RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      로잔대회 이전의 세속화 = Secularization Previous Lausanne Congress

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100272258

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The spirit of Lausanne Congress proves the uniqueness and finality of Jesus Christ. We refuse all deeds and theologies that obstruct, reject, and are corrupted this evidence. As mission was rapidly expended in mission field in 1910, missionaries and associations and churches from western tried to assemble with the unity of church and concord to fulfill ‘evangelization of the world in this generation’ in 1910 Edinburgh World Missionary Conference. The trial to enhance effectiveness of adaptation of mission field rather than positive proof and the evidence of the gospel had been expanded gradually. Evangelical mission movement to witness the salvation and the revelation of the Bible begined with this current. Evangelical mission and ecumenical mission were divided at this time. As IMC which focused on world mission being integrated with WCC, the mission-unity-meeting of evangelical mission agency was disassembled. Evangelical mission camp which had been in conflict with Ecumenical mission over the identity issue of mission was assembled by the Wheaton Congress and was organized by the Berlin Congress. The key subject of this conflict was ‘secularization’. Evangelical mission camp that had rejected liberal theology, communication with other religions in mission field, and syncretic bible understanding prepared for the Lausanne Congress of evangelical mission, having this subject as an essential task. The secularization of mission was the touchstone to distinguish these both sides, the evangelical and ecumenical camps, from 1910 to 1966. Linguistic playfulness and tendency of the ecumenical mission gave rise to crisis and problem of the evangelical mission. The Lausanne Congress which appeared at this time could find the root through the Wheaton and Berlin Congress. The debate on “Is the root of the Lausanne Congress the Wheaton Congress or the Berlin Conference?” concluded with being the Berlin Conference so the author questioned the validity. The author organized the structure and content over the successive Wheaton, Berlin and Lausanne Congress. The Wheaton Congress was helpful for the content and structure of the Lausanne Congress and the Berlin Congress was beneficial to personnel organization via an arrangement committee. This chart, shown below, summarizes them. 1963. Mexico CWME = A, 1966. 4. the Wheaton Congress = B 1966. 10. The Berlin Congress = C , 1974. the Lausanne Congress = D 1. the content process of secularization A - B = D 2. the process of development over the frame of secularization A - B = C = D 3. the member of the Lausanne Congress B - C = D To summarize, the previous secularization of the Lausanne Congress had already become background to prove the identity of Lausanne through the Edinburgh Conference in 1910, IMC, and CWME. If missional effort for efficient vitalization of mission and reinforcement of adaptation confuses, transmutes the gospel into other things, drives it into the crisis, or causes misconception, the Lausanne also regards those ones as secularization. This result was shown equally at LausanneⅠ, LausanneⅡ, and Lausanne Ⅲ with change on significant issue. Therefore, the previous secularization of the Lausanne Congress preserves ‘uniqueness and finality of Jesus Christ’ the key point of the Lausanne, being preached this content to the end of the world. Service and consideration will be conducted, but it is important that the identify of the gospel should not be lost. For this work the Lausanne is that everybody can hear the gospel with all the best about urgency and priority of progaganda. The Lausanne Congress is not corrupt. It aims to understanding the field of the ministry of the gosgel. There might be a mistake, however, that we might lose the gosgel, since just concentrating understanding it. The Lausanne Congress reveals that we should dedicate to world mission, having this fear and tension. The Lausanne Congress is The Lausanne.
      번역하기

      The spirit of Lausanne Congress proves the uniqueness and finality of Jesus Christ. We refuse all deeds and theologies that obstruct, reject, and are corrupted this evidence. As mission was rapidly expended in mission field in 1910, missionaries and a...

      The spirit of Lausanne Congress proves the uniqueness and finality of Jesus Christ. We refuse all deeds and theologies that obstruct, reject, and are corrupted this evidence. As mission was rapidly expended in mission field in 1910, missionaries and associations and churches from western tried to assemble with the unity of church and concord to fulfill ‘evangelization of the world in this generation’ in 1910 Edinburgh World Missionary Conference. The trial to enhance effectiveness of adaptation of mission field rather than positive proof and the evidence of the gospel had been expanded gradually. Evangelical mission movement to witness the salvation and the revelation of the Bible begined with this current. Evangelical mission and ecumenical mission were divided at this time. As IMC which focused on world mission being integrated with WCC, the mission-unity-meeting of evangelical mission agency was disassembled. Evangelical mission camp which had been in conflict with Ecumenical mission over the identity issue of mission was assembled by the Wheaton Congress and was organized by the Berlin Congress. The key subject of this conflict was ‘secularization’. Evangelical mission camp that had rejected liberal theology, communication with other religions in mission field, and syncretic bible understanding prepared for the Lausanne Congress of evangelical mission, having this subject as an essential task. The secularization of mission was the touchstone to distinguish these both sides, the evangelical and ecumenical camps, from 1910 to 1966. Linguistic playfulness and tendency of the ecumenical mission gave rise to crisis and problem of the evangelical mission. The Lausanne Congress which appeared at this time could find the root through the Wheaton and Berlin Congress. The debate on “Is the root of the Lausanne Congress the Wheaton Congress or the Berlin Conference?” concluded with being the Berlin Conference so the author questioned the validity. The author organized the structure and content over the successive Wheaton, Berlin and Lausanne Congress. The Wheaton Congress was helpful for the content and structure of the Lausanne Congress and the Berlin Congress was beneficial to personnel organization via an arrangement committee. This chart, shown below, summarizes them. 1963. Mexico CWME = A, 1966. 4. the Wheaton Congress = B 1966. 10. The Berlin Congress = C , 1974. the Lausanne Congress = D 1. the content process of secularization A - B = D 2. the process of development over the frame of secularization A - B = C = D 3. the member of the Lausanne Congress B - C = D To summarize, the previous secularization of the Lausanne Congress had already become background to prove the identity of Lausanne through the Edinburgh Conference in 1910, IMC, and CWME. If missional effort for efficient vitalization of mission and reinforcement of adaptation confuses, transmutes the gospel into other things, drives it into the crisis, or causes misconception, the Lausanne also regards those ones as secularization. This result was shown equally at LausanneⅠ, LausanneⅡ, and Lausanne Ⅲ with change on significant issue. Therefore, the previous secularization of the Lausanne Congress preserves ‘uniqueness and finality of Jesus Christ’ the key point of the Lausanne, being preached this content to the end of the world. Service and consideration will be conducted, but it is important that the identify of the gospel should not be lost. For this work the Lausanne is that everybody can hear the gospel with all the best about urgency and priority of progaganda. The Lausanne Congress is not corrupt. It aims to understanding the field of the ministry of the gosgel. There might be a mistake, however, that we might lose the gosgel, since just concentrating understanding it. The Lausanne Congress reveals that we should dedicate to world mission, having this fear and tension. The Lausanne Congress is The Lausanne.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김은수, "현대선교의 흐름과 주제" 대한기독교서회 2010

      2 Braten, E. Beat, "현대선교신학" 대한기독교출판사 1984

      3 김승호, "한국교회 성장 정체와 쇠퇴 원인분석과 대책에 관한 연구" 온양제일교회 2011

      4 정병준, "제10차 WCC 부산 총회 반대와 주요 쟁점과 대안" 대한기독교서회 36-46, 2013

      5 한국기독교학회선교신학회, "에큐메니컬 운동과 신학사전" 1 : 2002

      6 Stanley, Brain, "에딘버러세계선교사대회 어떻게 볼 것인가?" 한국연합선교회 1910

      7 Robson, George, "에딘버러대회의 역사와 기록 9권" 한국연합선교회, 주안대학원대학교출판부 2010

      8 조동진, "세계선교의 트랜드(상・하권)" 아시아선교연구소 2007

      9 Bosch, J. David, "세계를 향한 증거" 두란노 1980

      10 L. H. Andrew, "선교협력과 교회일치의 증진, 8권" 주안대학원대학교출판부 2012

      1 김은수, "현대선교의 흐름과 주제" 대한기독교서회 2010

      2 Braten, E. Beat, "현대선교신학" 대한기독교출판사 1984

      3 김승호, "한국교회 성장 정체와 쇠퇴 원인분석과 대책에 관한 연구" 온양제일교회 2011

      4 정병준, "제10차 WCC 부산 총회 반대와 주요 쟁점과 대안" 대한기독교서회 36-46, 2013

      5 한국기독교학회선교신학회, "에큐메니컬 운동과 신학사전" 1 : 2002

      6 Stanley, Brain, "에딘버러세계선교사대회 어떻게 볼 것인가?" 한국연합선교회 1910

      7 Robson, George, "에딘버러대회의 역사와 기록 9권" 한국연합선교회, 주안대학원대학교출판부 2010

      8 조동진, "세계선교의 트랜드(상・하권)" 아시아선교연구소 2007

      9 Bosch, J. David, "세계를 향한 증거" 두란노 1980

      10 L. H. Andrew, "선교협력과 교회일치의 증진, 8권" 주안대학원대학교출판부 2012

      11 Gibson, Kamball, "선교현장의 교회 2권" 주안대학원대학교출판부 2012

      12 Mueller, Karl, "선교학 사전" 2003

      13 Mackenzie, W. Douglas, "선교사훈련 5권" 연합선교회 2010

      14 Barton, James, "선교사역의 국내본부 6권" 한국연합선교회, 주안대학원대학교출판부 2010

      15 Carirns, D. S., "비기독교 종교들에 관한 선교적 메시지 4권" 한국연합선교회, 주안대학원대학교출판부 2010

      16 Mott, R. John, "비기독교 국가들에 대한 선교, 에딘버러 세계선교사대회 연구총서 1권" 한국연합선교회 2012

      17 조종남, "로잔운동의 역사와 신학" 선교횃불 2013

      18 Lindsell, "기독교의 세계선교" 생명의말씀사 1977

      19 Pierson, E. Paul, "기독교선교운동사" 기독교문서선교회 2009

      20 Kraemer, Handrik, "기독교선교와 타 종교" 기독교문서선교회 1993

      21 Keller, Albert, "기독교대백과사전, 9" 기독교대백과사전 편찬위원회, 기독교문사 1983

      22 Gore, C., "국민생활의 기독교화에 연관된 교육 3권" 주안대학원대학교출판부 2012

      23 Carl F. Henry, "World Congress on Evangelism" World Wide Publication 39-, 1967

      24 황홍렬, "WCC 개종전도 금지논란과 그 대안으로서의 ‘공동의 증언’" 대한기독교서회 47-55, 2013

      25 Wolfgang Guenther, "Von Edinburgh nacj Mexico City" Ev. Missionsverlag GmbH 1970

      26 Gerhard Mueller, "Theologische Realenzyklopaede (T.R.E)., Bd. 23, Mission, 3.4. Internationalisierung der Mission und Oekumenische Bewegung" Walter de Gruyter 52-54, 1994

      27 Raimundo Panikkar, "The Unknown Christ of Hinduism" Darton, Longman & Todd 1964

      28 WCC, "The Section Reports of the Wcc-from the first to the Seventh-Geneva" 한국장로교출판사 1993

      29 H. Oldham, "The International Review of Mission after twenty-five years" 24 (24): 1935

      30 E. J. Schoonhoven, "Tamberam 1938" (267) : 309-, 1978

      31 John Waddey, "Secularization of th2 Church" Then and Now on line

      32 Hans Dieter Betz, "Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, (R.G.G.), Internationaler Missionsrat(IMC), Bd.4" 202-203, 2002

      33 Niels-Peter Mortzen, "Neill: Geschichte der Christlichen Missionen. 2. Auf." Verlag der Ev.-Luth 1974

      34 William H. Swatos Jr., "Introduction –Secularization Theory: The Course of a Concept" 60 (60): 209-228, 1999

      35 T.E.F, "Five Years, A Report from the TEF 1958-63" 1963

      36 A. Scott Moreau, "Evangelical Dictionary of World Missions" Baker Books 2000

      37 H. Kraemer, "Die christliche Botschaft in einer nichtchristlichen Welt" Evangelischer Verlag 1940

      38 S. Reicke, "Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegewart, 3. Auf, 5Bd." J.C.B. Mohr 1986

      39 Waldron Scott, "Die Missionstheologie Karl Barth" Brennen Verlag 1977

      40 K. Barth, "Die Kirchliche Dogmatik 1/2" 1959

      41 Park, Young Whan, "Diakonie and Mission" 1996

      42 P. Potter, "Das Heil der Welt heute, Ende oder Beginn der Weltmission?" 1973

      43 Alexander Cunningham, "Biographical Dictionary of Christian Missions" Simon & Schuster Macmillan 1998

      44 George G. Hunter Ⅲ, "Biographical Dictionary of Christian Missions" Simon & Schuster Macmillan 1998

      45 Charles C. West, "Biographical Dictionary of Christian Missions" Simon & Schuster Macmillan 1998

      46 Hans-Werner Gensichen, "Biographical Dictionary of Christian Missions" Simon & Schuster Macmillan 1998

      47 Robert T. Coote, "Biographical Dictionary of Christian Missions" Simon & Schuster Macmillan 1998

      48 Samuel Escobar, "Biographical Dictionary of Christian Missions" Simon & Schuster Macmillan 1998

      49 Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization, "2004 Forum for World Evangelization" 2004

      50 한국연합선교회, "1910년 에딘버러 세계선교사대회 100주년 기념 2010 한국대회논문집, 1권-10권" 장로회신학대학교 세계선교연구원 2010

      51 Stanley, Brain, "1910 에딘버러 세계선교사대회 어떻게 볼 것인가 1권" 1910

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.8 0.8 0.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.77 0.71 0.448 0.68
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼