RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      장르, 헤게모니 그리고 관객

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76149608

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Studying films generically requires us to prioritize the similarities between texts rather than their individual differences. The conventions shared between different films in a genre are often disparaged by being referred to as 'a formula', and popul...

      Studying films generically requires us to prioritize the similarities between texts rather than their individual differences. The conventions shared between different films in a genre are often disparaged by being referred to as 'a formula', and popular films are then labeled 'formula art' by critics. I suggest that this distinction is not just between the spectrums of conventions, but between highbrow and lowbrow art with all the value judgments that those metaphors imply. I, therefore, attribute some of the distaste for action heroines in two of recent Korean films. 'Sassy Girl' and 'My Wife is a Gangster' to a class-based, high-cultural attitude toward the popular cinema.
      The problem with this purely textual definition of genre, however, is that it tends to miss other important elements in film. Thus, I propose to extend the concept of genre to include not only other texts in the genre, but also between text and audiences, text and producers, and producers and audiences. What emerges in this new conception of genre is the link between economy and culture. That is, genre serves the dual needs of a commodity: On the one hand standardization and familiarity, and on the other, product differentiation. But genre is more than economic. It is cultural as well.
      In this study, I invoke 'hegemony' in order to investigate this dual concern of economy and culture. Far from endless mere repetition, the film industry is always on the look-out for a new angle, making genre categories quite flexible. This is because the conventions of genre are under constant pressure for change as social practices and newly emerging audiences put pressure on representation. The final conclusion I make in this paper is, then, the changing social context determines that genre cannot exist by mere repetition, but has to engage with difference and change, in a process of negotiation and contest over representation, meaning and pleasure.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 장르와 상호텍스트성
      • 장르와 대중문화
      • 장르 변화와 대중 영화
      • 영화와 헤게모니 투쟁
      • 다의적 텍스트로서의 대중 영화
      • 장르와 상호텍스트성
      • 장르와 대중문화
      • 장르 변화와 대중 영화
      • 영화와 헤게모니 투쟁
      • 다의적 텍스트로서의 대중 영화
      • 미학적 의미와 사회적 의미의 차이
      • 팬덤과 열린 텍스트
      • 장르 영화의 정치학
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼