context of new world history. Any researcher who is interested in making history globalized should first know that our historical experiences are closer to globality rather than modernity. In addition, he/she also needs to more focus on how to interpret the historical information rather than to collect the fundamental historical facts. With the information already given, it would be important for a researcher to infer, compare, seek relationships, find patterns, and interpret essential meanings of events of new world history. That is the way that we can be free from our ethnocentric ideas and seek creative and reflexive alternative solutions to prospect a better future.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      오늘날 회자되는 세계사들은 기존의 전통적인 세계사와는 용어, 개념 및 접근방법 뿐 만아니라 교재 및 교수 학습 내용의 구성에 있어서도 전혀 새로운 패턴들을 보여주고 있다.
      본고는 그 이해를 위한 시도적인 정리이다, 우선 최근 연구 동향을 통해 역사 연구와 역사교육에 있어서 세계사의 위상을 확인해 본다. 다음으로 역사학의 하위 영역(a subfield)으로서 전통적인 세계사와 새로운 세계사란 무엇인가를 알아 본다. 특히 universal history,new world history, global history, big history를 중심하여 그 개념화에 초점을 맞추었다. 어의, 과제와 방법, 그리고 기존의 세계사에서 새로운 세계사로의 전환과 그것이 가지는의미에 대해 살펴본다. 그것은 현재까지 학교교육을 통해서 세계사를 접해보지 못한 학생들뿐 만 아니라, 대학과 대학원 역사전공에서 세계사를 접해보지못한 교사들의 세계사 이해에일조할 수 있을 것이다.
      번역하기

      오늘날 회자되는 세계사들은 기존의 전통적인 세계사와는 용어, 개념 및 접근방법 뿐 만아니라 교재 및 교수 학습 내용의 구성에 있어서도 전혀 새로운 패턴들을 보여주고 있다. 본고는 그 ...

      오늘날 회자되는 세계사들은 기존의 전통적인 세계사와는 용어, 개념 및 접근방법 뿐 만아니라 교재 및 교수 학습 내용의 구성에 있어서도 전혀 새로운 패턴들을 보여주고 있다.
      본고는 그 이해를 위한 시도적인 정리이다, 우선 최근 연구 동향을 통해 역사 연구와 역사교육에 있어서 세계사의 위상을 확인해 본다. 다음으로 역사학의 하위 영역(a subfield)으로서 전통적인 세계사와 새로운 세계사란 무엇인가를 알아 본다. 특히 universal history,new world history, global history, big history를 중심하여 그 개념화에 초점을 맞추었다. 어의, 과제와 방법, 그리고 기존의 세계사에서 새로운 세계사로의 전환과 그것이 가지는의미에 대해 살펴본다. 그것은 현재까지 학교교육을 통해서 세계사를 접해보지 못한 학생들뿐 만 아니라, 대학과 대학원 역사전공에서 세계사를 접해보지못한 교사들의 세계사 이해에일조할 수 있을 것이다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김원수, "초등학교에서의 세계사 교육을 위한 일고찰" 서울교육대학교 27 : 57-61, 1994

      2 김원수, "초등학교 역사교육의 발전방향- 지구규모의 역사인식과 관련하여-" 서울교육대학교 초등교육연구소 7 : 79-81, 1995

      3 배한극, "지구화 시대의 새로운 세계사" 도서출판 혜안 23-, 2008

      4 배한극, "지구화 시대의 새로운 세계사" 도서출판 혜안 23-, 2008

      5 유윤종, "유세비우스의 『연대기』와 『교회사』" 한국서양사학회 (112) : 320-347, 2012

      6 토인비, "역사의 연구" 1934-1961,

      7 맥닐, "서구의 발흥" 1963

      8 슈펭글러, "서구의 몰락" 1918

      9 차하순, "새로운 세계사의 조건"

      10 배한극, "빅 히스토리(Big History)의 이론과 문제점" 역사교육학회 46 (46): 409-444, 2011

      1 김원수, "초등학교에서의 세계사 교육을 위한 일고찰" 서울교육대학교 27 : 57-61, 1994

      2 김원수, "초등학교 역사교육의 발전방향- 지구규모의 역사인식과 관련하여-" 서울교육대학교 초등교육연구소 7 : 79-81, 1995

      3 배한극, "지구화 시대의 새로운 세계사" 도서출판 혜안 23-, 2008

      4 배한극, "지구화 시대의 새로운 세계사" 도서출판 혜안 23-, 2008

      5 유윤종, "유세비우스의 『연대기』와 『교회사』" 한국서양사학회 (112) : 320-347, 2012

      6 토인비, "역사의 연구" 1934-1961,

      7 맥닐, "서구의 발흥" 1963

      8 슈펭글러, "서구의 몰락" 1918

      9 차하순, "새로운 세계사의 조건"

      10 배한극, "빅 히스토리(Big History)의 이론과 문제점" 역사교육학회 46 (46): 409-444, 2011

      11 김원수, "글로벌히스토리의현재적의미" 서양문화사학회 15 : 2006

      12 김원수, "글로벌히스토리와 역 사들의지평을넘어서" 한국서양사학회 92 : 277-286, 2007

      13 Casalilla Bartolome Yun, "‘Localism’, global History and Transnational History . A Reflection from the Historian of Early Modern Europe" 127 : 1-6, 2007

      14 "World history Connected" 3 (3): 2006

      15 Pomper Philip, "World History-Ideologies, Structures, and Identities-" Malden, Mass. and Oxford 21-, 1998

      16 Hughes-Warrington, "World History, and World Histories" 3 (3): 2006

      17 Geyer, "World History in a global Age"

      18 Geyer. Michael, "World History and General Education : How to Bring the World history into the Classroom, In The Nation, Europe, and the World : textbooks and curricula in transiition" Berghann Books 196-200, 2005

      19 Stearns. Peter, "World History : the basics" Routledge 2006

      20 Schissler Hanna, "World History : Making Sense of the Present, In The Nation, Europe, and the World : textbooks and curricula in transiition" Berghann Books 231-242, 2005

      21 Christian, David, "The return of Universal History, History and Theory" 49 : 6-27, 2010

      22 Christian, David, "The return of Universal History"

      23 Pomeranz,Kenneth, "The World that Trade Created: Society, Culture and the World Ecoonmy, 1400 to the Present" 1999

      24 Hodgson, "The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization" University of Chicago Press 1974

      25 Nietzche, "The Use and Abuse of History" Bobbs-Merrill 55-, 1957

      26 Bentley. J.H, "The New World History, In A Companion to Western Historical Thought" Blackwell 393-414, 2006

      27 Schafer, Wolf, "The New Global History toward a Narrative for Pangaea Two" 14 : 75-85, 2003

      28 Giovanni Arrighi, "The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Time" 1994

      29 Castells, Manuel, "The Intenet Galaxy: Reflections on the Intenet, Bussinesss, and Society" Oxford 2001

      30 Pomeranz,Kenneth, "The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the Modern World Economy" Princeton 2000

      31 Bruce Mazlish, "The Global History Reader" 2005

      32 Bruce Mazlish, "The Global History Reader" 2005

      33 Albrow,Martin, "The Global Age: State and Society Beyond Modernity" Stanford 93-97, 1997

      34 Miller,Jacquelyn C, "Teaching the History of Motherhood as ‘Big’History" 4 (4): 2007

      35 Leyden, W.Won, "Review of Jacgueline de Romilly, Time in Greek Tragedy" 209-229, 1970

      36 Prasenjit Duara, "Rescuing History from theNation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China" 1995

      37 Liebel, Helen, "Ranke’s Fragments of Universal History" 2 : 145-153,

      38 Dirik, Arif, "Performing the World: Reality and Representation in the Making of World histor(ies)" 16 (16): 2005

      39 Dirik, Arif, "Performing the World: Reality and Representation in the Making of World histor(ies)" 16 (16): 2005

      40 Hughes-Warrington,Marni, "Palgrave advances in World Historise" 2005

      41 Mink, Louis, "Narrative Form as a Cognitive Instument, In The Writing of History : Literary Form and Historical Understanding" Bulletin 129-149, 1954

      42 Stavrianos Leften, "Lifelines From Our Past- A New World History" M.E.Sharpe 1969

      43 Chandler, "Leviathan"

      44 Editorial, "Journal of Global History" 1 : 2006

      45 Meyerowitz.Joanne, "History and September 11th" Philadelphia 2003

      46 Momingliano, Arnold, "Greek Historiograph" 17 : 1-28, 1978

      47 Bentley, Jerry H, "Globalizing history and historicizing globalization" 30 :

      48 Hopkins, A. G, "Globalization in World History"

      49 Stavrianos, Leften, "Global history: From Prehistory to the Present" Prenticehall 1963

      50 Stavrianos, Leften, "Global history: From Prehistory to the Present" Prenticehall 1963

      51 Sachsenmaier Dominic, "Global history and critiques of western perspective" 42 (42): 455-463, 2006

      52 Patrick Karl O’Brien, "Global History for Global Citizenship"

      53 Carlyle, Thomas, "From On Heroes, Hero Worship, and the heroic in History, In The Varieties of History : From Voltaire to the Present" 101-107, 1972

      54 Wolf, E. R, "Europe and the People without History" Berkeley 1997

      55 볼테르, "Essai sur les moeurs et L’esprit des nations" 1754

      56 Martha Nussbaum, "Cultivating Humanity: A classical defence of reform in liberal education" Cambridge 1997

      57 Walsh, W. H, "Colligatory Concepts in History" Studies in the Nature and Teaching of History

      58 Spier, Fred, "Big History: The Emergence of an Interdisciplinary Science?" 6 (6): 2009

      59 Alvrez,Walter, "A Geological Perspective on Big History" 6 (6): 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.21 1.21 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.2 1.11 1.919 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼